Between power, affects and knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1807-8583.154431Keywords:
graduate studies, evaluation, power relations, knowledge, tensionsAbstract
This essay explores the power relations permeating the institutional, academic, and personal structures of a graduate program and research center, consolidated through processes of learning, evaluation, and affective relationships. These reflections respond to the lived experiences related to the thirty-year history of the Graduate Program in Communication at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. It specifically considers the complexity of the continuous processes of choice and evaluation involving faculty and future master’s and doctoral students regarding research themes, supervision, readings, and scientific production. These processes also form the foundational structure of the program, which is incessantly evaluated by funding agencies and public policies. For this essay, the concepts housed within the term “evaluation” centralize the approach to the power relations between forms of knowledge, emotions and tensions.
Downloads
References
BACHELARD, Gaston. A formação do espírito científico: contribuição para uma
Psicanálise do conhecimento. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 1996.
BOURDIEU, Pierre. Sociologia. São Paulo: Ática, 1983.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogia dos sonhos possíveis. São Paulo: Paz e Terra, 2015.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Organización y decisión. México: Herdes, 2010.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maria Helena Weber

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of works published in this journal belong to the authors, and the right of first publication is conceded to the journal. Due to the journal being of open access, the articles are of free use in research, educational and non-commercial activities.
Therefore, the journal uses the License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship.
Self-archiving (repository policy): authors are allowed to deposit all versions of their work in institutional or thematic repositories without embargo. It is requested, whenever possible, that the full bibliographic reference of the version published in Intexto (including the DOI link) be added to the archived text.
Intexto does not charge any article processing fees (article processing charge).






