Estudos da deficiência na produção acadêmica
uma cartografia nas arenas do Norte-global
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.1590/18070337-122287Mots-clés :
estudos da deficiência, modelo social, produção científica, sociologia do conhecimento, bibliometriaRésumé
Qual seria o lugar dos estudos da deficiência na prática científica contemporânea? Em que medida a circulação de investigações que questionam ontologias capacitistas e posicionam a deficiência como um marcador social relevante para a compreensão das diferentes formas de apagamento e de opressão social estaria influenciando o desenvolvimento de novas agendas de pesquisa? A partir de um mapeamento de 2.864 documentos registrados nas bases de dados Scopus e Web of Science entre os anos de 1956 e 2020, este artigo procura descrever as tendências gerais de produção e a estrutura intelectual dos estudos da deficiência ao longo das últimas sete décadas. A intenção é oferecer um mapa atualizado dos principais periódicos, autores e autoras, repertórios teóricos, enfoques heurísticos e sujeitos políticos que disputam visibilidade e legitimidade no cenário internacional da produção de conhecimentos a respeito da deficiência. Os resultados desta investigação sugerem que a deficiência é uma categoria plural e em construção nos meios científicos especializados; simultaneamente analítica e política, ela se organiza em torno de múltiplas áreas que participam da coprodução de distintos modelos de interpretação e de construção das vidas das pessoas com deficiência.
Téléchargements
Références
ALBRECHT, Gary L. American pragmatism, sociology and the development of disability studies. In: BARNES, Colin; BARTON, Len; OLIVER, Mike. (eds.). Disability studies today. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd., 2002. p. 18-37.
ARIA, Massimo; CUCCURULLO, Corrado. Bibliometrix: an R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, v. 11, n. 4, p. 959-975, 2017.
BARNES, Colin. A legacy of oppression: a history of disability in western culture. In: BARTON, Len; OLIVER, Mike. (eds.). Disability studies: past, present and future. Leeds: The Disability Press, 1997. p. 3-24.
BARNES, Colin. What a difference a decade makes: reflections on doing “emancipatory” disability research. Disability & Society, v. 18, n. 1, p. 3-17, 2003.
BLOCK, Pamela; KASNITZ, Devva; NISHIDA, Akemi; POLLARD, Nick. Occupying disability: an introduction. In: BLOCK, Pamela et al. (eds.) Occupying disability: critical approaches to community, justice, and decolonizing disability. Dordrecht: Springer, 2016. p. 3-14.
CALLON, Michel. Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. In: BIJKER, Wiebe; HUGHES, Thomas P.; PINCH, Trevor. (eds.). The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge: Mass., Mit Press, 1986. p. 83-103.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. Eugenics in disguise? Law, technologies and negotiating the “problem” of “disability”. Australian Feminist Law Journal, v. 14, n. 1, p. 55-70, 2000.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. Legislating disability: negative ontologies and the government of legal identities. In: TREMAIN, S. (ed.). Foucault and the government of disability. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press, 2005. p. 108-132.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. Litigation neurosis: Pathological responses or rational subversion? Disability Studies Quarterly, v. 25, n. 4, 2006.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. States of exceptionality: provisional disability, its mitigation and citizenship. Socio Legal Review, v. 3, n. 1, p. 28–50, 2007.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. Exploring internalized ableism using critical race theory. Disability & Society, v. 23, n. 2, p. 151-162, 2008.
CAMPBELL, Fiona K. Contours of ableism: the production of disability and abledness. New York: Palgrave Mcmillan, 2009.
CARNIEL, Fagner. Agenciar palavras, fabricar sujeitos: sentidos da educação inclusiva no Paraná. Horizontes Antropológicos, v. 24, n. 50, p. 83-116, 2018.
CARNIEL, Fagner; MELLO, Anahí G. Quem escreve pela deficiência no pensamento social brasileiro? Contemporânea - Revista de Sociologia da UFScar, v. 11, n. 2, p. 490-505, 2021.
