Análise de domínio
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/1808-5245.30.140568Palavras-chave:
organização do conhecimento, análise de domínio, ciência da informaçãoResumo
A abordagem analítica de domínio para a organização do conhecimento (e para o campo mais amplo da Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação) é delineada. O artigo revisa as discussões e propostas sobre a definição de domínios e fornece um exemplo de um estudo analítico de domínio no campo dos estudos de arte. Variedades de análise de domínio, bem como críticas e controvérsias, são apresentadas e discutidas.
Downloads
Referências
ABRAHAMSEN, Knut Tore. Indexing of musical genres: an epistemological perspective. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 30, n. 3-4, p. 144-169, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-3-4-144. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. This is not domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 42, n. 8, p. 557-561, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-557. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne; PEJTERSEN, Annelise Mark. Cognitive work analysis and work centered design of classification schemes. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 30, n. 3-4, p. 213-227, 2003. Disponível em: https:// doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-3-4-213. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
AMERICAN Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual: mental disorders (DSM-I). Washington: American Psyciatric Press, 1952.
AMERICAN Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual: mental disorders (DSM-II). 2. ed. Washington: American Psyciatric Press, 1968.
AMERICAN Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual: mental disorders (DSM-II 6th printing). 2. ed. Washington: American Psyciatric Press, 1974.
ANDERSEN, Heine. Influence and reputation in the social sciences–how much do researchers agree? Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 56, n. 6, p. 674-692, 2000. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/EUM0000000007132. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
ARANGO, Guillermo. Domain analysis methods. In: SCHÄFER, Wilhelm; PRIETO-DÍAZ, Rubén; MATSUMOTO, Masao, (ed.). Software reusability. Chichester: Ellis Horwood, 1994. p. 17-49.
ARANGO, Guillermo; PRIETO-DÍAZ, Rubén. Introduction and overview: domain analysis concepts and research directions. In: PRIETO-DÍAZ, Rubén;
ARANGO, Guillermo. Domain analysis and software systems modeling. Los Alamitos: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991. p. 9-32.
AUDUNSON, Ragnar; NORDLIE, Ragnar; CATHRINE SPANGEN, Inger. The complete librarian: an outdated species? LIS between profession and discipline. New Library World, Leeds, v. 104, n. 6, p. 195-202, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074800310481876. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
BAKHURST, David. Marxism. In: DANCY, Jonathan; SOSA, Ernest; STEUP, Matthias (ed.). Companion to epistemology. Oxford: Blackwell, 1994. p. 268-270.
BANERJEE, Shreya; SARKAR, Anirban. Ontology-driven approach towards domain-specific system design. International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies, Geneve, v. 11, n. 1, p. 39-60, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJMSO.2016.078110. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
BATES, Marcia J. Information: the last variable. In: ASIS’87: proceedings of the 50th ASIS Annual Meeting, Boston, Mass., October 4-8 1987. Medford: American Society for Information Science by Learned Information, 1987. p. 6-10.
BAWDEN, David. On not being a weak discipline. Blog - The occasional informationist: irregular thoughts on the information sciences, London, 31 May 2015. Disponível em: http://theoccasionalinformationist.com/blog/. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
BEAK, Jihee et al., International comparative domain analysis in knowledge organization research topics in four countries-Brazil, South Korea, Spain and the United States. NASKO, Washington, v. 4, p. 30-39, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7152/nasko.v4i1.14643. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
BERLIN, Brent. Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1992.
BONDEBJERG, Ib. Film: genres and genre theory. In: SMELSER, Neil J. et al., (ed.). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2001. p. 5640-5646.
BRUCE, Murray. Foreword: a brief history of classifying birds. In: DEL HOYO, Josep et al. Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona: Lynx, 1992. v. 8, p. 11-43.
BUDTZ PEDERSEN, David; EMMECHE, Claus; STJERNFELT, Frederik (ed.). Mapping frontier research in the humanities. London: Bloomsbury, 2016. p. 1-256.
