Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy

Authors

  • Themis Zelmanovitz
  • Jorge L. Gross
  • Jarbas Oliveira
  • Mirela J. de Azevedo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22491/2357-9730.124652

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of urinary total protein measurements in
timed 24-h urine collection and in a diurnal random urine specimen for the screening
and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 167 diabetic patients (20 type 1 and 147 type
2 diabetic patients; 78 women and 89 men), aged 20-84 years, collected 217 timed
24-h urine specimens. Albumin was measured by immunoturbidimetry, total protein
by the sulfosalicylic acid technique, and creatinine by Jaffé’s method. According to
the timed 24-h urinary albumin excretion rate, samples were divided into three groups:
normoalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate < 20 mg/min; n = 84),
microalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate 20-200 mg/min; n = 78), and
macroalbuminuric (urinary albumin excretion rate > 200 mg/min; n = 55). Eight-six
patients also collected 105 random urine specimens (normoalbuminuric, n = 47;
microalbuminuric, n = 37; macroalbuminuric, n = 21), and urinary protein concentration
and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio were measured. The receiver operating
characteristics curve approach was used to analyze the performance of the diagnostic
tests.
RESULTS: Spearman’s coefficient of correlation of 24-h urinary albumin excretion
rate versus 24-h urinary protein was 0.95 ( P < 0.001), and of 24-h urinary albumin
excretion rate versus urinary protein concentration and urinary protein-to-creatinine
ratio were 0.77 and 0.72, respectively (P < 0.001). The calculated areas (±SEM)
under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the diagnosis of overt diabetic
nephropathy were 0.9987 ± 0.001 for 24-h urinary protein, 0.9926 ± 0.006 for urinary
protein concentration, and 0.9751 ± 0.014 for urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio. In
the receiver operating characteristics curves, the first points with 100% sensivity
were 541 mg (95.7% specificity) for 24-h urinary protein, 431 mg/l (92.9% specificity)
for urinary protein concentration, and 0.2 (76.2% specificity) for urinary protein-tocreatinine ratio.
CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of proteinuria presented almost perfect accuracy
for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy. Protein measurement
in spot urine is a reliable and simple method for the screening and diagnosis of overt
diabetic nephropathy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2022-05-25

How to Cite

1.
Zelmanovitz T, L. Gross J, Oliveira J, J. de Azevedo M. Proteinuria is still useful for the screening and diagnosis of overt diabetic nephropathy. Clin Biomed Res [Internet]. 2022 May 25 [cited 2026 Aug. 22];18(2). Available from: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/124652

Issue

Section

Editorial