The establishment of soy moratorium in Brazilian Amazon rainforest
Strategic environmental action to exploit opportunities in multiple fields
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.1590/18070337-128528ptKeywords:
soy moratorium, Amazon Rainforest, strategic action fields, social movements, political opportunitiesAbstract
The paper addresses how environmental movement organizations were able to establish the soy moratorium in the Brazilian Amazon. It combines the Strategic Action Field (SAFs) perspective with ideas of social movements theory, addressing markets as cultural, political and historical constructions. Qualitative research was conducted using data from multiple sources. Debating with authors who conceptualized the political opportunity structures (POS) of markets, we demonstrate that these may be better understood as an ensemble of interconnected SAFs. In order to deal with closed POS in the Amazon, environmental organizations had to strategically shift the scale and internationalize their protests, identifying and taking advantage of openings in European sectors and companies and pressuring them into using their force to transform the practices of major soy traders.
Downloads
References
ALONSO, Angela; COSTA, Valeriano; MACIEL, Débora. Identidade e estratégia na formação do movimento ambientalista brasileiro. Novos estudos CEBRAP, n. 79, p. 151-167, 2007.
ANDRADE, Roberta A.; SACOMANO NETO, Mário; CANDIDO, Silvio E. A. Implementing community-based forest management in the Brazilian Amazon Rainforest: a strategic action fields perspective. Environmental Politics, v. 31, n. 3, p. 519-541, 2002.
BARBOSA, Luiz C. Guardians of the brazilian amazon rainforest: environmental organizations and development. Londres: Routledge, 2015.
BARTLEY, Tim; EGELS-ZANDÉN, Niklas. Beyond decoupling: Unions and the leveraging of corporate social responsibility in Indonesia. Socio-Economic Review, v. 14, n. 2, p. 231-255, 2016.
BECKER, Bertha. K. Revisão das políticas de ocupação da Amazônia: é possível identificar modelos para projetar cenários? Parcerias estratégicas, v. 6, n. 12, p. 135-159, 2001.
CANDIDO, Silvio Eduardo A.; SACOMANO NETO, Mario; CÔRTES, Mauro R. How social inequalities shape markets: lessons from the configuration of PET recycling practices in Brazil. Business & Society, v. 61, n. 3, p. 539-571, 2022.
CARDOSO, Fátima C. (2008). Do confronto à governança ambiental: uma perspectiva institucional para a Moratória da Soja na Amazônia. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência Ambiental) – Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, 2008.
CARNEIRO, Marcelo. S. A construção social do mercado de madeiras certificadas na Amazônia brasileira: a atuação das ONGs ambientalistas e das empresas pioneiras. Sociedade e Estado, v. 22, p. 681-713, 2007.
DIMAGGIO, Paul. J.; POWELL, Walter. W. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, v. 48, n. 2, p. 147-160, 1983.
FLIGSTEIN, Neil. Understanding stability and change in fields. Research in Organizational Behavior, v. 33, 39-51, 2013.
FLIGSTEIN, Neil. The architecture of markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001.
FLIGSTEIN, Neil.; MCADAM, Doug. A theory of fields. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
GIBBS, Holly et al. Brazil’s soy moratorium. Science, v. 347, n. 6220, p. 377-378, 2015.
GREENPEACE. Comendo a Amazônia. Brasil: Greenpeace, 2006.
GTS – GRUPO DE TRABALHO DA SOJA. Relatório da moratória da soja no bioma Amazônia. Brasil: GTS, 2007.
HOCHSTETLER, Kathryn; KECK, Margaret E. Greening Brazil: Environmental activism in state and society. Durham: Duke University Press, 2007.
HUSU, Hanna-Mari. Rethinking incumbency: Utilising Bourdieu’s field, capital, and habitus to explain energy transitions. Energy Research and Social Science, v. 93, e102825, 2022.
KECK, Margaret E.; SIKKINK, Kathryn. Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics. International social science journal, v. 51, n. 159, p. 89-101, 1999.
KING, Brayden G.; PEARCE, Nicolas. A. The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements, and institutional change in markets. Annual review of sociology, v. 36, p. 249-267, 2010.
KNEEN, Brewster. Invisible giant: Cargill and its transnational strategies. Londres: Pluto Press, 2002.
KUNGL, Gregor; HESS, David J. Sustainability transitions and strategic action fields: A literature review and discussion. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, v. 38, p. 22-33, 2021.
LAMBIN, Eric et al. The role of supply-chain initiatives in reducing deforestation. Nature Climate Change, v. 8, n. 2, p. 109-116, 2018.
LANGERT, Bob. The battle to do good: Inside McDonald’s sustainability journey. Bingley: Emerald, 2019.
LEROY, Jean-Pierre. Uma chama na Amazônia. Rio de Janeiro: Vozes, 1991.
MARTIN, John-Levi. What is field theory? American journal of sociology, v. 109, n. 1, p. 1-49, 2003.
MCADAM, Doug; TARROW, Sidney; TILLY, Charles. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003.
MCATEER, Emily; PULVER, Simone. The corporate boomerang: Shareholder transnational advocacy networks targeting oil companies in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Global Environmental Politics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 1-30, 2009.
MEYER, David. Protest and political opportunities. Annual review of sociology, v. 30, p. 125-145, 2004.
NEPSTAD, Daniel et al. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science, v. 344, n. 6188, p. 1118-1123, 2014.
POLANYI, Karl. A grande transformação. Lisboa: Leya, 2013.
POLKINGHORNE, Donald. E. Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. International journal of qualitative studies in education, v. 8, n. 1, p. 5-23, 1995.
SCHURMAN, Rachel. Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Social problems, v. 51, n. 2, p. 243-268, 2004.
SOULE, Sarah. Contention and corporate social responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.
STEWARD, Corrina. From colonization to “environmental soy”: a case study of environmental and socio-economic valuation in the Amazon soy frontier. Agriculture and Human Values, v. 24, n. 1, p. 107-122, 2007.
TARROW, Sidney. The new transnational activism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.
TEMPER, Leah. From boomerangs to minefields and catapults: dynamics of trans-local resistance to land-grabs. The Journal of Peasant Studies, v. 46, n. 1, p. 188-216, 2019.
TORRES, Maurício; BRANFORD, Sue. Após mais de uma década, pacto voluntário entre empresas e ONGs deixa dúvidas sobre eficácia em proteger a Amazônia. The Intercept, 16 mar. 2017. Disponível em: https://theintercept.com/2017/03/16/moratoria-da-soja-solucao-contra-o-desmatamento-ou-marketing-corporativo/
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Silvio Eduardo Alvarez Candido
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which allows the sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.