Are there regional variations in the presentation of childhood leukemia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22491/2357-9730.108722Keywords:
childhood ALL, risk factors, immunophenotyping, minimal residual disease.Abstract
Introduction: Treatment of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is based
on risk stratification. This study aimed to assess the agreement between risk group
classifications in the different childhood ALL treatment protocols used in a referral
hospital in southern Brazil.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged 1 to
18 years with B-cell ALL treated at a hospital from January 2013 to April 2017. Agreement
between risk classifications was assessed by the kappa coefficient.
Results: Seventy-five patients were analyzed. There was poor agreement between
risk stratification by GBTLI 2009 and BFM 95 protocols (kappa=0.22; p = 0.003) and
by GBTLI 2009 and IC-BFM 2002 protocols (kappa=0.24; p = 0.002). Risk group
distribution was 13.3% for low risk, 32.0% for intermediate risk, and 54.7% for high
risk based on stratification by the GBTLI 2009 protocol, and 28.0% for low risk, 42.7%
for intermediate risk, and 29.3% for high risk based on stratification by the IC-BFM
2002 protocol. Overall survival was 68.6%.
Conclusion: This study provides numerous points to ponder about the treatment
of leukemia in Brazil. The percentage of patients classified as high risk in our
sample was higher than that reported in the international literature. This difference,
however, had no impact on overall survival, which was shorter than that reported
in the international literature.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).