Scholarly communication flow: a review of the propositions in the literature in Information Studies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19132/1808-5245272.138-163Keywords:
Scientific communication. Scientific production. Scholarly communication flow. Model of Garvey and Griffith. Unisist.Abstract
This review article reports propositions of models to the scholarly communication flow found in the ABCDM, BRAPCI and LISA databases, in the later 50-year literature, in order to describe, analyze, compare and systematize the findings, using bibliographic research as methodology. This study has identified 27 models, considering features as its evolution, usage in the scientific communication (general or specific to some academic subjects or areas of knowledge) and the geographical coverage of the studies that conceived it. The results consist of a wide comparative analysis of the models found, where is presented each one and are described their main features, sceneries or applications to which they were designed as well as their limitations. It also studied the influence of older models on their successors and modernized ones. These models were classified in groups named synchronous, to those that represent a sequence in the communications along the flow, or asynchronous, to those that do not consider the sequence of disseminations. It is notable the predominance of synchronous models, highlighting the importance that their authors gave to the ability of sequencing communications and even quantify time intervals existing in the flow chronologyDownloads
References
BEER, S. Diagnosing the System for Organization. Chichester: Wiley, 1985.
BJORK, B. C. A model of scientific communication as a global distributed information system. Information Research: an international electronic journal, Borås, v. 12, n. 2, 2007.
BUCK, A. M. et. al., Scholar’s Forum: A New Model for Scholarly Communication. Pasadena, 1999. Disponível em:
https://authors.library.caltech.edu/25880/2/scholarsforum.pdf. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2020.
CHRISTENSEN, H. D. The framing of scientific domains: About UNISIST, domain analysis and art history. Journal of Documentation, Bingley, v. 70, n. 2, p. 261-281, 2014.
COSTA, S. M. S. Mudanças no Processo de Comunicação Científica: O Impacto do uso de Novas Tecnologias. In: MUELLER, S. P. M.; PASSOS, E. J. L. (Orgs.). Comunicação Científica, Brasília: Departamento de Ciência da Informação, Universidade de Brasília, 2000, p. 95-105.
CORREIA, A. E. G. C. O fluxo da informação no processo de pesquisa na UFPE: as influências das tecnologias da informação e comunicação. 2006. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência da Informação) – Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência da Informação, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, 2006.
FERNANDES, H. D. H.; VILAN FILHO, J. L. Fluxo da Informação Científica: uma análise dos estudos e modelos. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 20., 2019, Florianópolis. Anais [...] Florianópolis: Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, 2019.
FESTINGER, L. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1957.
GARVEY, W. D.; GRIFFITH, B. C. Communication and information processing within scientific disciplines: Empirical findings for Psychology. Information Storage and Retrieval, Elmsford, v. 8, n. 3, p. 123-136, 1972.
GOMES, C. M. Comunicação Científica: alicerces, transformações e tendências. Covilhã: Livros Labcom, 2013.
HURD, J. M. Models of Scientific Communications Systems. In: CROWFORD, S. Y.; HURD, J. M.; WELLER, A. C. (Orgs.). From Print to Electronic: the transformation of scientific communication. Medford: ASIS, 1996. p. 9-33.
HURD. J. M. The Transformation of Scientific Communication: a model for 2020. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, New York, v. 51, n. 14, p.1279-1283, 2000.
KHOSROWJERDI, M.; ALIDOUSTI, S. Scientific information transfer: A conceptual model for scientific communication in IranDoc. The Electronic Library, Bingley, v. 28, n. 6, p. 818-828, 2010.
KHOSROWJERDI, M. Designing a viable scientific communication model: VSM approach. Library Hi Tech, Bradford, v. 29, n. 2, p. 359-372, 2011.
LANCASTER, F. W. Acessibilidade da informação na pesquisa científica em processo. Ciência da Informação, Rio de Janeiro, v. 4, n. 2, p. 109-117, 1975.
LIEVROUW, L. A. Communication, representation, and scientific knowledge: a conceptual framework and case study. Knowledge and Policy, New Brunswick, v. 5, n. 1, p. 6-28, 1992.
MEADOWS, A. J. A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos/Livros, 1999.
MELO, B. K. S. B. Fluxo da comunicação científica na área de Ciência da Informação no Brasil: análise da produção científica relacionada com teses defendidas de 2008 a 2010. 2014. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Biblioteconomia) – Universidade de Brasília, Brasília, 2014.
MUELLER, S. P. M. A ciência, o sistema de comunicação científica e a literatura científica. In: CAMPELLO, B. S.; CENDÓN, B. V.; KREMER, J. M. (Orgs.). Fontes de Informação para Pesquisadores e Profissionais, Belo Horizonte: Ed. UFMG, 2000. p. 21-34.
NIST - National Institute of Standards and Technology. Integration definition for function modeling (IDEF0). Draft federal information processing standards publication 183, Gaithersburg: National Institute for Standards and Technology, 1993.
PINTO, C. S.; COSTA, J. L. Padrões de comunicação em diferentes comunidades científicas. In: COSTA, S. M. S.; LEITE, F. C. L.; TAVARES, R. B. (Orgs.). Comunicação da informação, gestão da informação e gestão do conhecimento. Brasília: Ibict, 2018. p. 145-159.
SHEARER, K.; BIRDSALL, B. The transition of scholarly communications in Canada. Canada, 2002. Disponível em:
https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/The-Transition-of-Scholarly-Communications-in-the-Shearer-Birdsall/ebca8f87ea2a28a6e289ce94e5a67055ec7d02ba. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2020.
SHEHATA, A. et al. The impact of information and communication technologies on informal scientific communication. Library Review, Bradford, v. 64, n. 6, p. 428-445, 2015.
SØNDERGAARD, T. F. et al. Documents and the communication of scientific and scholarly information: Revising and updating the UNISIST model. Journal of Documentation, London, v. 59, n. 3, p. 278-320, 2003.
UNESCO - United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Unisist: Study Report on the Feasibility of a World Science Information System. Paris: Unesco, 1971.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Henrique Denes Hilgenberg Fernandes, Jayme Leiro Vilan Filho
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors will keep their copyright and grant the journal with the right of first publication, the work licensed under License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), which allows for the sharing of work and the recognition of authorship.
Authors can take on additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal, such as publishing in an institutional repository, acknowledging its initial publication in this journal.
The articles are open access and free. In accordance with the license, you must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
