The case as a reference of the method: possibility dialectic integration of syllogism to think the empirical research in communication
possibilidade de integração dialética do silogismo para pensar a pesquisa empírica em comunicação
Keywords:
Epistemology. Method. Communication.Abstract
In this article, we develop reflection about the case as ambit of inscriptions of the method in empirical research. It argue about value of syllogism like cognitive operation clarifying about relations between case and abduction following a peircean lineage accentuated in Eco and Sebeok (2004). It searches to incorporate, dialectically, the critiques about use of syllogism to think the method (Santaella 2000) and at the same time, it is qualifying it with others contributions (Eco e Bonfantini, 2004). It infers about the possibility that such references are mediations for analysis of researches in progress in the field of communication, specifying clear relations between deduction, induction and abduction.Downloads
References
BARRENA, Sara. Peirce. La Logica Considerada Como Semiotica. Biblioteca Nueva. 2007.
BONFANTINI, Mássimo e PRONI, Giampaolo. Suposição: sim ou não? Eis a questão. In: O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2004.
BOURDIEU, Pierre et alli. Ofício de sociólogo: metodologia da pesquisa na sociologia. Petrópolis: Editora Vozes, 2004.
ECO, Humberto. Os três tipos de abduções. In: O signo de três. São Paulo: Perspectiva. 2004.
FERREIRA, Jairo. Hipótesis sobre la abducción en el enredo de las argumentaciones. La Trama de la Comunicación, v. 14, p. 1-15, 2010.
NINO, Douglas. Peirce, abdução y práctica médica. Disponível em http://www.unav.es/gep/bibliopeirceana.html. Acesso em: 01 out. 2012.
NUBIOLA, Jaime. La abducción o lógica de la sorpresa. Disponível em: http://www.cem.itesm.mx/dacs/publicaciones/logos/anteriores/n21/21_jnubiola.html. 2009. Acesso em 01 out. 2012.
PEIRCE, C. S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. HARTSHORNE, Charles (ed); WEISS, Paul (ed); 1930-1935. BURKS, Arthur (ed); 1958. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
PEIRCE, Charles (1878). Deducción, inducción e hipótesis. Traducción castellana y notas de Juan Martín Ruiz-Werner (1970). Disponívelem: http://www.unav.es/gep/DeducInducHipotesis.html. Acesso em 01 out. 2012.
PEIRCE, Charles (1901). Sobre la lógica de la extracción de la historia a partir de documentos antiguos, especialmente de testimonios. Traducción castellana de Douglas Niño (2001). Disponível em http://www.unav.es/gep/LogicofDrawingHistory.pdf. Acesso em: 01 out. 2012.
PEIRCE, C. S., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. HARTSHORNE, Charles (ed); WEISS, Paul (ed); 1930-1935.
SANTAELLA, Lucia. La evolución de los tres tipos de argumento:abducción, inducción y deducción. Disponível em http://www.unav.es/gep/AN/Santaella.html. Acesso em: 01 out. 2012.
SANTAELLA, Lucia. O método anticartesiano de C.S. Peirce. São Paulo: Unesp/Fapesp, 2004.
WALTER-BENSE, Elisabeth. A teoria geral dos signos. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 2000.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Jairo Ferreira
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of works published in this journal belong to the authors, and the right of first publication is conceded to the journal. Due to the journal being of open access, the articles are of free use in research, educational and non-commercial activities.
Therefore, the journal uses the License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship.
Self-archiving (repository policy): authors are allowed to deposit all versions of their work in institutional or thematic repositories without embargo. It is requested, whenever possible, that the full bibliographic reference of the version published in Intexto (including the DOI link) be added to the archived text.
Intexto does not charge any article processing fees (article processing charge).