CASTANHA, Renata; ROSAS, Fábio; GRÁCIO, Maria Cláudia. The complementarity of Hjørland’s and Tennis’s proposals to domain analysis under bibliometrics. In: GUIMARÃES, Jose Augusto Chaves; DODEBEI, Vera; MILANI, Suellen Oliveira (ed.) Knowledge organization for a sustainable world: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society. Baden-Baden: Ergon-Verlag, 2016. p. 219-226.
CHUA, Alton YK; YANG, Christopher C. The shift towards multi‐disciplinarity in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 59, n. 13, p. 2156-2170, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20929. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
COOKE, Nancy J. Varieties of knowledge elicitation techniques. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Amsterdam, v. 41, n. 6, p. 801-849, 1994. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.1994.1083. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
DALBERG, Ingetraut. Brief communication: why a new universal classification system is needed. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 44, n. 1, p. 65-71, 2017. Disponível em: http:// doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2014-1-85. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
DAM CHRISTENSEN, Hans. Kunsten at vælge fra: om bradfordsk materialevalg og vidensorganiseringens socialitet. Dansk Biblioteksforskning, Denmark, v. 3, n. 1, p. 31-43, 2007.
DEXTRE CLARKE, Stella G. Origins and trajectory of the long thesaurus debate. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 43, n. 3, p. 44-138, 2016. Disponível em: http:// doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-3-138. Acesso em: 1 ago 2024.
DRAGUSIN, Radu et al. FindZebra: a search engine for rare diseases. International Journal of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam, v. 82, n. 6, p. 528-538, 2013a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2013.01.005. Acesso em: 1 ago 2024.
DRAGUSIN, Radu et al., Specialized tools are needed when searching the web for rare disease diagnoses. Rare Diseases, London, v. 1, n. 1, p. 528-38, 2013b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.4161/rdis.25001. Acesso em: 1 ago 2024.
DRESCHER, Jack. Out of DSM: depathologizing homosexuality. Behavioral sciences, Basel, v. 5, n. 4, p. 565-575, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3390/bs5040565. Acesso em: 1 ago 2024.
DUBITZKY, Werner et al. (ed.). Encyclopedia of systems biology. New York: Springer, 2013.
EGAN, Margaret E.; SHERA, Jesse H. Foundations of a theory of bibliography. The Library Quarterly, Chicago, v. 22, n. 2, p. 125-137, 1952.
ERIKSSON, Rune. Classification and indexing of fiction: A theoretical and historical perspective. 2010. Dissertação (Pós-Doutorado) - Royal School of Library and Information Science, Copenhagen, 2010.
EVANS, Eric. Domain-driven design: tackling complexity in the heart of software. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003.
FERNIE, Eric C. Art history and its methods: a critical anthology. London: Phaidon Press, 1995.
FIDEL, Raya. Human information interaction: an ecological approach to information behavior. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2012.
FJELDSÅ, Jon. Avian classification in flux. In: DEL HOYO, Josep et al. Handbook of the birds of the world. Barcelona: Lynx, 2013. p. 77-146.
FOX, Melodie J. “Priorities of Arrangement” or a “Hierarchy of Oppressions?”: Perspectives on intersectionality in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 43, n. 5, p. 373-383, 2016. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
FORSKNINGSRÅDSNÄMNDEN. Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskap: förslag inför 90-talet. Stockholm: Forskningsrådsnämnden (FRN) [Swedish council for planning and co-ordination of research], 1889.
FOSKETT, Douglas John. Classification and indexing in the social sciences. London: Butterworths, 1974.