DAVIS, Lennard J. Enforcing normalcy: disability, deafness, and the body. London: Verso, 1995.
DIAS, Adriana A. M. Observando o ódio: entre uma etnografia do neonazismo e a biografia de David Lane. Tese (Doutorado em Antropologia Social), Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 2018.
DINIZ, Debora; MEDEIROS, Marcelo; SQUINCA, Flávia. Reflexões sobre a versão em português da Classificação Internacional de Funcionalidade, Incapacidade e Saúde. Cad. Saúde Pública, v. 23, n. 10, p. 2507-2510, 2007.
EDITORIAL. Disability, Handicap & Society, v. 1, n. 1, p. 3-4, 1986.
FERREIRA, Naidson C. S.; SOUZA, Calixto J.; SILVA, João. H.; FERNANDES, Woquiton L. Bibliometric study about educational policies for people with disabilities, between 1997 to 2014. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, v. 11, n. 3, p. 817-829, 2017.
FREIRE, Paulo. Pedagogy of hope: reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2004.
GOODLEY, Dan. Dis/entangling critical disability studies. Disability & Society, v. 28, n. 5, p. 631-644, 2013.
GOODLEY, Dan. Disability Studies: An interdisciplinary introduction. London: Sage, 2016.
GOODLEY, Dan; LAWTHOM, Rebecca. Critical disability studies, Brexit and Trump: a time of neoliberal–ableism. Rethinking History, v. 23, n. 2, p. 233-251, 2019.
HARAWAY, Donna. Simians, cyborgs, and women: the reinvention of nature. New York: Routledge, 1991.
HAMPTON, Jameel. Peace news and radical disability writing in 1970s Britain: Perceptions of welfare and the welfare state. Disability Studies Quarterly, v. 40, n. 2, 2020.
HOGE, William F. The disability rights movement: list of resources. Excellence in Education Journal, v. 8, n. 2, p. 51-63, 2019.
HUBBARD, Ruth. Prenatal diagnosis and eugenic ideology. Women's Studies International Forum, v. 8, n. 6, p. 567-576, 1985.
HUYARD, Caroline. How did uncommon disorders become “rare diseases”? History of a boundary object. Sociology of Health & Illness, v. 31, n. 4, p. 463-477, 2009.
JENKS, Andrew. Crip theory and the disabled identity: why disability politics needs impairment. Disability & Society, v. 34, n. 3, p. 449-469, 2019.
KHOO, Selina; LI, Chunxiao; ANSARI, Payam. The top 50 most cited publications in disability sport: a bibliometric analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, v. 125, n. 3, p. 525-545, 2018.
KITTAY, Eva. F. The ethics of care, dependence, and disability. Ratio Juris, v. 24, n. 1, p. 49-58, 2011.
LINTON, Simi. Disability studies/not disability studies. Disability & Society, v. 13, n. 4, p. 525-539, 1998.
LOPES, Pedro. Deficiência como categoria do Sul global: primeiras aproximações com a África do Sul. Rev. Estud. Fem., v. 27, n. 3, e66923, 2019.
MEEKOSHA, Helen. Decolonising disability: thinking and acting globally. Disability & Society, v. 26, n. 6, p. 667-682, 2011.
MCRUER, Robert. Critical investments: AIDS, Christopher Reeve, and queer/disability studies. Journal of Medical Humanities, v. 23, n. 1, p. 221-237, 2002.
MCRUER, Robert. Crip eye for the normate guy: Queer theory and the disciplining of disability studies. PMLA, v. 120, n. 2, p. 586-592, 2005.
MCRUER, Robert. Crip theory: Cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: New York University Press, 2006.
MCRUER, Robert; MOLLOW, Anna. Introduction. In: MCRUER, Robert; MOLLOW, Anna (eds.). Sex and Disability. London: Duke University Press, 2012.
MOORE, Mike. Disability, activism and the academy: time for renewal? Disability & Society, v. 34, n. 7-8, p. 1025-1027, 2019.
OLIVER, Mike. The politics of disablement. London: Macmillan, 1990.
OLIVER, Mike. Changing the social relations of research production? Disability, Handicap & Society, v. 7, n. 2, p. 101-114, 1992.
OLIVER, Mike. Activism and the academy: losing the ideological and material battles. Disability & Society, v. 34, n. 7-8, p. 1028-1033, 2019.
OLIVER, Mike; BARNES, Colin. Back to the future: the World Report on Disability. Disability & Society, v. 27, n. 4, p. 575-579, 2012.
PATTERSON, Lindsey. Points of access: rehabilitation centers, summer camps, and student life in the making of disability activism, 1960-1973. Journal of Social History, v. 46, n. 2, p. 473-499, 2012.
QUERG, H. Zur Frage der Frühinvalidität; Untersuchungen bei der Versicherungs-Anstalt, Berlin 1951-1953 [Problem of early disability; studies of the Berlin Institute of Social Security, 1951-1953]. Zeitschrift fur arztliche Fortbildung, v. 50, n. 6, p. 263-268, 1956.
R CORE TEAM. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. V. 3.5.3. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2019.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom. Choices and rights: eugenics, genetics and disability equality. Disability & Society, v. 13, n. 5, p. 665-681, 1998.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom. “Losing the plot”? Medical and activist discourses of contemporary genetics and disability. Sociology of Health & Illness, v. 21, n. 1, p. 669-688, 1999.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom. Help. Birmingham: Venture Press, 2000.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom. Disability studies today and tomorrow. Sociology of Health & Illness, v. 27, n. 1, p. 138-148, 2005.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom. Disability rights and wrongs. New York: Routledge, 2006.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom. The social model of disability. In: DAVIS, Lennard J. (ed.). The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge, 2010. p. 197-2004.
SHAKESPEARE, Tom; WATSON, Nicholas. The social model of disability: an outdated ideology? In: BARNARTT, Sharon N.; ALTMAN, Barbara (eds.). Exploring theories and expanding methodologies: where are we and where do we need to go? Amsterdam: JAI, 2001. p. 9-22.
SHILDRICK, Margrit. Critical disability studies: rethinking the conventions for the age of postmodernity. In: WATSON, Nick; ROULSTONE, Alan; THOMAS, Carol (eds.). Routledge handbook of disability studies. London: Routledge, 2012. p. 30-41.
SOUZA, Bruna A. S.; CARNIEL, Fagner. Quando o raro se torna comum: uma trajetória no mundo da adrenoleucodistrofia. Temáticas, v. 28, n. 55, p. 271-300, 2020.
THOMAS, Carol. Disability theory: key ideas, issues and thinkers. In: BARNES, C.; BARTON, Len; OLIVER, Mike. (eds.). Disability studies today. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd, 2002. p. 38-57.
THOMAS, Carol. Times change, but things remain the same. Disability & Society, v. 34, n. 7-8, p. 1040-1041, 2019.
UN- United Nations. World program of action concerning people with disabilities. New York: United Nations, 1982.
UPIAS - Union of the Physically Impaired against Segregation. Fundamental principles of disability. London: UPIAS, 1976.
VEHMAS, Simo; WATSON, Nicholas. Moral wrongs, disadvantages, and disability: a critique of critical disability studies. Disability & Society, v. 29, n. 4, p. 638-650, 2014.
WHO – World Health Organization. International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Genève: WHO, 1980.
WHO – World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health. Genève: WHO, 2001.
WHO – World Health Organization. World report on disability. Genève: WHO, 2011.
Téléchargements
Publiée
Comment citer
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
© Fagner Carniel, Adriana Abreu Magalhães Dias, Adonai José Lacruz 2023
Ce travail est disponible sous la licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International .
Autores que publicam nesta revista concordam com os seguintes termos:
Autores mantém os direitos autorais e concedem à revista o direito de primeira publicação, com o trabalho simultaneamente licenciado sob a Licença Creative Commons Attribution que permite o compartilhamento do trabalho com reconhecimento da autoria e publicação inicial nesta revista.
