Bodily practices as a concept?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.118810Keywords:
Concept formation. Knowledge. Physical Education.Abstract
From a post-structuralist perspective, it proposes to problematize the term Bodily Practices as a concept for the field of Physical Education. Studies, research and arguments in the literature demonstrate the heterogeneity, indefiniteness and polysemy of this term. It presents scientific and linguistic subsidies to support that Bodily Practices does not have sufficient specificity, stability and density to be considered as such, from structuralist perspectives. However, if considering understandings inspired by the philosophy of difference and post-structuralism, Bodily Practices has the potential to be considered a concept for the field.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Movimento (Porto Alegre)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Movimento adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) for approved and published works. This means that authors:
- keep their copyrights and grant right of first publication to the journal; and
- as long as the authors’ names and Movimento’s initial publication rights are acknowledged, the authors may share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially).
More information at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
