Democracia e a ecologia complexa das redes sociais online: um estudo sobre discussões acerca do racismo e da homofobia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19132/1807-8583201534.492-512Palabras clave:
Deliberação. Racismo. Homofobia. Blog. Facebook. YouTube.Resumen
Este artigo tem por objetivo examinar a ecologia complexa da comunicação em diferentes ambientes online. Enquanto a maioria dos estudos sobre a comunicação digital investiga plataformas ou fóruns particulares, este estudo examina a repercussão de um evento controverso – expressões racistas e homofóbicas do Deputado Jair Bolsonaro no Programa CQC – em três ambientes: YouTube, blogs e Facebook. A análise explora como os cidadãos, mediante a conversação online diária, trocam suas opiniões e perspectivas, negociam o valor e o tratamento que dispensam uns aos outros. Os resultados revelam as características do conflito social concernente às regras de convivência cívica nessas diferentes plataformas, com recursos e dispositivos próprios, com expectativas de interação distintas entre os usuários e com públicos específicos.
Descargas
Citas
ANDREW, Mendelson; PAPACHARISSI, Zizi. Look at us: collective narcissism in college student Facebook photo galleries. In: PAPACHARISSI, Zizi (Ed.). A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge, 2011. p. 251-273.
APOCALYPSEFORFREE. Bolsonaro detona gays, negros e Preta Gil em favor da familia [sic]. [São Paulo, 2011]. Disponível em: <http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8imZAGzO_c>. Acesso em: 9 set. 2015.
ARONOVICH, Lola. Bolsonaro e seu nicho de mercado reaça. In: ARONOVICH, Lola. Escreva Lola Escreva. [S.l.], 2011. Disponível em: <http://escrevalolaescreva.blogspot.com.br/2011/03/bolsonaro-e-seu-nicho-de-mercado-reaca.html>. Acesso em: 9 set. 2015.
BÄCHTIGER, André et al. Disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. Journal of Political Philosophy, Oxford, v. 18, p. 32-63, 2010.
BOU-FRANCH, Patricia; LORENZO-DUS, Nuria; BLITVICH, Pilar Garcés-Conejos. Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: a study of coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Bloomington, v. 17, p. 501-521, 2012.
BOYD, Danah; ELLISON, Nicole. Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Bloomington, v. 13, p. 210-230, 2007.
BURGESS, Jean; GREEN, Joshua. YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press, 2009.
CITRON, Danielle Keats. Civil rights in our information age. In: LEVMORE, Saul; NUSSBAUM, Martha. The offensive internet: speech, privacy, reputation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2010, p. 31-49.
CONROY, Meredith; FEEZELL, Jessica; GUERRERO, Mario. Facebook and political engagement: a study of online political group membership and offline political engagement. Computers in Human Behavior, Amsterdam, v. 28, p. 1535-1546, 2012.
DOUAI, Aziz; NOFAL, Hala. Commenting in the online arab public sphere: debating the Swiss Minaret Ban and the “ground zero mosque” online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Bloomington, v. 17, p. 266-282, 2012.
ELLISON, Nicole et al. With a little help from my friends: how social network sites affect social capital processes. In: PAPACHARISSI, Zizi (Ed.). A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York, NY: Routledge, 2011. p. 124-145.
ELLISON, Nicole; STEINFIELD, Charles; LAMPE, Cliff. Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled: communication practices. New Media Society, Chicago, v. 13, n. 6, p. 873-892, 2011.
FACEBOOK. Página Jair Bolsonaro. 2011a.
FACEBOOK. Evento Fora Bolsonaro. 2011b.
FRASER, Nancy. Social justice in the age of identity politics: redistribution, recognition, and participation. In: FRASER, Nancy; HONNETH, Axel (Ed.). Redistribution or recognition: a political-philosophical exchange. Nova York, NY: Verso, 2003. p. 7-109.
FORST, Rainer. “To tolerate means to insult”. Toleration, recognition and emancipation. In: VAN DEN BRINK, Bert; OWEN, David. Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of social critical theory. New York: Cambridge University, 2007. p. 215-237.
GALEOTTI, Anna Elisabetta. Toleration as recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2002.
GIL, Preta. Preta Gil. 2011. Disponível em: <https://twitter.com/pretagil>. Acesso em: 29 mar. 2011.
GRASMUCK, Sherri; MARTIN, Jason; ZHAO, Shanyang. Ethno-racial identity displays on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, Bloomington, v. 15, n. 1, p. 158-188, 2009.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Between facts and norms. Cambridge: MIT, 1996.
HARGITTAI, Eszter; HSIEH, Yu-li Patrick. From dabblers to omnivores: a typology of social network site usage. In: PAPACHARISSI, Zizi (Ed.). A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge, 2011. p. 146-168.
HARTLEY, John. Uses of YouTube: digital literacy and the growth of knowledge. In: BURGESS, Jean; GREEN, Joshua (Ed.). YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity, 2009. p. 126-143.
HILL, Kevin A.; HUGHES, John E. Cyberpolitics: citizen activism in the age of the internet. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 1998.
JENKINS, Henry. What happened before YouTube. In: BURGESS, Jean; GREEN, Joshua (Ed.). YouTube: online video and participatory culture. Cambridge: Polity, 2009. 109-125.
JURIS, Jeffrey. Violence performed and Imagined: militant action, the black bloc, and the mass media in Genoa. Critique of Anthropology, Manchester & Londres, v. 25, n. 4, p. 413-432, 2005.
