SCIENTIFIC WORK ABOUT CURRICULUM GUIDELINES FOR PHYSICAL EDUCATION: HISTORICAL DETERMINATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND INTERVENTION

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.97618

Keywords:

Scientific and technical activities. Curriculum. Legislation.

Abstract

This study, whose typology is Bibliographic Research, addresses scientific work related to Curricular Guidelines for Physical Education (known as DCNEF), aiming to apprehend the historical circumstances that structure the debate existing in the training field and, consequently, professional intervention in the area. The survey was conducted on the P@rthenon database and found 23 articles published at various times and journals, which were selected and classified according to three conditions: a) creation of DCNEF; b) CNE/CES Resolution 07/2004; c) 2015 Minute. The synthesis effort finds (1) a tendency to readjust differences in stances between the last two conditions and (2) a gap in scientific work as a result of the low number of studies that after 2015 Minute find deviation regarding the direction given to training and intervention in the area since the last two decades.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2020-05-13

How to Cite

MAIA, Júlio César Apolinário; SACARDO, Michele Silva. SCIENTIFIC WORK ABOUT CURRICULUM GUIDELINES FOR PHYSICAL EDUCATION: HISTORICAL DETERMINATIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND INTERVENTION. Movimento, [S. l.], v. 26, p. e26037, 2020. DOI: 10.22456/1982-8918.97618. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/Movimento/article/view/97618. Acesso em: 11 aug. 2025.

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.