FRY, Jenny. Scholarly research and information practices: a domain analytic approach. Information Processing & Management, Amsterdam, v. 42, n. 1, p. 299-316, 2006. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2004.09.004. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
FRY, Jenny; TALJA, Sanna. The intellectual and social organization of academic fields and the shaping of digital resources. Journal of Information Science, Thousand Oaks, v. 33, n. 2, p. 115-133, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/0165551506068153. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
FULANI, Lenora. Race, identity and epistemology. In: HOLZMAN, Louis; MORSS, John (ed.). Postmodern psychologies, societal practice and political life. New York: Routledge, 2000. p. 151-164.
GARVEY, William D.; GRIFFITH, Belver C. Scientific information exchange in Psychology: the immediate dissemination of research findings is described for one science. Science, Washington, v. 146, n. 3652, p. 1655-1659, 1964. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.1126/science.146.3652.165. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
GNOLI, Claudio; SZOSTAK, Rick. Universality is inescapable. Advances in Classification Research, Seattle, p.1-9, nov. 2014.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto C.; MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, Daniel; ALVES, Bruno Henrique. Epistemic communities in knowledge organization: an analysis of research trends in the Knowledge Organization journal. In: ISKO UK Biennial ConferenceKnowledge, 4., 2015, London. Proceedings [...]. London: ISKO, 2015. p. 113-123.
GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves; TOGNOLI, Natália Bolfarini. Provenance as a domain analysis approach in archival knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 42, n. 8, p. 562-569, 2015. Disponível em: doi.org/ 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-562. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HIRSCHFELD, Lawrence A.; GELMAN, Susan A. (ed.). Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Nine principles of knowledge organization. Advances in Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 4, p. 91-100, 1994.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Officiel opposition ved Louise Limbergs disputation 20. Marts 1998 på Göteborgs Universitet. Swedish: SvenskBiblioteksforskning/Library Research, 1998a. n. 1, p. 27-63.
HJORLAND, Birger. The classification of psychology: a case study in the classification of a knowledge field. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 25, n. 4, p. 162-201, 1998b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-1998-4-162. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 58, n. 4, p. 422-462, 2002a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.1108/00220410210431136. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Epistemology and the socio‐cognitive perspective in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 53, n. 4, p. 257-270, 2002b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10042. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. The special competency of information specialists. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 53, n. 14, p. 1275- 1276, 2002c. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10158. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Domain analysis: A socio‐cognitive orientation for information science research. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 30, n. 3, p. 17-21, 2004. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.312. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Facet analysis: the logical approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing & Management, Amsterdam, v. 49, n. 2, p. 545-557, 2013a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2012.10.001. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. User-based and cognitive approaches to knowledge organization: a theoretical analysis of the research literature. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 40, n. 1, p. 11-27, 2013c. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.5771/0943-7444-2013-1-11. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Informetrics needs a foundation in the theory of science. In: SUGIMOTO, Cassidy (ed.). Theories of informetrics and scholarly communication. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2016a. p. 20-46.
HJØRLAND, Birger. The paradox of atheoretical classification. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 43, n. 5, p. 313-323, 2016b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2016-5-313. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Book review: Theory development in the information sciences. Diane H. Sonnenwald. Austin, TX : University of Texas Press, 2016. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 68, n. 7, p. 1796-1801, 2017a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23749. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Classification. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 44, n. 2, p. 97-128, 2017b. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.5771/0943-7444-2017-2-97. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger; ALBRECHTSEN, Hanne. Toward a new horizon in information science: domain‐analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, New Jersey, v. 46, n. 6, p. 400-425, 1995. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199507)46:6<400::AID-ASI2>3.0.CO;2-Y. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
HJØRLAND, Birger; HARTEL, Jenna. Afterword: ontological, epistemological and sociological dimensions of domains. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 30, n. 3-4, p. 239-245, 2003. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-3-4-239. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
JANSEN, Eva Hourihan. Domain analysis: assumptions and new techniques for articulating domains. In: PROPOSAL FOR CoLIS9, 2016, Uppsala Sweden. Proceedings [...]. Uppsala: Uppsala University, 2016.
