Às amadoras e amantes das ciências
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/2238-152X.118098Keywords:
Objetividade, Feminismo, Amadoras.Abstract
Based on reflections on objectivity in feminist studies, we argue, in this essay, for the importance of reactivating attention practices and affective policies that open up to wonder, awe and other types of affectations triggered in the production of scientific knowledge. We refer to amateurs and lovers to allude to a certain way in which scientists put themselves in relationship with the world and the sciences. The interest of science lovers is different from that which produce modern objectivity, they turn to localized knowledge and wonder, open themselves to multiplicity and to the construction of other affections, bodies, agencies and subjectivities in encounters with humans and non-humans and in the constitution of situated knowledge.
Downloads
References
Barad, K. (2011). Erasers and erasures: Pinch’s unfortunate ‘uncertainty principle’. Social Studies of Science, 41(3), 443–454. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711406317
Barad, K. (2017). Troubling time/s and ecologies of nothingness: re-turning, re-membering, and facing the incalculable. New Formations, 92(31), 56-86. Recuperado de https://muse.jhu.edu/article/689858
Barad, K. (2020). Performatividade queer da natureza. Revista brasileira de estudos da homocultura, 03(11), 300-346. doi: 10.31560/2595-3206.2020.11.11882
Daston, L. (1999). As imagens da objetividade: a fotografia e o mapa. In F. Gil (Ed.), A ciência tal qual se faz. (pp. 79-103). Lisboa: Sá da Costa.
Daston, L. (2017). Historicidade e objetividade. São Paulo: LiberArs.
Daston, L. & Galison, P. (2010). Objectivity. Princeton University: Zone Books.
Despret, V. & Stengers, I. (2012). Les faiseuses d’histoires: Que font les femmes à la pensée? Paris: La Découverte: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond parution.
Dias, J. P., Borba, M., Vanzolini, M., Sztutman, R., Schavelzon, S. & Averty, M. (2016). Uma ciência triste é aquela em que não se dança: Conversações com Isabelle Stengers. Rev. Antropol., 59(2), 155-186. doi: https://doi.org/10.11606/2179-0892.ra.2016.121937
Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: the reinvention of Nature. New York: Routledge.
Haraway, D. (2004). The Haraway Reader. New York: Routledge.
Harding, S. (1995). “Strong objectivity”: A response to the new objectivity question. Synthese, 104, 331–349. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064504
Harding, S. (2007). Gênero, democracia e filosofia da ciência. RECIIS – R. Eletr. de Com. Inf. Inov. Saúde, 1(1), 163-168. doi: doi.org/10.29397/reciis.v1i1.891
Harding, S. (2019). Objetividade mais forte para ciências exercidas a partir de baixo. Em construção: arquivos de epistemologias históricas e estudos de ciência. 5, 143-162. doi: https://doi.org/10.12957/emconstrucao.2019.41257
Kuala, R. (2008). Naturalizing Objectivity. Perspectives on Science, 16(3), 285-302. Recuperado de https://direct.mit.edu/posc/article/16/3/285/15230/Naturalizing-Objectivity
Latour, B. (1993). Pasteur on lactic acid yeast- a partial semiotic analysis. Configurations, 1(1), 127-142. Recuperado de http://www.bruno-latour.fr/node/257.html
Latour, B. (1996). On Interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–245. Recuperado de http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/63-INTEROBJECTS-GB.pdf
Latour, B. (2009). Como falar do corpo? A dimensão normativa dos estudos sobre a ciência. In J. A. Nunes & R. Roque (Orgs.), Objectos Impuros. Experiências em Estudos sobre a Ciência (pp. 38-61). Porto: Afrontamento.
Law, J. (2000). Objects, Spaces and Others. Centre for Science Studies Lancaster University, 4, 1-13. Recuperado de https://www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/resources/sociology-online-papers/papers/law-objects-spaces-others.pdf
Law, J. (2004). After Method: mess in social Science research. Lancaster University: Psychology Press.
Shotter, J. (2013). Agentive spaces, the “background”, and other not well articulated influences in shaping our lives. Journal for the theory of social behaviour, 43(2), 133-154. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jtsb.12006
Sloterdijk, P. (2003). Esferas I. Burbujas. Madrid: Ediciones Siruela.
Shotter, J. (2013). From inter- subjectivity, via inter- objectivity, to intra- objectivity: from a determinate world of separate things to an indeterminate world of inseparable flowing processes. In: Gordan, S., Daanen P. & Maghadam, F. (Orgs.), Uderstanding the self and the others. (pp. 1-20). Londres, Routledge.
Stengers, I. (2011). “For a public intelligence of science”, Alliage, 69. Recuperado de http://revel.unice.fr/league/index.html?id=3239
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright Statement
Authorship Responsibility:
First author: ______________________________________________________________________
Manuscript title:___________________________________________________________________
Manuscript Number:________________________________________________________________
Co-author(s) identification (in the order that they should appear in the manuscript):____________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
1. Author Statement of Responsibility: - By this statement I guarantee, that in case of multiple authors, they read and agreed with the terms of this statement, granting me, through their written authorization, the right to sign this statement on their behalf; - Certify that it is an original and unpublished work, that neither, partially or totally, any other work with substantially similar content, of my authorship, was published or is being considered for publication elsewhere, electronically or printed; - Certify that, if requested, I will provide or cooperate in obtaining the information data on which the article was based, for examination by the editors; - Certify that all authors have participated sufficiently in this work, holding also the public responsibility for their content. In case of articles with more than six authors, the statement must specify the type(s) of participation(s) of each author, as specified below: - It is certify that In this work, (1) I, significantly contributed to the design, planning, collection and/or analysis and interpretation of data; (2) significantly contributed to the manuscript draft and/or in the critical revision of the content, (3) Participated effectively in the approval of the final version of the manuscript.
________________________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________________________
Signature (on behalf of all authors):
________________________________________________________________________________
Date:____________________________________________________________________________
Copyright Transfer:
It is stated that, in case of recommendation for publication (acceptance) of the manuscript, I agree that its copyrights shall become the exclusive property of the journal Polis e Psique, implying the prohibition of any form of reproduction, totally or partially, in any other part or means of divulgation, printed or electronic, without the request of a prior authorization that, if obtained, I will provide the proper acknowledgment to the Polis e Psique Journal from Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul.
Signature (on behalf of all authors):
________________________________________________________________________________
Date:
