Ossicular pathology in chronic otitis media
Clinical implications
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22491/2357-9730.125123Keywords:
Chronic otitis media, ossicular pathology, exploratory tympanotomyAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the presence of ossicular pathologies in chronic otitis media in patients with perforated and those with and without tympanic membranes.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was based on histological analysis through optic microscopy. Out of 1.382 human temporal bones, we selected 144 that presented with tissue alterations compatible with chronic otitis media. These bones were collected from 96 individuals, 55 male and 41 female, aged from 10 to 88 years. Only 28 had perforated tympanic membranes.
RESULTS: The analysis of the temporal bones indicated as the most common findings granulation tissue, ossicular alterations, tympanosclerosis, tympanic perforation, and cholesterol granuloma and cholesteatoma. The alterations found in this study revealed that the anvil is the most commonly affected ossicle, followed by the stapes and the malleus.
CONCLUSIONS: The comparative analysis of perforated and non-perforated human temporal bones indicated that the two groups were similar regarding ossicular pathology.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).