KEILTY, Patrick; SMIRAGLIA, Richard P. Gay male nomenclature. In: GUIMARÃES, Jose Augusto Chaves; DODEBEI, Vera; MILANI, Suellen Oliveira (ed.) Knowledge Organization for a Sustainable World: challenges and perspectives for cultural, scientific, and technological sharing in a connected society. Baden-Baden: Ergon-Verlag, 2016. v. 15 p. 579-586.
KELLY, Steven; TOLVANEN, Juha-Pekka. Domain-specific modeling: enabling full code generation. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell, 2008.
KHALIDI, Muhammad Ali. Natural categories and human kinds: classification in the natural and social sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.
KIERKEGAARD, Søren. Kierkegaard’s journals and notebooks. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2015.
KUHN, Thomas S. The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.
LANGRIDGE, Derek W. Classification and indexing in the humanities. London: Butterworths, 1976.
LARSEN, Svend. Digital effektivitet i bibliotekerne. Danmarks Biblioteker, Danmark, n. 1, p. 16-17, 2009.
LEE, Frederic. A history of heterodox economics: challenging the mainstream in the twentieth century. London: Routledge, 2009.
LIMBERG, L. Synthesizing or diversifying library and information science. Sketching past achievements, current happenings and future prospects, with an interest in including or excluding approaches. Information Research, Boras, v. 22, n. 1, 2017.
LISBOA, Liana Barachisio et al.A systematic review of domain analysis tools. Information and Software Technology, Amsterdam, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1-13, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2009.05.001. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, María J. Domain analysis for interdisciplinary knowledge domains. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 42, n. 8, p. 570-580, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-570. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
LYKKE-NIELSEN, M. Domain analysis, an important part of thesaurus construction. Advances in Classification Research Online, Washington, v. 11, n. 1, p. 9-22, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7152/acro.v11i1.12768. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MAI, Jens-Erik. Analysis in indexing: document and domain centered approaches. Information Processing & Management, Amsterdam, v. 41, n. 3, p. 599-611, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2003.12.004. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MAI, Jens-Erik. Actors, domains, and constraints in the design and construction of controlled vocabularies. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 35, n. 1, p. 16-29, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2008-1-16. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MAI, Jens‐Erik. Classification in a social world: bias and trust. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 66, n. 5, p. 627-642, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.1108/00220411011066763. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MARTELETO, Regina Maria; CARVALHO, Lidiane dos Santos. Health as a knowledge domain and social field: dialogues with Birger Hjørland and Pierre Bourdieu. Knowledge Organization, v. 42, n. 8, p. 581-590, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-581. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MARTÍNEZ-ÁVILA, Daniel; GUIMARÃES, José Augusto Chaves; EVANGELISTA, Isadora Victorino. Epistemic communities in Knowledge Organization: an analysis of the NASKO meetings proceedings. NASKO, Washington, v. 6, p. 113-123, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.7152/nasko.v6i1.15235. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MATTSSON, Kurt. Cognitive work analysis i design af kontrollerede vokabularer. 2016. Thesis (Information Science and Cultural Mediation) - Royal School of Library and Information Science, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2016.
MILLETT, Scott; TUNE, Nick. Patterns, principles, and practices of domain-driven design. Indianapolis: John Wiley & Sons, 2015.
MILLS, Jack. Faceted classification and logical division in information retrieval. Library Trends, Illinois, v. 52, n. 3, p. 541-570, 2004. Disponível em: https://hdl.handle.net/2142/1687. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MOTE, Lionel JB. Reasons for the variations in the information needs of scientists. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 18, n. 4, p. 169-175, 1962. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb026319. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
MUSTAFA EL HADI, Widad. Cultural interoperability and knowledge organization systems. In: GUIMARÃES, Ocsé Augusto Chaves; DODEBEI, Vera (org.). Organização do conhecimento e diversidade cultural. Marília: ISOC-Brasil; FUNDEPE, 2015. p. 575-606.
