La trayectoria filosófica de Scott Kretchmar
explorando cómo significan el deporte y la actividad física
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-8918.143363Palabras clave:
Deporte, Ética, Filosofía del Deporte, JuegoResumen
Scott Kretchmar es una figura fundamental de la filosofía del deporte. Su influencia comenzó con su primer artículo revisado por pares en 1972, y sus contribuciones siguen siendo significativas tras su jubilación. En 1989, se convirtió en uno de los primeros filósofos del deporte en ingresar a la National Academy of Kinesiology de los Estados Unidos, alcanzando la cúspide profesional con el Premio Clark W. Hetherington en 2021. Este artículo traza su trayectoria académica y profesional, y repasa sus principales contribuciones académicas, categorizándolas en cuatro núcleos básicos de preocupaciones de investigación interrelacionadas: (a) la metafísica del jugar, los juegos, el deporte y la competición; (b) el papel de la educación física; (c) la ética del deporte; y (d) la creación de significado y los aspectos espirituales del deporte. Sin ser exhaustivo, este artículo destaca la labor de Kretchmar en establecer y expandir la filosofía del deporte, subrayando su impacto perdurable.Descargas
Citas
FRALEIGH, Warren P. Right actions in sport: ethics for contestants. Champaign: Human Kinetics Publishers, 1984.
GEERTZ, Clifford. Available light: anthropological reflections on philosophical topics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.
HARDMAN, Alun R. Practical philosophy of sport and physical activity, 2nd ed. By R. Scott Kretchmar. Published 2005 by Human Kinetics, Champaign, IL. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 34, n. 1, p. 97–99, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2007.9714713
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. A phenomenological analysis of the Other in sport. 1971. Dissertation (Master in Philosophy) – University of Southern California, 1971.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Ontological possibilities: sport as play. Philosophic Exchange, v. 3, n. 1, p. 113–122, 1972. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/233573485.pdf. Accessed on: Sept. 4, 2024.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. From test to contest: an analysis of two kinds of counterpoint in sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 2, n. 1, p. 23–30, 1975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1975.10654094
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Ethics and sport: An overview. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 10, n. 1, p. 21–32, 1983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1983.9714398
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. The strange supremacy of knowledge in sport from the moral point of view: a response to Fraleigh. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 13, n. 1, p. 79–88, 1986. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1986.9714443
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Toward a stronger position for physical education in higher education: three recommendations. Quest, v. 40, n. 1, p. 47–55, 1988. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1988.10483886
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. On beautiful games. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 16, n. 1, p. 34–43, 1989. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.1989.9714467
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Practical philosophy of sport and physical activity. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1994.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Philosophy of sport. In: MASSENGALE, John; SWANSON, Richard (ed.). The history of exercise and sport science. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 1997. p. 181–202.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Movement subcultures: sites for meaning. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, v. 71, n. 5, p. 19–25, 2000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2000.10605140
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Walking Barry Bonds: The ethics of the intentional walk. In: GREENE, E. Richard; VERNEZZE, Peter (ed.). Baseball and philosophy: thinking outside the batter’s box. Chicago: Open Court, 2004. p. 261–272.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Game flaws. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 1, p. 36–48, 2005a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2005.9714669
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Practical philosophy of sport and physical activity. 2. ed. Champaign: Human Kinetics, 2005b.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Ten more reasons for quality physical education. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, v. 77, n. 9, p. 6–9, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07303084.2006.10597932
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. What to do with meaning? A research conundrum for the 21st century. Quest, v. 59, n. 4, p. 373–383, 2007. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2007.10483559
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. The increasing utility of elementary school physical education: a mixed blessing and unique challenge. The Elementary School Journal, v. 108, n. 3, p. 161–170, 2008a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/529099
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. The utility of silos and bunkers in the evolution of kinesiology. Quest, v. 60, n. 1, p. 3–12, 2008b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2008.10483564
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Should philosophy of sport matter more? Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research, v. 49, n. 1, p. 5–12, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/v10141-010-0013-1
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Why dichotomies make it difficult to see games as gifts of God. In: PARRY, Jim; NESTI, Mark; WATSON, Nick J. (ed.). Theology, ethics and transcendence in sports. Londres: Routledge, 2011. p. 185–200.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. C. H. McCloy Lecture: symbols, conventions, games, Eleanor Metheny, and the evolution of human intelligence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, v. 84, n. 2, p. 131–138, 2013a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2013.787345
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Hard-won sporting achievements and spiritual humility: Are they compatible? In: WATSON, Nick J.; PARKER, Andrew (ed.). Sports and Christianity: Historical and contemporary perspectives. Londres: Routledge, 2013b. p. 269–286.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. “A Games” and their relationship to T and E games. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 9, n. 1, p. 47–57, 2015a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2015.1020853
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Pluralistic internalism. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 42, n. 1, p. 83–100, 2015b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2014.911101
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Simon on realism, fallibilism, and the power of reason. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 43, n. 1, p. 41–49, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2015.1112237
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Games and fiction: partners in the evolution of culture. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 11, n. 1, p. 12–25, 2017a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2017.1294554
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Sport, fiction, and the stories they tell. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 44, n. 1, p. 55–71, 2017b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00948705.2016.1277949
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. The ethics of flopping. In: LUMPKIN, Angela (ed.). Modern sport ethics: a reference handbook. 2. ed. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, 2017c. p. 145–148.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Gateways to culture: Play, games, metaphors, and institutions. Journal of Cognition and Culture, v. 18, n. 1–2, p. 47–65, 2018a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15685373-12340023
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Homo forte: A philosophical tribute to muscle. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 12, n. 4, p. 375–385, 2018b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2018.1493529
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Human evolution, movement, and intelligence: why playing games counts as smart. Quest, v. 70, n. 1, p. 1–11, 2018c. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.2017.1359636
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Amazement, gratitude and humility. National Academy of Kinesiology, v. 43, n. 2, p. 30–32, 2021a.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott. Large questions, small questions, and leaky ones too. Kinesiology Review, v. 10, n. 2, p. 111–118, 2021b. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2020-0060.
