University-based coach education
the complexity of the appropriation and development of learner-centered teaching
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.127202Keywords:
Higher Education, Sport Sciences, Professional EducationAbstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the initial development of learner-centered teaching (LCT) in the “Sports Coach” course, from the Sports Science program at University of Campinas. Following a qualitative approach and action research procedures, we present the planning, implementation, and evaluation of the LCT in the course through the program and institutional plan, class plans and logbook; the teachers' perspective through critical-reflective conversations and logbook entries; the opinions of the student-coaches through questionnaires and focus group. We used the thematic analysis technique. The LCT was shown to be complex, especially due to the appropriation of principles and development as an approach. The student-coaches perceived an approximation of the course to the practical reality of the coach, contributing to motivation and significant learning. We emphasize the need to train teachers in LCT and the approximation of the role of coach developers in coach education at the university.
Downloads
References
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION. Learner-centered psychological principles: a framework for school reform and redesign. Washington: APA, 1997.
ANDREW, K.; RICHARDS, R.; RESSLER, James D. A collaborative approach to self-study research in physical education teacher education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, v. 35, n. 3, p. 290–295, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2015-0075
BARR, Robert; TAGG, John. From teaching to learning - a new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, v. 27, n. 6, p. 12–26, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00091383.1995.10544672
BLASCHKE, Lisa Marie. Heutagogy and lifelong learning: A review of heutagogical practice and self-determined learning. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, v. 13, n. 1, p. 56–71, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i1.1076
BLUMBERG, Phyllis. Developing learner-centered teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2009.
BRAUN, Virginia; CLARKE, Victoria; WEATE, Paul. Using thematic analysis in sport and exercise research. In: SMITH, Brett; SPARKES, Andrew (ed.). Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. London: Routledge, 2016. p. 191–205.
BURKE, Shaunna. Rethinking ‘validity’and ‘trustworthiness’ in qualitative inquiry: how might we judge the quality of qualitative research in sport and exercise sciences? In: SMITH, Brett; SPARKES, Andrew. (ed.). Routledge handbook of qualitative research in sport and exercise. London: Routledge, 2016. p. 352–362.
CALLARY, Bettina et al. Making sense of coach development worldwide during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Sport Communication, v. 13, n. 3, p. 575–585, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ijsc.2020-0221
CHESTERFIELD, Gavin; POTRAC, Paul; JONES, Robyn. ‘Studentship’ and ‘impression management’ in an advanced soccer coach education award. Sport, Education and Society, v. 15, n. 3, p. 299–314, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2010.493311
CIAMPOLINI, Vitor et al. Teaching strategies adopted in coach education programs: analysis of publications from 2009 to 2015. Journal of Physical Education, v. 30, n. 1, p. 1–14, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v30i1.3006
CÔTÉ, Jean; GILBERT, Wade. An integrative definition of coaching effectiveness and expertise. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, v. 4, n. 3, p. 307–323, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/174795409789623892
CRESWELL, John. Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. 4. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2014.
CULLEN, Roxanne; HARRIS, Michael; HILL, Reinhold. The learner-centered curriculum: design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2012.
CUSHION, Christopher; ARMOUR, Kathy; JONES, Robyn. Coach education and continuing professional development: experience and learning to coach. Quest, v. 55, v. 3, p. 215–230, 2003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2003.10491800
FRANCO, Maria Amélia Santoro. Prática docente universitária e a construção coletiva de conhecimentos: possibilidades de transformações no processo ensino-aprendizagem. São Paulo: USP/Pró Reitoria de Graduação, 2009. (Cadernos de Pedagogia Universitária)
GALATTI, Larissa Rafaela; SANTOS, Yura Yuka Sato dos; KORSAKAS, Paula. A coach developers’narrative on scaffolding a learner-centredcoaching course in Brazil. International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 6, n. 3, p. 339-348, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2018-0084
GANO-OVERWAY, Lori; DIEFFENBACH, Kristen. Current practices in United States higher education coach education programs. International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 6, n. 2, p. 226–233, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2019-0013
GORDON, Neil. Flexible Pedagogies: technology-enhanced learning. Heslington: The Higher Education Academy, 2014.
HENNINK, Monique. Focus group discussions: understanding qualitative research. New York: Oxford University Press, 2014.
INTERNATIONAL COUNCIL FOR COACHING EXCELLENCE. ICCE standards for higher education bachelor coaching degree programmes, 2016. Disponível em: https://icce.ws/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/icds-draft-4-final-november-23.pdf. Acesso em: 2 jul. 2023.