NAIKAR, Neelam. Work domain analysis: concepts, guidelines, and cases. Boca Raton: CRC press, 2013.
NASCIMENTO, Denise M.; MARTELETO, Regina M. Social field, domains of knowledge and informational practice. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 64, n. 3, p. 397-412, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810867605. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
NEIGHBORS, James M. Software construction using components. 1980. Dissertação (Doutorado) - University of California, Irvine, 1980.
OROM, Anders. Knowledge organization in the domain of art studies-history, transition and conceptual changes. Knowledge organization, Baden-Baden, v. 30, n. 3/4, p. 128-143, 2003. Disponível em: https:// doi.org/10.5771/0943-7444-2003-3-4-128. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
PARROCHIA, Daniel et al.Towards a general theory of classifications. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2013.
PRIETO-DIAZ, Ruben. Domain analysis: an introduction. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes, New York, v. 15, n. 2, p. 47-54, 1990. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/382296.382703. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
PRIETO-DIAZ, Ruben. Implementing faceted classification for software reuse. Communications of the ACM, New York, v. 34, n. 5, p. 88-97, 1991. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1145/103167.103176. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
PRIETO-DIAZ, Rubén. Applying faceted classification to domain analysis. In: SHAW, Debora (ed.). ASIS '92: Proceedings of the 55th ASIS Annual Meeting (Pittsburgh, PA). Medford: Learned Information, 1992. p. 316-317.
MEDLINE. Frequently asked questions about indexing for MEDLINE. Bethesda: National Library of Medicine, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/indexfaq.html#qualifications. Acesso em: 4 jul. 2016.
RAGHAVAN, K. S.; APOORVA, K. H.; JIVRAJANI, Aarti. Information retrieval as a domain: visualizations based on two data sets. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 42, n. 8, p. 591-601, 2015. Disponível em: https:doi.org/ 10.5771/0943-7444-2015-8-591. Acesso em: 1 ago. 2024.
RASMUSSEN, Jens. et al.Cognitive Systems Engineering. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1994.
ROBERTSON, Stephen. The state of information retrieval. United Kingdom: ISKO-UK, 2008. [Presentation and audio recording freely].
SARACEVIC, Tefko. Relevance: A review of and a framework for the thinking on the notion in information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, New Jersey, v. 26, n. 6, p. 321-343, 1975. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630260604. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
SHAPERE, Dudley. Scientific theories and their domains. In: SUPPE, Frederick (ed.). The structure of scientific theories. 2. ed. Illinois: University of Illinois Press, 1977. p. 518-565.
SHAPERE, Dudley. Reason and the search for knowledge: investigations in the philosophy of science. Boston: Reidel, 1984.
SHERA, Jesse H. The training of the chemical librarian: a challenge and an opportunity. In: SHERA, Jesse H. (ed.). Libraries and the organization of knowledge. London: Crosby Lockwood and Son, 1965. p. 185-196.
SMIRAGLIA, Richard. Epistemology of domain analysis. In: SMIRAGLIA, Richard; LEE, Hur-Li Lee (ed.). Cultural frames of knowledge. Würzburg: Ergon Verlag, 2012. p. 111-124.
SMIRAGLIA, Richard P. Domain analysis for knowledge organization. Oxford: Chandos Publishing, 2015.
SMITH, Catherine Arnott. An evolution of experts: MEDLINE in the library school. Journal of the Medical Library Association, Bethesda, v. 93, n. 1, p. 53-60, 2005.
SONNENWALD, Diane H. Theory development in the information sciences. Austin: Austin University of Texas Press, 2016.
SZOSTAK, Rick. Universal and domain-specific classifications from an interdisciplinary perspective. In: CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION PARADIGMS AND CONCEPTUAL SYSTEMS IN KNOWLEDGE ORGANIZATION, 2010. Proceedings [...]. Wurzburg: Erlon Verlag, 2010. p. 71-77.