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott.; TORRES, Cesar R. Challenges, achievements, and uncertainties: the philosophy of sport since the 1980s. Kinesiology Review, v. 10, n. 3, p. 283–291, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/kr.2021-0012
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott; WHITE, John. A special issue on sport and spirituality. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 12, n. 1, p. 1–3, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2017.1414869
KRETCHMAR, R. Scott.; WATSON, Nick J. Chesterton on play, work, paradox, and Christian orthodoxy. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, v. 12, n. 1, p. 70–80, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17511321.2017.1291713
METHENY, Eleanor. How does a movement mean? Quest, v. 8, n. 1, p. 1–6, 1967. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00336297.1967.10519630
METHENY, Eleanor. Movement and meaning. Nova Iorque: McGraw-Hill, 1968.
OSTERHOUDT, Robert G. Introduction. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport, v. 1, p. 1–15, 1974.
SIMON, Robert L.; TORRES, Cesar R.; HAGER, Peter F. Fair play: the ethics of sport. Boulder: Westview, 2014.
SUITS, Bernard. What is a game? Philosophy of Science, v. 34, n. 2, p. 148–156, 1967.
TORRES, Cesar R. Introduction. In: TORRES, Cesar R. (ed.). Bloomsbury companion to the philosophy of sport. Londres: Bloomsbury, 2014. p. 1–14.
TORRES, Cesar R. R. Scott Kretchmar. In: Sport Studies. Routledge Resources Online. Routledge. (In press).
VAN DE MARS, H.; TORRES, Cesar R.; WIGGINS, D. K. Letter from Hans Van de Mars, Cesar R. Torres and David K. Wiggins to Lynda Ransdell. Cesar R. Torres Archives, 2021.
ZEIGLER, Earle F. History and status of American physical education and educational sport. Victoria: Trafford Publishing, 2005.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Movimento
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Los autores conservan los derechos de autor sobre los manuscritos presentados y conceden a Movimento el derecho a publicar el texto, de conformidad con la política de licencia abierta de la revista.
Movimento adopta la licencia Creative Commons Atribución 4.0 Internacional (CC BY 4.0), de conformidad con el modelo de Acceso Abierto (Open Access), que permite el acceso en línea, libre de restricciones (incluidas las económicas), a todos los textos científicos publicados por la revista.
Al presentar un manuscrito, los autores deberán declarar que conocen y aceptan las condiciones de la licencia de derechos de autor, la cual entrará en vigor en caso de que el manuscrito sea aceptado y publicado, conforme a los siguientes términos:
- El acceso abierto implica que el titular de los derechos de autor de un trabajo académico concede a terceros los derechos de uso mediante una licencia abierta (Creative Commons Attribution – CC BY 4.0).
- El acceso abierto garantiza el acceso gratuito e inmediato a los trabajos, permitiendo a cualquier usuario leer, descargar, copiar, distribuir, imprimir, buscar o enlazar el texto completo de los artículos, rastrearlos para su indexación, utilizarlos como datos para software o destinarlos a cualquier otro uso lícito.
Movimento alienta a los autores a autoarchivar los manuscritos aceptados en blogs personales, repositorios institucionales, redes sociales académicas y perfiles personales, siempre que se incluya la referencia bibliográfica completa de la versión publicada en el sitio web de la revista y/o en la colección SciELO.
