Compositionality and overlapping in biomedical terminology: alternatives for health interoperability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245263.196-223Keywords:
Ontology, Knowledge representation, Medical terminologies, Interoperability.Abstract
A paramount information source within clinical practice is the patient record , an information-filled document that already exists in electronic format. The inherint inherent ambiguity of theThe ambiguity inherent in medical discourse has hampered the much sought-after automatic integration between electronic health records since, at this stage, automated systems are unable to address the syntactic and semantic complexity of the human language. Even standard terminologies designed to address such complexity are unable to solve the issues involved because of the multiplicity of alternatives, in addition to the fact that they are created for different purposes and goals. All this has resulted in redundancy, rework, and overlapping between terms. This paper assumes that the issue of interoperability is complex and needs to be tackled on several fronts. One of these fronts, in the context of electronic healthcare records, involves two conceptual conditions: epistemological overlapping and term compositionality. After explaining those conditions, we make use of an ontology-based model created on previous research to design and to test a method that aims to compensate for the shortcomings of such conditions. The test was performed on a fragment of the International Classification of Diseases. We found that the aforementioned conceptual conditions are relevant aspects to be faced in seeking interoperability.Downloads
References
ALMEIDA, M. B.; FARINELLI, F. Ontologies for representation of Electronic Medical Records: the obstetric and neonatal ontology. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, [s. l.], v. 68, n. 11, p. 2529-2542, 2017.
ALMEIDA, M. B.; RIBEIRO, E. F.; BARCELOS, R. Toward a Document-Centered Ontological Theory for Information Architecture in corporations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, [s. l.], p. 1-19, 2020.
ALMEIDA, M. B.; RIBEIRO, E. F.; MACULAN, B. C. Ontologies and Classification: the unavoidable interplay between human reasoning and machine reasoning. In: QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE METHODS IN LIBRARIES INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE, 11., 2019, Florence. Proceedings […]. Florence: QQML, 2019. p. 1-13.
ALMEIDA, M. B.; SOUZA, R. R.; FONSECA, F. Semantics in the Semantic Web: a critical evaluation. Knowledge Organization Journal, Edmonton, v. 38, n. 3, p. 187-203, 2011.
ALMEIDA, M. B.; TEIXEIRA, L. M. D. Revisitando os fundamentos da classificação: uma análise crítica sobre teorias do passado e do presente. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, Belo Horizonte, p. 1-19, 2019. No prelo.
ANDRADE, A. Q. de. A linguagem médica utilizada em prontuários e suas representações em Sistemas de Informação: as ontologias e os modelos de informação. 2013. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Escola de Ciência da Informação, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2013.
BFO. Basic Formal Ontology: home. [S. l.], [2019]. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2019.
BODENREIDER, O.; SMITH, B.; BURGUN, A. The Ontology-Epistemology divide: a case study in medical terminology. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FORMAL ONTOLOGY AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2004, Torino. Proceedings […]. Torino: FOIS, 2004. p. 185-195.
BOWKER, G. C. The history of information infrastructures: the case of the international classification of diseases. Information Processing & Management, [s. l.], v. 32, n. 1, p. 49-61, 1996.
CAMPBELL, K. E.; OLIVER, D. E.; SHORTLIFE, E. H. UMLS: a collaborative approach to terminologic problems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, [s. l.], v. 5, n. 1, p 12-16, 1998.
DO. Disease Ontology: home. [S. l.]: Institute for Genome Sciences, [2019]. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2019.
ELKIN, P. L. et al. The role of compositionality in standartized problem generation. In: WORLD CONGRESS ON MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 9., 1998, Seoul. Proceedings […]. Seoul: MEDINFO, 1998. p. 660-664.
ELKIN, P. L. Theoretical foundations of terminology. In: ELKIN, P. L. (ed.). Terminology and terminological systems. London: Springer-Verlag, 2012. cap. 4, p. 51-70.
EMYGDIO, J. L.; FELIPE, E. R.; ALMEIDA, M. B. Aspectos do ciclo de vida de dados em processos de construção de ontologias biomédicas. (2019). In: SANTOS, C. C. (org.). Estudos interdisciplinares nas Ciências Exatas e da Terra e Engenharias. Ponta Grossa: Athena, 2019. cap. 11, p. 113-125.
FINE, G. On Ideas: Aristotle's Criticism of Plato's Theory of Forms. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship, 1995.
FREITAS, F.; SCHULZ, S.; MORAES, E. Pesquisa de terminologias e ontologias atuais em biologia e medicina. Revista Eletrônica de Comunicação Informação e Inovação em Saúde, Rio de Janeiro, v. 3, n. 1, p. 8-20, 2009.
GOOGLE. Google Scholar. [S. l.], [2019]. Acesso em: 30 jul. 2019.
GUBA, E. The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage Publications, 1990.
GUIZZARDI, G. Ontological Foundations for Structural Conceptual Models. 2005. Thesis (Doctorate in Computer Science) - Centre for Telematics and Information Technology, University of Twente, Enschede, 2005.
HESSEN, J. Teoria do Conhecimento. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.
IAO. Ontobee: Information Artifact Ontology. [S. l.]: University of Michigan Medical School, [2019]. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2019.