SZOSTAK, Rick. Speaking truth to power in classification: response to Fox’s review of my work. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 40, n. 1, p. 76-76, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/ 0.5771/0943-7444-2013-1-76. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
SZOSTAK, Rick.; GNOLI, Claudio.; LÓPEZ-HUERTAS, Maria J. Interdisciplinary knowledge organization. Cham: Springer, 2016.
TAIRAS, Robert; MERNIK, Marjan; GRAY, Jeff. Using ontologies in the domain analysis of domain-specific languages. In: CHAUDRON, Michel (ed.). Models in software engineering: workshops and symposia at MODELS 2008, Toulouse. Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. p. 332-342.
TALJA, Sanna. The domain analytic approach to the study of scholars’ information practices. In: FISHER, K.; ERDELEZM S.; MCKECHNIE, L. (ed.). Theories of information behavior. Medford: Information Today, 2005. p. 123-127.
TENGSTRÖM, Emin. Biblioteks- och informationsvetenskapen - ett fler- eller tvärvetenskapligt område? Svensk Biblioteksforskning, Schweden, v. 4, n. 1, p. 9-20, 1993.
TENNIS, Joseph.T. Two axes of domains for domain analysis. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 30, n. 3/4, p. 191-195, 2003. Disponível em: https:// http://hdl.handle.net/1773/37935. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
TENNIS, Joseph T. What does a domain analysis look like in form, function, and genre? Brazilian Journal of Information Science (BRAJIS), Marília, v. 6, n. 1, p. 3-15, 2012. https://doi.org/10.36311/1981-1640.2012.v6n1.02.p3. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
TOULMIN, Stephen. Human understanding: the collective use and evolution of human concepts. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1972.
VERNON, Vaughn. Implementing domain-driven design. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2013.
VERNON, Vaughn. Domain-driven design distilled. Boston: Addison-Wesley, 2016.
VICENTE, Kim J. Cognitive work analysis: towards safe, productive, and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1999.
VICKERY, Brian Campbell. Faceted classification: a guide to the construction and use of special schemes. London: ASLIB, 1960.
WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel et al., Open the social sciences: report of the Gulbenkian Commission on the restructuring of the social sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1996.
WALTER, Tobias; PARREIRAS, Fernando Silva; STAAB, Steffen. An ontology-based framework for domain-specific modeling. Software & Systems Modeling, New York, v. 13, n. 1, p. 83-108, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-012-0249-9. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
WATSON, John B. Psychological care of the infant and child. New York: W. W. Norton, 1928.
WEBB, William H; BEALS, Alan R.; WHITE, Carl Milton. Sources of information in the social sciences: a guide to the literature. 3. ed. Chicago: American Library Association, 1986.
WESOLEK, Andrew. Wittgensteinian support for domain analysis in classification. Library Philosophy and Practice, Nebraska, n. 795, 2012.
WHITLEY, Richard. The intelectual and social organization of the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
ZANDONADE, Tarcisio. Social epistemology from Jesse Shera to Steve Fuller. Library Trends, Illinois v. 52, n. 4, p. 810-832, 2004. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/2142/1705. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2024.
Referências adicionais
DAM CHRISTENSEN, Hans. The framing of scientific domains: About UNISIST, domain analysis and art history. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 70, n. 2, p. 261-281, 2014.
FOX, Melodie J. Book review [of Szostak (2003) and Szostak (2004)]. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 39, n. 4, p. 300-303, 2012.
GNOLI, Claudio. Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 137-149, 2008.
GNOLI, Claudio. Ten long-term research questions in knowledge organization. Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 35, n. 2-3, p. 137-149, 2008.
GNOLI, Claudio. What is knowledge organization about? Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 43, n. 8, p. 668-9, 2016.
GNOLI, Claudio. What is knowledge organization about? Knowledge Organization, Baden-Baden, v. 43, n. 8, p. 668-9, 2016.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Concept theory. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 60, n. 8, p. 1519-1536, 2009.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Core classification theory: a reply to Szostak. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 64, n. 3, p. 333-342, 2008.
