From a distance

elements for a sociology of contact in the context of a pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.1590/18070337-112451

Keywords:

touch, love, body, sinister, social distancing, pandemic

Abstract

We explore, throughout the paper, the reconfiguration of social relations under the imposition of physical distancing in the context of the Covid-19 pandemic. Specifically, we analyze the loss of the haptic dimension of socio-erotic relationships and the socio-cultural transformation that this entails. Based on a fieldwork at a distance, we explore how our own body and the one of those with whom we are emotionally and socially tied have become sinister, that is, familiar and strange at the same time. Finally, we argue that the momentary suspension of the historical and cultural common ground of socio-affective relationships has allowed to identify the conditions of their possibility of them, revealing them not only as intersubjective but also defined by other agents that determine the ecology of these relationships.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Daniel Castaño Zapata, Universidad de Medellín

Doctor en Ciencias Sociales. Profesor en la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas y coordinador de la Maestría en Conflicto y Paz de la Universidad de Medellín.

Gabriel Ruiz Romero, Universidad de Medellín

Doctor en Antropología Social y Profesor en la Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanas de la Universidad de Medellín.

References

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. “Aclaraciones”. Comunizar, 2020. Disponible en: http://comunizar.com.ar/giorgio-agamben-aclaraciones/

BAU, Andrea. Elogio de la mano: el tacto, la mano y la piel en el discurso médico de la primera modernidad. Ingenium, v. 12, p. 101-126, 2018.

BAUDRILLARD, Jean. Cultura y simulacro. Barcelona: Kairós, 1978.

BAUMAN, Zygmunt. Amor líquido. México: FCE, 2005.

BRYANT, Levi. A world is ending. Lockdown Theory #12. Identities, 3 abr. 2020. Disponible en: https://identitiesjournal.edu.mk/index.php/IJPGC/announcement/view/21

CLASSEN, Cosntance. The deepest sense: a cultural history of touch. Urbane: University of Illinois Press, 2012.

CENTROS PARA EL CONTROL Y LA PREVENCIÓN DE ENFERMEDADES – CDC. Distanciamiento social, 17 nov. 2020. Disponible en: https://espanol.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/social-distancing.html

CROSSLEY, Nick. Body techniques, agency and intercorporeality: on Goffman’s relations in public. Sociology, v. 29, n. 1, p. 133-149, 1995.

DELANDA, Manuel. A new philosophy of society. Londres: Continuum, 2006.

DUNBAR, Robin. The social role of touch in humans and primates: behavioural function and neurobiological mechanisms. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, v. 34, n. 2, p. 260-268, 2010.

ENFIELD, Nick. Relationship thinking and human pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics, v. 41, p. 60-78, 2009.

ESTAMOS, estarás. Intérpretes: Gabo Ferro y Luciana Jury. Compositor: Gabo Ferro. In: EL VENENO de los milagros. Intérpretes: Gabo Ferro y Luciana Jury. Argentina: Oui Oui Records, 2014. Mp3. Faixa 2.

FREUD, Sigmund. Obras completas. Madrid: Biblioteca Nueva, 1968. Vol. 7.

FREUD, Sigmund. Obras completas. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu, 1986. Vol. 21.

FULKERSON, Matthew. Touch without touching. Philosophers’ Imprint, v. 12, n. 5, p. 1-15, 2012.

GARCÍA ANDRADE, Adriana. El amor como problema sociológico. Acta sociológica, v. 66, p. 35-60, 2014.

GARFINKEL, Harold. Studies of the routine grounds of everyday activities. Social Problems, v. 11, n. 3, p. 225-250, 1964.

GOFFMAN, Erving. Interaction ritual: essays in face-to-face behavior. Chicago: Aldine Publishing Company, 1967.

HAKKEN, David. Cyborgs@Cyberspace. An ethnographer looks to the future. Nueva York: Routledge, 1999.

HARAWAY, Donna. Ciencia, cyborgs y mujeres: La reinvención de la naturaleza. Madrid: Cátedra, 1991.

HIGHMORE, Ben. Formations of feelings, constellations of things. Cultural Studies Review, v. 22, n. 1, p. 144-167, 2016.

HORNBORG, Alf. Relationism as revelation or prescription? Some thoughts on how Ingold’s implicit critique of modernity could be harnessed to political ecology. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, v. 43, n. 3-4, p. 253-263, 2018.

HOWES, Davis. El creciente campo de los estudios sensoriales. Revista Latinoamericana de Estudios sobre Cuerpos, Emociones y Sociedad, v. 15, p. 10-26, 2014.

ILLOUZ, Eva. Por qué duele el amor. Buenos Aires: Katz, 2012.