JONES, Robyn (org.). The sports coach as educator. London: Routledge, 2006.
JONNAERT, Phillippe; DEFISE, Rosette. Currículo e competências. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010.
LINCOLN, Yvonna; LYNHAM, Susan; GUBA, Egon. Paradigmitic controversies, contradiction, and emerging confluences, revisited. In: DENZIN, Norman; LINCOLN, Yvonna. (ed.). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. London: Sage, 2018. p. 108–150.
MARCELO, Carlos. Desenvolvimento profissional docente: passado e futuro. Sísifo: revista de Ciências da Educação, v. 8, p. 7–22, jan./abr. 2009. Disponível em: https://unitau.br/files/arquivos/category_1/MARCELO___Desenvolvimento_Profissional_Docente_passado_e_futuro_1386180263.pdf. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2023.
MCCOMBS, Barbara. Reducing the achievement GAP. Society, v. 37, p. 29–36, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-000-1034-x
MCCOMBS, Barbara; VAKILI, Donna. A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teachers College Record, v. 107, n. 8, p. 1582–1600, 2005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9620.2005.00534.x
MESQUITA, Isabel et al. Coach learning and coach education: Portuguese expert coaches’ perspective. The Sport Psychologist, v. 28, n. 2, p. 124–136, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/tsp.2011-0117
MESQUITA, Isabel. O valor das pedagogias críticas na formação de treinadores com mente de qualidade. Revista Portuguesa de Ciências do Desporto, v. 17, n. S1, p. 223–233, 2018.
MILISTETD, Michel et al. Coaching and coach education in Brazil. International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 1, n. 3, p. 165–172, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2014-0103
MILISTETD, Michel et al. Learner-centered teaching in a university-based coach education: first attempts through action research inquiry. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, v. 14, n. 3, p. 294–309, 2019a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954119842957
MILISTETD, Michel et al. Making direct teaching more learner-centered in university-based coach education courses. In: CALLARY, Betina; GEARITY, Bryan (ed.). Coach education and development in sport. London: Routledge, 2019b. p. 7–19.
MILISTETD, Michel et al. Sports coach education: guidelines for the systematization of pedagogical practices in bachelor program in Physical Education. Journal of Physical Education, v. 28, n. 1, p. 1–14, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4025/jphyseduc.v28i1.2849
MILISTETD, Michel et al. Student-coaches perceptions about their learning activities in the university context. Revista Brasileira de Ciências do Esporte, v. 40, n. 3, p. 281–287, 2018a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbce.2018.03.005
MILISTETD, Michel et al. The learner-centred status of a Brazilian university coach education program. International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 5, n. 2, p. 105–115, 2018b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0075
MOON, Jennifer. A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer, 2004.
MORGAN, Kevin. et al. Changing the face of coach education: using ethno-drama to depict lived realities. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, v. 18, n. 5, p. 520–533, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2012.690863
NELSON, Lee; CUSHION, Christopher; POTRAC, Paul. Enhancing the provision of coach education: the recommendations of UK coaching practitioners. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, v. 18, n. 2, p. 204–218, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17408989.2011.649725
NELSON, Lee; CUSHION, Christopher; POTRAC, Paul. Formal, nonformal and informal coach learning: a holistic conceptualisation. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, v. 1, n. 3, p. 247–259, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1260/174795406778604627
NEVES, Andressa Soares de Camargo; GUERREIRO, José Manoel Amadio; AZEVEDO, Gisele Regina de. Avaliando o portfólio do estudante: uma contribuição para o processo de ensino-aprendizagem. Avaliação, v. 21, n. 1, p. 199–220, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1414-40772016000100010
PAQUETTE, Kyle et al. A sport federation’s attempt to restructure a coach education program using constructivist principles. International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 1, n. 2, p. 75–85, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2013-0006
PAQUETTE, Kyle; TRUDEL, Pierre. Learner-centered coach education: practical recommendations for coach development administrators. International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 5, n. 2, p. 169–175, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0084
PIGGOTT, David. Coaches’ experiences of formal coach education: a critical sociological investigation. Sport, Education and Society, v. 17, n. 4, p. 535–554, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.608949
RAMOS, Valmor et al. A aprendizagem profissional - as representações de treinadores desportivos de jovens: quatro estudos de caso. Motriz, v. 17, n. 2, p. 280–291, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5016/1980-6574.2011v17n2p280
REDDAN, Gregory; MCNALLY, Brenton; CHIPPERFIELD, Janine. Flipping the classroom in an undergraduate sports coaching course. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, v. 11, n. 2, p. 270–278, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747954116637497
ROBERTS, Simon J.; RYRIE, Angus. Socratic case-method teaching in sports coach education: reflections of students and course tutors. Sport, Education and Society, v. 19, n. 1, p. 63–79, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2011.632626
RODRIGUES, Heitor de Andrade; PAES, Roberto Rodrigues; SOUZA NETO, Samuel de. A construção da identidade na socialização profissional de treinadores. Revista Brasileira de Educação Física e Esporte, v. 32, n. 3, p. 427–441, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11606/1807-5509201800030427
SALLES, William das Neves. Desenvolvimento do ensino centrado no aprendiz: estratégias, percepções e implicações à formação inicial universitária em Educação Física. 2019. 438 f. Tese (Doutorado em Educação Física) - Centro de Desportos, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2019.
