A dilemma concerning the internationalization of Kendo as Budo
Japanese Zan-Shin and Korean Jon-Shim
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.143566Keywords:
Sport, Martial Arts, Kendo, BudoAbstract
While kendo practitioners outside of Japan, especially in South Korea, have advocated the inclusion of kendo as an Olympic sport, Japanese kendo organizations have resisted. We argue that if kendo were to take the form of an international Olympic-type sport, its value as a cultural art form would be reduced. Kendo, in its rules and formal structures, embodies traditional Japanese culture and ideas. We can see this when we consider the meaning of the Japanese term “zan-shin”, which plays a significant role in the judging of kendo, and its Korean translation as “jon-shim”. While “jon-shim” captures some of the practical and most observable aspects of “zan-shin”, it does not have the same cultural history and meaning. This results different attitudes toward the activity and different behavior in competition. We conclude that, while international competition is good for kendo, the Japanese concept of “zan-shin” must be maintained both in competition and in training.Downloads
References
ALL JAPAN KENDO FEDERATION. Kendo teaching guidelines. 2008. Kigamae, p. 158; Migamae, p. 166.
BENESCH, Oleg. Olympic samurai: Japanese martial arts between sports and self-cultivation. Sport in History, v. 40, n. 3, p. 328-355, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460263.2020.1739739
BENNETT, Alexander. The Black Ships of Kendo – South Korea: The International Popularization of Kendo and the Olympic In: YAMADA, Shoji; BENNETT Alexander. Martial Arts in Japanese Education: Training for Herat-Mind, Skill, and Body in the 21st Century. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho, 2007. p. 336-359.
HOSHIKAWA, Tamotsu. Why is importance placed on form in the martial arts? – centered in Kendo. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, v. 35, n. 11, p. 831-835, 1985.
HOSHIKAWA, Tamotsu; ODA, Yoshiko; EDO, Koichi. What is Japanese culture and traditional behavior as a learning content in martial arts? - Kendo’s Yuko-datotsu and zanshin. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, v. 64, n. 2, p.124-129, 2014.
II NAOSUKE; edited and revised text by II, Masahiro; KURASAWA, Yukihiro. Ichigo-ichie: A once in a lifetime encounter. Kyoto: Ittoen-Tokeisya, 1988. p. 115-116.
II NAOSUKE, recension and annotation by Toda. Chanoyu-ichie-shu: Kan-ya-sawa (Quiet Night Tea Celemony). Iwanami-bunko, p.132-133, 2012.
ILUNDÁIN-AGURRUZA, Jesús. Reflections on a Katana: the Japanese pursuit of performative mastery. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8, n. 4, p. 455-50, 2014a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1026632
ILUNDÁIN-AGURRUZA, Jesús. Riding the Wind: consummate performance, phenomenology, and skillful fluency. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8, n. 4, p. 374-419, 2014b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1026630
INTERNATIONAL KENDO FEDERATION. The Regulations of Kendo Shiai and Shinpan. The Subsidiary Rules of Kendo Shiai and Shinpan and the Guidelines for Kendo Shiai and Shinpan, 2017. Yuko-datotsu, p. 5; Torikeshi of yuko-datotasu. p. 14.
KREIN, Kevin. Philosophy and nature sports. New York: Routledge, 2019.
KREIN, Kevin. Sport, nature and worldmaking. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 2, n. 3, p. 285-301, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511320802475713
LEE, Jong-rim. Orthodox kendo textbook – Jong-hyeong. Lineage of School Heads, Samhomedia, 2010. p. 157.
MARTINKOVA, Irena; PARRY, Jim. Martial categories: clarification and classification. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 43, n. 1, p. 143-162, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2015.1038829
MARTINKOVA, Irena. Inclusion as the value of eligibility rules in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 50, n. 3, p. 345-364, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2023.2268700
MIYAMOTO, Musashi. recension and annotation by WATANABE, Ichiro. Five Rings: Gorin-no-sho. Tokyo: Iwanami-Bunko, 1985/1999. p. 152.
MURATA, Naoki. Internationalization of Judo. Nihon-Budokan, 2011.
NAGAKI, Kosuke. Succession and transformation of Kano’s judo philosophy. Kazama-Shobo, 2008.
NAKAMURA Tamio. Why Martial Arts Now?: comments on culture and tradition, Nippon Budokan, 2007. p. 270-271.
NISHIHIRA, Tadashi. Keiko no shiso (Thoughts of practice). Shunjyu-sha, 2019. p.18-28.
NISHIMURA, Hideki. Aesthetic of restraint in sports. Sekaishisosha, 2009. p. 86-89.
ODA, Yoshiko; KONDO, Yoshitaka. The concept of Yuko-datotsu in Kendo: interpreted from the Aesthetics of Zanshin. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8 n. 1, p. 3-15, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2013.873072
ODA, Yoshiko; KONDO, Yoshitaka. Challenges for the international development of Japanese Kendo: focusing on the conflict with Korean Kumdo, Journal of Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education, v. 43, n. 2, p. 125-140, 2012.
ODA, Yoshiko. Nikkan KENDO – KENDO to KUMDO no soukoku; Japanese KENDO and Korean KUMDO: conflict and future. Tokyo: Seikyusya, 2017.
PARK, Dong-chull. Aesthetics of Kendo Motion. The researcher report. The Annual Report of Budo and Sports Research Institute of International Budo University, v. 6, p. 207-211, 2001.
REID, Heather L. Sport, Philosophy, and the Quest for Knowledge. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 36, n. 1, p. 40-49, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2009.9714744
SHIOIRI, Hiroyuki. Considering the internationalization of kendo. edited by All Japan Educational University Kendo Federation. Seminar Kendo, 1992. p. 249-257.
SHOGAKUKAN; KUMSUNG Publishing Eds. Korean-Japanese Dictionary, 1993/2012. p.1574.
SHOGAKUKAN. Unabridged dictionary of the Japanese language, 1972/2001. p. 334.
TOMOZOE Hidenori. Martial Arts as a thought experiment: comparative culture of Martial Arts and Sports. Comments on Modern Sport, n. 21, p.15-16, 2009.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Movimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Movimento adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) for approved and published works. This means that authors:
- keep their copyrights and grant right of first publication to the journal; and
- as long as the authors’ names and Movimento’s initial publication rights are acknowledged, the authors may share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially).
More information at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
