Strategic perspectives for modular construction adoption
Keywords:
Modular Construction, Production Structure, Product Architecture, Product Platform, Business StrategyAbstract
Various industrial sectors have adopted industrialized production. However, its application in the construction industry is still limited. Lack of knowledge, the need for innovative technologies, and the lack of adequate business strategies have hindered the adoption of modular construction (MC). However, a well-defined strategy can structure the adoption of MC, enabling the sector to gradually benefit from industrialized processes, achieving gains in time, quality, cost control, and production standardization. The research aims to elaborate business strategies for adopting MC based on the association and integration between phases, architecture, strategy, and modular product platforms. A systematic literature review (SLR) on MC is carried out, followed by a qualitative meta-synthesis to integrate the primary research results. This research goes beyond the results of the individual primary studies analyzed in the SRL, arriving at new contributions to knowledge in the form of associations and integrations between the concepts that give rise the business strategies presented. This analysis indicates a product platform designed to support three business strategies for structured CM adoption in the construction sector. From a practical and applied point of view, the research contributes to a greater systemic understanding of CM and supports strategic decision-making in its adoption process.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ambiente Construído

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright
Authors of articles published in Ambiente Construído retain the copyright of their works, licensing them under the Creative Commons Attribution BY 4.0 license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, provided that the original work is properly cited.


