Subvertendo as regras no esporte

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.143364

Palavras-chave:

Esporte, Ética, Espírito Esportivo, Regras Esportivas

Resumo

O que significa subverter as regras no esporte? Uma forma de fazer isso é interferir ou restringir a exibição das habilidades do adversário, o que pode ocorrer de duas maneiras: a) violando deliberada e abertamente as regras, ou b) agindo de forma contrária ao espírito esportivo. Em ambos os casos, ocorre uma transgressão da norma que valoriza a demonstração/exercício de habilidades como elemento essencial para uma boa competição. No primeiro caso, você integra as penalidades às regras do jogo, como se infringir as regras fosse parte da própria dinâmica do jogo. No segundo caso, adota-se uma (nova) estratégia que limita a exibição das habilidades do adversário sobre a qual as regras nada estabelecem. A motivação por trás desses atos não é o aprimoramento do jogo, mas garantir a vitória. Neste artigo, ilustro e analiso essa subversão das regras, trazendo reflexões sobre o papel das regras no jogo e uma boa competição.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Miroslav Imbrišević , The Open University (OU). Milton Keynes, Reino Unido

The Open University, UK

Referências

ARNOLD, Peter J. Sport as a valued human practice: a basis for the consideration of some moral issues in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Education, v. 26, n. 2, p. 237-255, 1992. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.1992.tb00284.x

CARLSON, Chad; GLEAVES, John. Categorical shortcomings: application, adjudication, and contextual descriptions of game rules. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 38, n. 2, p. 197-211, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2011.10510422

CHERRY, Christopher. Regulative rules and constitutive rules. The Philosophical Quarterly, v. 23, n. 93, p. 301-315, 1973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2218059

D’AGOSTINO, Fred. The ethos of games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 8, n. 1, p. 7-18, 1981. DOI: ttps://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1981.9714372

FRALEIGH, Warren P. Why the good foul is not good. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, v. 53, n. 1, p. 41-42, 1982. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.1982.10629279

FRALEIGH, Warren P. Intentional rules violations – one more time. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 30, n. 2, p. 166-176, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2003.9714642

GREBERT-CRAIG, Brooke. Underarm bowling incident: what Trevor Chappell did in 1981. The New Daily, 2018. Available at: https://www.thenewdaily.com.au/sport/cricket/2018/03/28/underarm-bowling-incident. Accessed on: Jan, 10, 2024

HART, Herbert L. A. The concept of law. 2. ed. Oxford: OUP, 1997.

IMBRIŠEVIĆ, Miroslav. The strategic foul and contract law: efficient breach in sports? Fair Play: Revista de Filosofía, Ética y Derecho del Deporte, v. 12, p. 68-99, 2018. Available at: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/ejemplar/502838. Accessed on: Jan, 10, 2024.

IMBRIŠEVIĆ, Miroslav. The art of pushing: Olympic taekwondo. Idrottsforum, 2019. Available at: https://idrottsforum.org/feature-imbrisevic190523/. Accessed on: Jan, 10, 2024.

IMBRIŠEVIĆ, Miroslav. Why break the rules – in life and in sport? Idrottsforum, 2020a. Available at: https://idrottsforum.org/imbrisevic200617/. Accessed on: Jan, 10, 2024.

IMBRIŠEVIĆ, Miroslav. The language of strategic fouling. Idrottsforum, 2020b. Available at: https://idrottsforum.org/imbrisevic200928/. Accessed on: Jan, 10, 2024.

IMBRIŠEVIĆ, Miroslav. The jurisprudence of strategic fouling. In: IMBRIŠEVIĆ, Miroslav (ed.). Sport, law, and philosophy: the jurisprudence of sport. London: Routledge, 2023. p. 219-230.

JÜNGER, Friedrich. G. Die Spiele: ein Schlüssel zu ihrer Bedeutung. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann, 1953.

KANT, Immanuel. Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1998 [1787].

KOLNAI, Aurel. Games and aims. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, v. 66, p. 103-128, 1965. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4544725. Accessed on: Jan, 10, 2024.

McFEE, Graham. Sport, rules and values. London: Routledge, 2004.

MCINTOSH, Peter C. Fair play: ethics in sport and education. London: Heinemann, 1979.

MEIER, Klaus V. Restless sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 12, n. 1, p. 64-77, 1985. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1985.9714430

MORGAN, William J. The logical incompatibility thesis and rules: a reconsideration of formalism as an account of games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 14, n. 1, p. 1-20, 1987. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1987.9714447

RAZ, Joseph. Practical reasons and norms. Oxford: OUP, 1999 [1975].

RUSSELL, John S. Are rules all an umpire has to work with? Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 26, n. 1, p. 27-49, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1999.9714577

SEARLE, John. Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.

ŠKERBIĆ, Matija M.; MARKOVIĆ, Milos; MANDIĆ, Radijov; PARRY, Jim. Empirical ethics of sport: intentional rule-breaking and professional players in the ABA basketball league. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 2024 (no prelo).

SUITS, Bernard. The Grasshopper: games, life and utopia. Peterborough: Canada, Broadview Press, 2005.

TORRES, Cesar R. What counts as part of a game? Reconsidering skills. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 45, n. 1, p. 1-21, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2017.1415150

VAMPLEW, Wray. Playing with the rules: influences on the development of regulation in sport. The International Journal of the History of Sport, v. 24, n. 7, p. 843-871, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09523360701311745

Publicado

2024-11-13

Como Citar

IMBRIŠEVIĆ , M. Subvertendo as regras no esporte. Movimento, [S. l.], v. 30, p. e30056, 2024. DOI: 10.22456/1982-8918.143364. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/Movimento/article/view/143364. Acesso em: 19 jun. 2025.

Edição

Seção

Em foco #1