Un dilema sobre la internacionalización del Kendo como Budo
Zan-Shin japonés y Jon-Shim coreano
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.143566Palabras clave:
Deporte, Artes marciales, Kendo, BudoResumen
Mientras los practicantes de kendo fuera de Japón, especialmente en Corea del Sur, han defendido su inclusión como deporte olímpico, las organizaciones japonesas de kendo se han resistido. Argumentamos que, si el kendo adoptara la forma de un deporte internacional de tipo olímpico, su valor como forma de arte cultural se vería reducido. El kendo, en sus reglas y estructuras formales, encarna la cultura y las ideas tradicionales japonesas. Podemos ver esto al considerar el significado del término japonés “zan-shin”, que desempeña un papel significativo en el arbitraje del kendo, y su traducción coreana como “jon-shim”. Aunque “jon-shim” captura algunos de los aspectos prácticos y más observables de “zan-shin”, no tiene la misma historia y significado cultural. Esto resulta en actitudes diferentes hacia la actividad y comportamientos distintos en la competencia. Concluimos que, aunque la competencia internacional es beneficiosa para el kendo, el concepto japonés de “zan-shin” debe mantenerse tanto en la competencia como en el entrenamiento.
Descargas
Citas
ALL JAPAN KENDO FEDERATION. Kendo teaching guidelines. 2008. Kigamae, p. 158; Migamae, p. 166.
BENESCH, Oleg. Olympic samurai: Japanese martial arts between sports and self-cultivation. Sport in History, v. 40, n. 3, p. 328-355, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460263.2020.1739739
BENNETT, Alexander. The Black Ships of Kendo – South Korea: The International Popularization of Kendo and the Olympic In: YAMADA, Shoji; BENNETT Alexander. Martial Arts in Japanese Education: Training for Herat-Mind, Skill, and Body in the 21st Century. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho, 2007. p. 336-359.
HOSHIKAWA, Tamotsu. Why is importance placed on form in the martial arts? – centered in Kendo. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, v. 35, n. 11, p. 831-835, 1985.
HOSHIKAWA, Tamotsu; ODA, Yoshiko; EDO, Koichi. What is Japanese culture and traditional behavior as a learning content in martial arts? - Kendo’s Yuko-datotsu and zanshin. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, v. 64, n. 2, p.124-129, 2014.
II NAOSUKE; edited and revised text by II, Masahiro; KURASAWA, Yukihiro. Ichigo-ichie: A once in a lifetime encounter. Kyoto: Ittoen-Tokeisya, 1988. p. 115-116.
II NAOSUKE, recension and annotation by Toda. Chanoyu-ichie-shu: Kan-ya-sawa (Quiet Night Tea Celemony). Iwanami-bunko, p.132-133, 2012.
ILUNDÁIN-AGURRUZA, Jesús. Reflections on a Katana: the Japanese pursuit of performative mastery. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8, n. 4, p. 455-50, 2014a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1026632
ILUNDÁIN-AGURRUZA, Jesús. Riding the Wind: consummate performance, phenomenology, and skillful fluency. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8, n. 4, p. 374-419, 2014b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1026630
INTERNATIONAL KENDO FEDERATION. The Regulations of Kendo Shiai and Shinpan. The Subsidiary Rules of Kendo Shiai and Shinpan and the Guidelines for Kendo Shiai and Shinpan, 2017. Yuko-datotsu, p. 5; Torikeshi of yuko-datotasu. p. 14.
KREIN, Kevin. Philosophy and nature sports. New York: Routledge, 2019.
KREIN, Kevin. Sport, nature and worldmaking. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 2, n. 3, p. 285-301, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511320802475713
LEE, Jong-rim. Orthodox kendo textbook – Jong-hyeong. Lineage of School Heads, Samhomedia, 2010. p. 157.
MARTINKOVA, Irena; PARRY, Jim. Martial categories: clarification and classification. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 43, n. 1, p. 143-162, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2015.1038829
MARTINKOVA, Irena. Inclusion as the value of eligibility rules in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 50, n. 3, p. 345-364, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2023.2268700
MIYAMOTO, Musashi. recension and annotation by WATANABE, Ichiro. Five Rings: Gorin-no-sho. Tokyo: Iwanami-Bunko, 1985/1999. p. 152.
MURATA, Naoki. Internationalization of Judo. Nihon-Budokan, 2011.
NAGAKI, Kosuke. Succession and transformation of Kano’s judo philosophy. Kazama-Shobo, 2008.
NAKAMURA Tamio. Why Martial Arts Now?: comments on culture and tradition, Nippon Budokan, 2007. p. 270-271.
NISHIHIRA, Tadashi. Keiko no shiso (Thoughts of practice). Shunjyu-sha, 2019. p.18-28.
NISHIMURA, Hideki. Aesthetic of restraint in sports. Sekaishisosha, 2009. p. 86-89.
ODA, Yoshiko; KONDO, Yoshitaka. The concept of Yuko-datotsu in Kendo: interpreted from the Aesthetics of Zanshin. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8 n. 1, p. 3-15, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2013.873072
ODA, Yoshiko; KONDO, Yoshitaka. Challenges for the international development of Japanese Kendo: focusing on the conflict with Korean Kumdo, Journal of Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education, v. 43, n. 2, p. 125-140, 2012.
ODA, Yoshiko. Nikkan KENDO – KENDO to KUMDO no soukoku; Japanese KENDO and Korean KUMDO: conflict and future. Tokyo: Seikyusya, 2017.
PARK, Dong-chull. Aesthetics of Kendo Motion. The researcher report. The Annual Report of Budo and Sports Research Institute of International Budo University, v. 6, p. 207-211, 2001.
REID, Heather L. Sport, Philosophy, and the Quest for Knowledge. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 36, n. 1, p. 40-49, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2009.9714744
SHIOIRI, Hiroyuki. Considering the internationalization of kendo. edited by All Japan Educational University Kendo Federation. Seminar Kendo, 1992. p. 249-257.
SHOGAKUKAN; KUMSUNG Publishing Eds. Korean-Japanese Dictionary, 1993/2012. p.1574.
SHOGAKUKAN. Unabridged dictionary of the Japanese language, 1972/2001. p. 334.
TOMOZOE Hidenori. Martial Arts as a thought experiment: comparative culture of Martial Arts and Sports. Comments on Modern Sport, n. 21, p.15-16, 2009.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Movimento

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
La revista Movimento adopta la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0) para los trabajos aprobados y publicados. Eso significa que los/as autores/as:
- mantienen los derechos autorales y conceden a la revista el derecho de primera publicación; y
- tienen derecho a compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y construir a partir del material para cualquier propósito, incluso comercialmente).
