The Guardian’s editorial moderation policy strategies for online community of readers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19132/1807-8583.55.130210Keywords:
digital journalism, editorial moderation policy, interaction, comments, The GuardianAbstract
This article aims to analyze how the editorial policy’s moderation strategies of one of the largest newspapers in the world, The Guardian, paved the way for the consolidation of the online community of readers on the digital platform. It proposes to demonstrate how facing the problem of interaction (through comments) led The Guardian to build a strengthened community that is willing to take stances. The analysis presented here showcases some of the findings from a survey on reader participation in long form journalism. Through this case study, we revisit theorists to confront them with moderation practices and data from document-based research. It is assumed that the establishment of an online community of readers is anchored in the understanding and appreciation of the readership, as well as in encouraging loyalty to the journalistic project through effective interaction strategies and supported by the moderation of discussions.
Downloads
References
ANDERSON, I. et al. The dark side of The Guardian comments. The Guardian, London, 12 Apr. 2016.
CARVALHO, M. Ler jornais na era da desinformação. O Público, Lisboa, 21 nov. 2022.
COEN, S. et al. Talk like an expert: the construction of expertise in news comments concerning climate change. Public Understanding of Sciense, Thousand Oaks, v. 30, n. 4, p. 400-416, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/096366252098. Acesso em: 12 jun. 2023.
COMMUNITY standards and participation guidelines: 10 guidelines which we expect all participants in the Guardian’s community areas to abide by. The Guardian, London, 7 May 2009.
DIAZ NOCI, J. A new information landscape. Are convergence, participation and new devices killing (or saving) the press? In: GARCÍA, A. (coord.) Periodística y web 2.0: hacia la construcción de un nuevo modelo. Barcelona: Sociedad Española de Periodística, 2014. p. 13-40.
DOMINGO, D. Fostering and moderating citizen conversations. In: ZION, L.; CRAIG, D. (ed.). Ethics for digital journalists: emerging best practices. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis 2015. p. 159-173.
DOMINGO, D. et al. Participatory journalism practices in the media and beyond: an international comparative study of initiatives in online newspapers. Journalism Practice, London, v. 2, n. 3, p. 326-342, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/17512780802281065. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
FREQUENTLY asked questions about community on the Guardian website: everything you’ve ever wanted to know about community on the Guardian website. The Guardian, London, 7 May 2009.
GRAHAM, T; WRIGHT, S. A tale of two stories from ‘below the line’: comment fields at the Guardian. The International Journal of Press/Politics, Thousand Oaks, v. 20, n. 3, p. 317-338, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161215581926. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
LEE, E.-J.; JANG, Y. J.; CHUNG, M. When and how user comments affect news readers’ personal opinion: perceived public opinion and perceived news position as mediators. Digital Journalism, London, v. 9, n. 1, p. 42-63, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2020.1837638. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
LIU, J.; McLEOD, D. M. Pathways to news commenting and the removal of the comment system on news websites. Journalism, Thousand Oaks, v. 22, n. 4, p. 867-881, 2021. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919849954. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
MACEDO, K. C. de A. As interações entre leitores na seção The long read do The Guardian: entre a política editorial de moderação e a participação das audiências ativas. 2020. Dissertação (Mestrado em Comunicação) - Curso de Pós-Graduação em Comunicação, Setor de Artes, Comunicação e Design, Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, 2020.
MASIP, P. et al. Active audiences and journalism; involved citizens or motivated consumers? Brazilian Journalism Research, Brasília, v. 11, n. 1, p. 234 - 255, 2015. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.25200/BJR.v11n1.2015.815. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
MOLINA, M. Os melhores jornais do mundo: uma visão da imprensa internacional. São Paulo: Globo, 2008.
MOREIRA, S. V. Análise documental como método e técnica. In: DUARTE, J.; BARROS, A. (org.). Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa em comunicação. São Paulo: Atlas, 2005. p. 269-279.
QUADROS, C. I. A participação do público no webjornalismo. E-Compós, Brasília, v. 4, 2005. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.30962/ec.56. Acesso em: 26 jun.2023.
REINHOLD, H. The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic frontier. Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1993.
RUIZ, C. et al. Public sphere 2.0? The democratic qualities of citizen debates in on-line newspapers. International Journal of Press/Politics, Thousand Oaks, v. 16, n. 4, p. 463 - 487, 2011. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1940161211415849. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
RUSBRIDGER, A. Breaking news: the remaking of journalism and why it matters now. Edinburgh: Canongate Books, 2018.
TRYGG, S. Is comment free? Ethical, editorial and political problems of moderating online news. London: Polis/ London School of Economics and Political Science, 2012.
VERSTEEG, W.; TE MOLDER, H.; SNEIJDER, P. Listen to your body: participants’ alternative to science in online health discussions. Health, London, v. 22, n. 5, p. 432-450, 2018. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1177/1363459317695632. Acesso em: 26 jun. 2023.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Keyse Caldeira de Aquino Macedo, Claudia Irene de Quadros

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of works published in this journal belong to the authors, and the right of first publication is conceded to the journal. Due to the journal being of open access, the articles are of free use in research, educational and non-commercial activities.
Therefore, the journal uses the License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship.
Self-archiving (repository policy): authors are allowed to deposit all versions of their work in institutional or thematic repositories without embargo. It is requested, whenever possible, that the full bibliographic reference of the version published in Intexto (including the DOI link) be added to the archived text.
Intexto does not charge any article processing fees (article processing charge).