HJØRLAND, Birger. Information science and its core concepts: Levels of disagreement. In: LBEKWE-SANJUAN, Fidelia; DOUSA, Tom. Theories of information, communication and knowledge: A multidisciplinary approach. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013b. p. 205-235.
HOLMBERG, John Howard. Nonmodern philosophy and the ideology of domain analysis. 2013. Thesis (Library and Information Science) - Royal School of Library and Information Science,University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, 2013.
KJELLMAN, Ulrika. Från kungaporträtt till läsketikett: En domänanalytisk studie över Kungl. bibliotekets bildsamling med särskild inriktning mot katalogiserings- och indexeringsfrågor. Uppsala: Uppsala Universitet, 2006.
LUYT, Brendan. Replacing the ideology of information by exploring domains of knowledge: A case study of the periodization of Philippine history and its application to information studies. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 71, n. 6, p. 1289-1299, 2015.
PIETRAS, Monika; ROBINSON, Lyn. Three views of the “musical work”: bibliographical control in the music domain. Library Review, [s.l.], v. 61, n. 8/9, p. 551-560, 2012.
ROOS, Annikki; HEDLUND, Turid. Using the domain analytical approach in the study of information practices in biomedicine. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 72, n. 5, p. 961-986, 2016.
SARACEVIC, Tefko. Information science: origin, evolution and relations. Conceptions of library and information science: historical, empirical and theoretical perspectives. London: Taylor Graham, 1992. p. 5-27.
SLIFE, Brent D.; WILLIAMS, Richard N. What’s behind the research? Discovering hidden assumptions in the behavioral sciences. London: Sage Publications, 1995.
SMIRAGLIA, Richard. Elements of knowledge organization. Cham: Springer International Pu, 2014.
SØNDERGAARD, Trine S.; ANDERSEN, Jack.; HJØRLAND, Birger. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 59, n. 3, p. 278-320, jun. 2003.
STAM, Robert. Film theory an introduction. Malden: Blackwell, 2000.
SZOSTAK, Rick. Classification, interdisciplinarity, and the study of science. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 64, n. 3, p. 319-332, 25 abr. 2008.
SZOSTAK, Rick. Complex concepts into basic concepts. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, New Jersey, v. 62, n. 11, p. 2247-2265, 31 ago. 2011.
TALJA, Sanna.; MAULA, Hanni. Reasons for the use and non‐use of electronic journals and databases. Journal of Documentation, Leeds, v. 59, n. 6, p. 673-691, dez. 2003.
TEICH, Elke et al., The linguistic construal of disciplinarity: A data-mining approach using register features. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Leesburg, v. 67, n. 7, p. 1668-1678, 5 maio 2015.
VAN VENROOIJ, Alex; VAUGHN, Schmutz. Classifications in popular music. In: WRIGHT, D. (org.). International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2. ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2015. v. 3, p. 799-804,
VICKERY, Brian Campbell. Classification and indexing in science. London: Butterworths, 1996.
WEBER, Nicholas M. et al., Value and context in data use: domain analysis revisited. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, [s.l.], v. 49, n. 1, p. 1-10, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/meet.14504901168. Acesso em: 8 ago. 2024.
Downloads
Publicado
Como Citar
Edição
Seção
Licença
Copyright (c) 2023 Birger Hjørland; Thiago Henrique Bragato Barros
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantêm os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria.
Autores têm autorização para assumir contratos adicionais separadamente, para distribuição não exclusiva da versão do trabalho publicada nesta revista, como publicar em repositório institucional, com reconhecimento de autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
Os artigos são de acesso aberto e uso gratuito. De acordo com a licença, deve-se dar o crédito apropriado, prover um link para a licença e indicar se mudanças foram feitas. Não é permitido aplicar termos jurídicos ou medidas de caráter tecnológico que restrinjam legalmente outros de fazerem algo que a licença permita.