KAYE, Barbara. Between Barack and a net place: users and uses of social network sites and blogs for political information. In: PAPACHARISSI, Zizi (Ed.). A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge, 2011. p. 208-231.
KIES, Raphaël. Promises and limits of web-deliberation. Nova York: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2010.
KIM, Yonghwan. The contribution of social network sites to exposure to political difference: the relationships among SNSs, online political messaging, and exposure to cross-cutting perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior, Amsterdam, v. 27, p. 971-977, 2011.
MAIA, Rousiley Celi Moreira. From public sphere to deliberative system: locating the place of the media. In: MAIA, Rousiley Celi Moreira. Deliberation, the media and political talk. New York: Hampton, 2012. p. 59-76.
MAIA, Rousiley Celi Moreira. Recognition and the Media. Nova York: Palgrave McMillan, 2014.
MARQUES, Flaco. Bolsonaro, meu bom. In: PAPO de Homem. [S.l.], 2011. Disponível em: <http://papodehomem.com.br/bolsonaro-meu-bom/>. Acesso em: 9 set. 2015.
MANSBRIDGE, Jane et al. A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In: PARKINSON, John; MANSBRIDGE, Jane (Ed.). Deliberative systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2012. p. 1-26.
MOROZOV, Evgeny. The net delusion: the dark side of internet freedom. New York: PublicAffairs, 2011.
MUTZ, Diana. Hearing the other side: deliberative versus participatory democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University, 2006.
O’SULLIVAN, Patrick. Masspersonalcommunication: rethinking the mass interpersonal divide. In: THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATION, 2005, New York. Disponível em: <http://www.academia.edu/3768497/Web_as_a_medium_of_masspersonal_communication>. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2012.
PAPACHARISSI, Zizi. A private sphere: democracy in a digital age: digital media and society series. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2010.
PAPACHARISSI, Zizi; OLIVEIRA, Maria de Fatima. Affective news and networked publics: the rhythms of news storytelling on #Egypt. Journal of Communication, Seatle, v. 62, p. 266-282, 2012.
PETTIT, Philip. Deliberative democracy, the discursive dilemma, and republican theory. In: FISHKIN, James; LASLETT, Peter (Ed.). Debating deliberative democracy: philosophy, politics and society. Malden: Blackwell, 2003. p. 138-162.
RECUERO, Raquel. Fluxos de informação e capital social nos weblogs. In: STEFFEN, Cesar; POZENATO, Kenia M. (Org.). Mídia, cultura e contemporaneidade. Caxias do Sul: EDUCS, 2010. p. 117-142.
RECUERO, Raquel; AMARAL, Adriana; MONTARDO, Sandra. Blogs: mapeando um objeto. In: AMARAL, Adriana; RECUERO, Raquel; MONTARDO, Sandra (Org.). Blogs.com: estudos sobre blogs e comunicação. São Paulo: Momento, 2009. p. 27-54.
ROCHA, Marcela. Bolsonaro: Meu filho não namoraria Preta Gil por causa do comportamento dela. Terra Magazine por Bob Fernandes, São Paulo, 29 mar. 2011. Disponível em: <http://terramagazine.terra.com.br/interna/0,,OI5034595-EI6578,00-Bolsonaro+Meu+filho+nao+namoraria+Preta+Gil+por+causa+do+comportamento+dela.html>. Acesso em: 9 set. 2015.
ROWE, Ian. Civility 2.0: a comparative analysis of incivility in online political discussion. Information, Communication & Society, July 2014. Disponível em: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1369118X.2014.940365#.VcygBvlVhBc. Acesso em: 13 ago. 2015.
TREMAYNE, Mark. Harnessing the active audience: synthesizing blog research and lessons for the future of media. In: TREMAYNE, Mark (Ed.). Blogging, citizenship and the future of media. New York: Routledge, 2007. p. 261-272.
TUFEKCI, Zeynep; WILSON, Christopher. Social media and the decision to participate in political protest: observations from Tahrir Square. Journal of Communication, Seattle, v. 62, p. 363-379, 2012.
WALTHER, Joseph et al. Interaction of interpersonal, peer, and media influence sources online: a research agenda for technology convergence. In: PAPACHARISSI, Zizi (Ed.). A networked self: identity, community and culture on social network sites. New York: Routledge, 2011. p. 17-38.
WALTHER, Joseph et al. Self-generated versus other-generated statements and impressions in computer-mediated communication: a test of warranting theory using Facebook. Communication Research, Thousand Oaks, v. 36, p. 229-253, 2009.
YOUNG, Iris. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University, 2000.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2015 Rousiley Celi Moreira Maia, Thaiane Alexsandra Silva Rezende

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Los derechos de autor de los artículos publicados en esta Revista pertenecen a los autores, y los derechos de la primera publicación están garantizados para la revista. Por estar publicados en una revista de acceso libre, los artículos son de uso gratuito, con la atribución apropiada, en las actividades educativas y no comerciales.
La revista utiliza la Licencia Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0), que permite el intercambio de trabajo con el reconocimiento de la autoría.
Autoarchivo (política de repositorios): se permite a los autores depositar todas las versiones de sus trabajos en repositorios institucionales o temáticos, sin período de embargo. Se solicita, siempre que sea posible, que se agregue la referencia bibliográfica completa de la versión publicada en Intexto (incluido el enlace DOI) al texto archivado.
Intexto no cobra ninguna tarifa por el procesamiento de artículos (article processing charge).