STOSZKOWSKI, John; COLLINS, Dave. Nirvana or never-never land: does heutagogy have a place in coach development? International Sport Coaching Journal, v. 4, n. 3, p. 353–358, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/iscj.2017-0001
STOSZKOWSKI, John; MCCARTHY, Liam. “Who wouldn’t want to take charge of their learning?” Student views on learner autonomy, self-determination and motivation. Journal of Perspectives in Applied Academic Practice, v. 6, n. 2, p. 104–107, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14297/jpaap.v6i2.330
STRINGER, Ernest T. Action research. 3. ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2007.
TRIPP, David. Pesquisa-ação: uma introdução metodológica. Educação e Pesquisa, v. 31, n. 3, p. 443–466, 2005. Disponível em: https://www.scielo.br/j/ep/a/3DkbXnqBQqyq5bV4TCL9NSH/?format=pdf&lang=pt. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2023.
TRUDEL, Pierre; CULVER, Diane; RICHARD, Jean-Paul. Peter Jarvis: lifelong coach learning. In: NELSON, Lee; GROOM, Ryan; POTRAC, Paul (ed.). Learning in sport coaching: theory and application. New York: Routledge, 2016. p. 202–214.
TRUDEL, Pierre; CULVER, Diane; WERTHNER, Peny. Looking at coach development from the coach-learner’s perspective. In: POTRAC, Paul; GILBERT, Wade; DENISON, Jim (ed.). de Campinas, UNICAMP, número do protocolo 72311917.2.0000.540
UNICAMP. Faculdade de Ciências Aplicadas. Projeto pedagógico do curso de ciências do esporte, 2018.
VAN MULLEM, Pete; BRUNNER, Dave. Developing a successful coaching philosophy: a step-by-step approach. Strategies, v. 26, n. 3, p. 29–34, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08924562.2013.779873
VILLAS BOAS, Benigna Maria de Freitas. O portfólio no curso de Pedagogia: ampliando o diálogo entre professor e aluno. Educação e Sociedade, v. 26, n. 90, p. 291–306, 2005. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0101-73302005000100013
VITÓRIO, Sabrina Lima; YAMANAKA, Guilherme Kioshi; MAZZEI, Leandro Carlos. Diagnóstico dos cursos acadêmicos em educação física e (ciências do) esporte no Brasil. In: CONGRESSO DE CIÊNCIA DO DESPORTO, 7., E SIMPÓSIO INTERNACIONAL DE CIÊNCIA DO DESPORTO, 6., Campinas, 2019. Anais... Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, SP, 2019.
WEIMER, Maryellen. Learner-centered teaching: five keys changes to practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2013.
WOHLFARTH, Dede et al. Student perceptions of learner-centered teaching. InSight: a journal of scholarly teaching, v. 3, n. 2, p. 67–74, 2008. Disponível em: https://insightjournal.park.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/8-Student-Perceptions-of-Learner-Centered-Teaching.pdf. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2023.
WOODBURN, Andrea. Experiential learning for undergraduate student-coaches. In: CALLARY, Bettina; GEARITY, Bryan (ed.). Coach education and development in sport. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Movimento
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Movimento adopts the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) for approved and published works. This means that authors:
- keep their copyrights and grant right of first publication to the journal; and
- as long as the authors’ names and Movimento’s initial publication rights are acknowledged, the authors may share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially).
More information at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
