Anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic (APEC) restructuring plan for improving the quality of surgical patient flow

Autores

  • Carolina Alboim Serviço de Anestesia e Medicina Perioperatoria (SAMPE), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brasil
  • Alice Becker Teixeira Serviço de Anestesia e Medicina Perioperatoria (SAMPE), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Porto Alegre, Brasil.
  • Luciana Eltz Soares Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brasil.
  • Vanda Regina Machado Coordenadoria Administrativa, Serviço de Atenção Cirúrgica, Serviço de Anestesia e Medicina Perioperatória (SAMPE), Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brasil
  • Luciana Cadore Stefani Programa de Pós-Graduaçăo em Medicina: Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil. Departamento de Cirurgia; Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil

Palavras-chave:

Preanesthesia evaluation, preoperative evaluation, preoperative stratification, risk stratification

Resumo

 

Introduction: Anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinics (APECs) are useful for high-risk surgical patient care, as they improve perioperative outcomes and optimize patient care flow. At Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, APEC assesses 20% of all patients undergoing surgery, showing the importance of implementing strategies to improve outpatient clinic efficiency by prioritizing high-risk patients.

 

Methods: Using a specific quality management tool for process improvement (PDCA, which stands for Plan/Do/Check/Act), new protocols were developed for patient referral and preoperative evaluation. Clinical staff was trained in the new routines, and an electronic screening system for patient referral was adopted. Data on patient profiles, referring surgical specialties, type of surgery, and waiting times for appointment and surgical procedure were compared before and after the intervention.

 

Results: APEC performed 1,286 appointments between 2013 and 2016, including 733 pre-intervention and 553 post-intervention. There was a significant decrease in the appointments for patients undergoing minor surgery and an increase in the appointments for those undergoing major surgery.  The waiting time between referral to APEC and first APEC appointment reduced from 46 to 16 days. In addition, there was an increase in vascular, orthopedic, and urology referrals, as well as a reduction in ophthalmology and general surgery referrals. 

 

Conclusion: The PDCA method assisted with conceiving, executing, and monitoring the implemented strategies for changing the profile of patients evaluated at APEC.  The major challenge is to measure the long-term impact of this intervention and expand care through specific strategies for surgical specialties and procedures.

 

KEYWORDS: Preanesthesia evaluation; preoperative evaluation; preoperative stratification; risk stratification

 

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2018-11-01

Como Citar

1.
Alboim C, Teixeira AB, Soares LE, Machado VR, Stefani LC. Anesthesia preoperative evaluation clinic (APEC) restructuring plan for improving the quality of surgical patient flow. Clin Biomed Res [Internet]. 1º de novembro de 2018 [citado 10º de agosto de 2022];38(3). Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/82912

Edição

Seção

Artigos Originais