The social as intersubjectivity

George Herbert Mead and the sociology of individual multitudes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/18070337-126344

Keywords:

George Herbert Mead, intersubjectivity, pragmatism, self, Chicago School

Abstract

This review critically appraises the newest edition of George Herbert Mead’s classic Mind, Self, and Society, edited by Hans Joas and Daniel Huebner and recently translated to Portuguese and published in Brazil. The analysis of its main ideas contextualizes the social psychology the book systematizes in Mead’s thought and in the conceptual universe of pragmatism, with special reference to the influence Mead received from James and Dewey. This is followed by a discussion on the editorial problems surrounding the volume and its original editor, Charles W. Morris, and reference is made to the contemporary debate on the book’s legitimacy within Mead’s body of work. It is concluded that this newest edition contributes for the adoption of an approach more aligned to Mead’s theoretical standpoint in order to reflect on his own production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Fabrício Cardoso de Mello, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Doutor em Sociologia e membro do  Núcleo de Teoria Social e América Latina (NETSAL), do IESP/UERJ e do Núcleo de Estudos Urbanos e Socioambientais (NEUS) ligado ao PPGSP/UVV.

References

COOK, Gary A. George Herbert Mead: The making of a social pragmatist. Urbana: University of Illinois Press,1993.

COOK, Gary A. Resolving two key problems in Mead’s Mind, Self, and Society. In: BURKE, F. T.; SKOWRONSKI, K. P. (org.). George Herbert Mead in the Twenty-First Century. Lanham: Lexington Books, 2013. p. 95-105.

DEWEY, John. The reflex arc concept in psychology. The Psychological Review, v. III, n. 4, p. 357-370, 1896.

DEWEY, John; HOOK, Sidney; NAGEL, Ernest. Are naturalists materialists? The Journal of Philosophy, v. 42, n. 19, p. 515-530, 1945.

FINE, Gary Alan; KLEINMAN, Sherryl. Interpreting the sociological classics: Can there be a “true” meaning of Mead? Symbolic Interaction, v. 9, n. 1, p.129-146, 1986.

HUEBNER, Daniel R. Becoming Mead: The social process of academic knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 2014.

JOAS, Hans. G.H. Mead: A contemporary re-examination of his thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1985.

MARKELL, Patchen. The potential and the actual: Mead, Honneth, and the “I”. In: VAN DEN BRINK, B.; OWEN, D. (org.) Recognition and power: Axel Honneth and the tradition of critical social theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. p. 100-132.

MEAD, George Herbert. Mente, self e sociedade: Edição definitiva. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2020.

MEAD, George Herbert. The philosophy of the act. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1972/1938.

MEAD, George Herbert. Mind, self & society: From the standpoint of a social behaviorist. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1967/1934.

MEAD, George Herbert. The philosophy of the Present. Londres: Open Court, 1932.

MEAD, George Herbert. A behavioristic account of the significant symbol. The Journal of Philosophy, v.19, n. 6, p. 157-163, 1922.

MEAD, George Herbert. The social self. The Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods, v. 10, n. 14, p. 374-380, 1913.

MELLO, Fabrício C. de. On the material supports of subjectivity: Mead, the self and the new mastery of nature. Social Science Information, v. 61, n. 2-3, p. 245-270, 2022.

SILVA, Filipe C. da; VIEIRA, Mónica B. Books and canon building in sociology: The case of Mind, Self, and Society. Journal of Classical Sociology, v. 11, n. 4, p. 356-377, 2011.

Published

2023-10-05

How to Cite

CARDOSO DE MELLO, Fabrício. The social as intersubjectivity: George Herbert Mead and the sociology of individual multitudes. Sociologias, [S. l.], v. 25, n. 62, 2023. DOI: 10.1590/18070337-126344. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/126344. Acesso em: 9 aug. 2026.

Issue

Section

Reviews