Assessing Sperm Selection Techniques: The Impact on Cell Viability Using Flow Cytometry
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22491/2357-9730.145120Keywords:
Sperm selection, Flow cytometry, Density gradient, Oxidative stress, Acrosome reactionAbstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different sperm selection techniques on seminal parameters and structural characteristics using flow cytometry, with a focus on cell viability, reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, and acrosome integrity. Methods: Semen samples from eight normospermic volunteers were subjected to two sperm selection techniques: simple washing and density gradient centrifugation. Post-processing, the samples were analyzed using flow cytometry to assess motility, viability, ROS production, lipid peroxidation, the acrosome reaction, and plasma membrane stability.Results: The density gradient method significantly increased total motility (70.75% ± 12.87%) compared with both the raw semen (55.63% ± 8.55%) and the washing technique (53.13% ± 4.61%). Additionally, the percentage of live spermatozoa was higher in the density gradient group (71.63% ± 13.72%) than in the washed group (54.50% ± 9.53%). There was no significant difference in ROS production between the techniques; however, the density gradient technique reduced the number of ROS-producing dead cells (0.04% ± 0.06%) compared with the washing technique (0.13% ± 0.23%). There was an increase in the number of cells with a reacted acrosome after density gradient centrifugation (25.79% ± 15.07%) compared with raw semen (8.80% ± 4.28%).Conclusion: Density gradient centrifugation is superior to the washing technique in selecting viable and motile sperm: It significantly improved total motility and viability. Although the density gradient technique did not increase oxidative stress, it was associated with a higher incidence of the acrosome reaction, which may have implications for fertility outcomes.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ana Paula de Souza Kussler, Ivan Cunha Bustamante Filho, Elisa Negri, Edison Capp, Helena von Eye Corleta

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).