JUPP, S. et al. Document Navigation: ontologies or knowledge organisation systems. In: INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON NETWORK TOOLS AND APPLICATIONS IN BIOLOGY, 7, 2007, Palermo. Proceedings [...]. Palermo: University of Manchester, 2007. p. 1-7.
LAURENTI, R. et al. A Classificação Internacional de Doenças, a Família de Classificações Internacionais, a CID-11 e a Síndrome Pós-Poliomielite. Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria, São Paulo, v. 71, n. 9A, p. 3-10, 2013.
MACULAN, B. C. M. dos S. Estudo e aplicação de metodologia de reengenhharia de tesauro: reformulação do THESAGRO. 2014. Tese (Doutorado em Ciências da Informação) - Escola de Ciência da Informação, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2014.
MARCO-RUIZ, L. et al. Alignment of information models and domain ontologies. In: MARCO-RUIZ, L. et al. Ontology-based terminologies for healthcare: impact assessment and transitional consequences for implementation. Oslo: Norwegian Centre for E-health Research, 2017. cap. 8.
MERRILL, G. H. Ontological realism: methodology or misdirection? Applied Ontology, Amsterdam, v. 5, p. 79-108, 2010.
MURPHY, G. Conceptual Combination: the big book of concepts. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 2002
OGMS. Summary. [S. l.]: BioPortal, 4 May 2019a. Acesso em: 2 nov. 2019
OGMS. Welcome to BioPortal [...]. [S. l.]: BioPortal, 2019b. Acesso em: 7 nov. 2019.
RECTOR, A. L. Clinical terminology: why is it so hard? Methods of Information in Medicine, [S. l.], v. 38, n. 4, p. 239-252, 1999.
RUBIN, D. L.; SHAH, N. H.; NOY, N. Biomedical Ontologies: a functional perspective. Briefing in Bioinformatics, [S. l.], v. 9, n. 1, p. 75-90, 2008.
SCHULZ, S.; MARTINEZ-COSTA, C. How ontologies can improve semantic interoperability in health care. In: RIAÑO, D.; LENZ, R.; MIKSCH, S.; PELEG, M.; REICHERT, M.; TEN TEIJE, A. (ed.). Process Support and Knowledge Representation in Health Care: AIME 2013 Joint Workshop, KR4HC 2013/ProHealth 2013. Murcia: Springer International Publishing, 2013. p. 1-10. (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 8268).
SCHULZ, S.; MARTÍNEZ-COSTA, C.; MIÑARRO-GIMÉNEZ, C. Lexical ambiguity in SNOMED CT. In: ONTOLOGIES & DATA IN LIFE SCIENCES, 2017, Bolzano. Proceedings […]. Bolzano: [s. n.], 2017. p. 1-5.
SEARLE, J. R. Mente, linguagem e sociedade: filosofia no mundo real. Rio de Janeiro: Rocco, 2000.
SIWICKI, B. How FHIR 4 will drive interoperability progress in healthcare. [S. l.]: Healthcare IT News, 25 Apr. 2019. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2020.
SMITH, B. Administrative gender code system: the never-ending story. In: SMITH, B. Blog HL7 WATCH. [S. l.], 30 Jan. 2018. Acesso em: 2 nov. 2019
SMITH, B.; CEUSTERS, W. Ontological realism as a methodology for coordinated evolution of scientific ontologies. Applied Ontology, Amsterdam, v. 5, n. 3-4, p. 139-188, 2010.
SMITH, B.; MUNN, K.. Applied Ontology: an introduction. Frankfurt: Ontos-Verlag, 2008.
STENZHORN, H. et al. Adapting clinical ontologies in realworld environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 22, p. 3767-3780, 2008.
TEIXEIRA, L. M. D. Princípios ontológicos aplicados à classificação Internacional de doenças: alternativas para a busca por interoperabilidade semântica entre sistemas de prontuários eletrônicos de pacientes. 2019. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Escola de Ciência da Informação, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, 2019.
UJVARI, S. C.; ADONI, T. A história do século XX pelas descobertas da medicina. São Paulo: Contexto, 2014.
UKOLN. Interoperability focus: looking at interoperability. Bath, 2005. Acesso em: 4 jun. 2013.
WAND, Y.; WEBER, R. Mario Bunge’s ontology as a formal foundation for information systems concepts. In: WEINGARTNER, P.; DORN, J. W. G. (ed.). Studies on Mario Bunge’s treatise. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1990. p. 123-153.
WANG, K. Standard lexicons, coding systems and ontologies for interoperability and semantic computation in imaging. Journal of Digital Imaging, [s. l.], n. 31, p. 353-360, 2018.
WIKIPÉDIA. Daltonismo. [S. l.], abr. 2017. Acesso em: 22 abr. 2020.
ZINGANO, M. Unidade do gênero e outras unidades em Aristóteles: significação focal, relação de consecução, semelhança e analogia. Analytica, Rio de Janeiro, v. 17, n. 2, p. 395-432, 2013.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Livia Marangon Duffles Teixeira, Mauricio Barcellos Almeida

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors will keep their copyright and grant the journal with the right of first publication, the work licensed under License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which allows for the sharing of work and the recognition of authorship.
Authors can take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal, such as publishing in an institutional repository, acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
The articles are open access and free. In accordance with the license, you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.






