Um dilema acerca da internacionalização do Kendo como Budo

Zan-Shin japonés y Jon-Shim coreano

Autores

  • Yoshiko Oda Faculty of Sports & Health Studies, Hosei University. Machida City, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Kevin Krein University of Alaska Southeast (UAS). Juneau, AK, United States

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.143566

Palavras-chave:

Esporte, Artes Marciais, Kendo, Budo

Resumo

Enquanto os praticantes de kendo fora do Japão, especialmente na Coreia do Sul, têm defendido sua inclusão como esporte olímpico, as organizações japonesas de kendo têm resistido. Argumentamos que, se o kendo adotasse a forma de um esporte internacional de tipo olímpico, seu valor como forma de arte cultural seria reduzido. O kendo, em suas regras e estruturas formais, encarna a cultura e as ideias tradicionais japonesas. Podemos ver isso ao considerar o significado do termo japonês “zan-shin”, que desempenha um papel significativo na arbitragem do kendo, e sua tradução coreana como “jon-shim”. Embora “jon-shim” capture alguns dos aspectos práticos e mais observáveis de “zan-shin”, ele não tem a mesma história e significado cultural. Isso resulta em atitudes diferentes em relação à atividade e comportamentos distintos na competição. Concluímos que, embora a competição internacional seja benéfica para o kendo, o conceito japonês de “zan-shin” deve ser mantido tanto na competição quanto no treinamento.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Yoshiko Oda, Faculty of Sports & Health Studies, Hosei University. Machida City, Tokyo, Japan.

Faculty of Sports & Health Studies, Hosei University. Machida City, Tokyo, Japan.

Kevin Krein, University of Alaska Southeast (UAS). Juneau, AK, United States

University of Alaska Southeast, United States

Referências

ALL JAPAN KENDO FEDERATION. Kendo teaching guidelines. 2008. Kigamae, p. 158; Migamae, p. 166.

BENESCH, Oleg. Olympic samurai: Japanese martial arts between sports and self-cultivation. Sport in History, v. 40, n. 3, p. 328-355, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17460263.2020.1739739

BENNETT, Alexander. The Black Ships of Kendo – South Korea: The International Popularization of Kendo and the Olympic In: YAMADA, Shoji; BENNETT Alexander. Martial Arts in Japanese Education: Training for Herat-Mind, Skill, and Body in the 21st Century. Tokyo: Meiji Tosho, 2007. p. 336-359.

HOSHIKAWA, Tamotsu. Why is importance placed on form in the martial arts? – centered in Kendo. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, v. 35, n. 11, p. 831-835, 1985.

HOSHIKAWA, Tamotsu; ODA, Yoshiko; EDO, Koichi. What is Japanese culture and traditional behavior as a learning content in martial arts? - Kendo’s Yuko-datotsu and zanshin. Journal of Health, Physical Education and Recreation, v. 64, n. 2, p.124-129, 2014.

II NAOSUKE; edited and revised text by II, Masahiro; KURASAWA, Yukihiro. Ichigo-ichie: A once in a lifetime encounter. Kyoto: Ittoen-Tokeisya, 1988. p. 115-116.

II NAOSUKE, recension and annotation by Toda. Chanoyu-ichie-shu: Kan-ya-sawa (Quiet Night Tea Celemony). Iwanami-bunko, p.132-133, 2012.

ILUNDÁIN-AGURRUZA, Jesús. Reflections on a Katana: the Japanese pursuit of performative mastery. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8, n. 4, p. 455-50, 2014a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1026632

ILUNDÁIN-AGURRUZA, Jesús. Riding the Wind: consummate performance, phenomenology, and skillful fluency. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8, n. 4, p. 374-419, 2014b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1026630

INTERNATIONAL KENDO FEDERATION. The Regulations of Kendo Shiai and Shinpan. The Subsidiary Rules of Kendo Shiai and Shinpan and the Guidelines for Kendo Shiai and Shinpan, 2017. Yuko-datotsu, p. 5; Torikeshi of yuko-datotasu. p. 14.

KREIN, Kevin. Philosophy and nature sports. New York: Routledge, 2019.

KREIN, Kevin. Sport, nature and worldmaking. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 2, n. 3, p. 285-301, 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511320802475713

LEE, Jong-rim. Orthodox kendo textbook – Jong-hyeong. Lineage of School Heads, Samhomedia, 2010. p. 157.

MARTINKOVA, Irena; PARRY, Jim. Martial categories: clarification and classification. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 43, n. 1, p. 143-162, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2015.1038829

MARTINKOVA, Irena. Inclusion as the value of eligibility rules in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 50, n. 3, p. 345-364, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2023.2268700

MIYAMOTO, Musashi. recension and annotation by WATANABE, Ichiro. Five Rings: Gorin-no-sho. Tokyo: Iwanami-Bunko, 1985/1999. p. 152.

MURATA, Naoki. Internationalization of Judo. Nihon-Budokan, 2011.

NAGAKI, Kosuke. Succession and transformation of Kano’s judo philosophy. Kazama-Shobo, 2008.

NAKAMURA Tamio. Why Martial Arts Now?: comments on culture and tradition, Nippon Budokan, 2007. p. 270-271.

NISHIHIRA, Tadashi. Keiko no shiso (Thoughts of practice). Shunjyu-sha, 2019. p.18-28.

NISHIMURA, Hideki. Aesthetic of restraint in sports. Sekaishisosha, 2009. p. 86-89.

ODA, Yoshiko; KONDO, Yoshitaka. The concept of Yuko-datotsu in Kendo: interpreted from the Aesthetics of Zanshin. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 8 n. 1, p. 3-15, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2013.873072

ODA, Yoshiko; KONDO, Yoshitaka. Challenges for the international development of Japanese Kendo: focusing on the conflict with Korean Kumdo, Journal of Japan Society for the Philosophy of Sport and Physical Education, v. 43, n. 2, p. 125-140, 2012.

ODA, Yoshiko. Nikkan KENDO – KENDO to KUMDO no soukoku; Japanese KENDO and Korean KUMDO: conflict and future. Tokyo: Seikyusya, 2017.

PARK, Dong-chull. Aesthetics of Kendo Motion. The researcher report. The Annual Report of Budo and Sports Research Institute of International Budo University, v. 6, p. 207-211, 2001.

REID, Heather L. Sport, Philosophy, and the Quest for Knowledge. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 36, n. 1, p. 40-49, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2009.9714744

SHIOIRI, Hiroyuki. Considering the internationalization of kendo. edited by All Japan Educational University Kendo Federation. Seminar Kendo, 1992. p. 249-257.

SHOGAKUKAN; KUMSUNG Publishing Eds. Korean-Japanese Dictionary, 1993/2012. p.1574.

SHOGAKUKAN. Unabridged dictionary of the Japanese language, 1972/2001. p. 334.

TOMOZOE Hidenori. Martial Arts as a thought experiment: comparative culture of Martial Arts and Sports. Comments on Modern Sport, n. 21, p.15-16, 2009.

Publicado

2024-11-12

Como Citar

ODA, Y.; KREIN, K. Um dilema acerca da internacionalização do Kendo como Budo : Zan-Shin japonés y Jon-Shim coreano. Movimento, [S. l.], v. 30, p. e30053, 2024. DOI: 10.22456/1982-8918.143566. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/Movimento/article/view/143566. Acesso em: 6 maio. 2025.

Edição

Seção

Em foco #1