INGOLD, Tim. Worlds of sense and sensing the world. Social Anthropology/Anthropologie Sociale, v. 19, n. 3, p. 313-317, 2011.

INGOLD, Tim. A evolução da sociedade. In: FABIAN, Andrew (ed.). Evolução: sociedade, ciencia e universe. Bauru: Edusc, 2003. pp. 107-131.

INGOLD, Tim. The perception of environment: essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. Londres: Routledge, 2000.

INGOLD, Tim. Becoming persons: consciousness and sociality in human evolution. Cultural Dynamics, Londres, v. 4, n. 3, p. 355-378, 1991.

JEWITT, Carey; MACKLEY, Kerstin. Methodological dialogues across multimodality and sensory ethnography: digital touch communication. Qualitative Research, v. 19, n. 1, p. 90-110, 2018.

KATILA, Julia; GAN, Yumei; GOODWIN, Marjorie. Interaction rituals and ‘social distancing’: New haptic trajectories and touching from a distance in the time of COVID-19. Discourse Studies, Londres, v. 22, n. 4, p. 418-440, 2020.

KAUFMANN, Jean Claude. L’étrange histoire de l’amour heureux. París: Pluriel, 2010.

KOLNAI, Aurel. On disgust. Chicago: Open Court, 2004.

LE BRETON, David. El sabor del mundo. Una antropología de los sentidos. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, 2009.

LE BRETON, David. La sociología del cuerpo. Buenos Aires: Nueva Visión, 2002.

MARION, Jean-Luc. El fenómeno erótico. Buenos Aires: Cuenco de Plata, 2005.

MENNINGHAUS, Winfried. Disgust, the theory and history of a strong sensation. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.

MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. Fenomenología de la percepción. España: Planeta-De Agostini, 1993.

ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE LA SALUD – OMS. Declaración sobre la segunda reunión del Comité de Emergencias del Reglamento Sanitario ‎Internacional (2005) acerca del brote del nuevo coronavirus (2019-nCoV). WHO.int, 30 ene. 2020a. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/es/news/item/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)

ORGANIZACIÓN MUNDIAL DE LA SALUD – OMS. Coronavirus Press Conference. WHO.int, 20 mar. 2020. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/transcripts/who-audio-emergencies-coronavirus-press-conference-full-20mar2020.pdf?sfvrsn=1eafbff_0

RICOEUR, Paul. Tiempo y narración III. El tiempo narrado. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI, 2009.

RIMBAUD, Arthur. Una temporada en el infierno. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2012.

ROBBEN, Antonius. Un trabajo de campo desde la distancia: las paradojas de una antropología de la guerra al terror. In: BULLEN, Margaret; DÍEZ, María (eds.). Retos teóricos y nuevas prácticas. Donostia: Ankulegi Antropologia Elkartea, 2008. pp. 55-87.

ROMANIA, Vincenzo. Interactional anomie? Imaging social distance after COVID-19: a Goffmanian perspective. Sociologica, v. 14, n. 1, p. 51-66, 2020.

SCHELLING, Friedrich. Filosofía del arte. Madrid: Tecnos, 2006.

SIMMEL, Georg. Sociología. México: FCE, 2014.

STENDHAL. Del amor. Madrid: Alianza, 2011.

TAHHAN, Diana. Touching at depth: the potential of feeling and connection. Emotion, Space and Society, Amsterdam, v. 7, p. 45-53, may. 2013.

TAYLOR, Charles. 1993. Engaged agency and background in Heidegger. In: GUIGNON, Charles (ed.). The Cambridge Companion to Heidegger. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993. p. 317-336.

THE GREAT BARRINGTON DECLARATION. Great Barrington Declaration, 2020. Disponible en: https://gbdeclaration.org/

VOLVER A ABRAZARSE, pero entre plásticos. El Tiempo, 18 jun. 2020. Disponible en: https://www.eltiempo.com/cultura/gente/coronavirus-en-espana-residencia-de-ancianos-permite-abrazos-con-plastico-508278

WEITMAN, Sasha. On the elementary forms of the socioerotic life. Theory, Culture & Society, v. 15, n. 3-4, p. 71-110, 1998.

ZULAIKA, Joseba. 2008. Etnografía del deseo. In: BULLEN, Margaret; DÍEZ, María (eds.). Retos teóricos y nuevas prácticas. Donostia: Ankulegi Antropologia Elkartea, 2008. pp. 241-278.

Published

2022-08-29

How to Cite

CASTAÑO ZAPATA, Daniel; RUIZ ROMERO, Gabriel. From a distance: elements for a sociology of contact in the context of a pandemic. Sociologias, [S. l.], v. 24, n. 60, 2022. DOI: 10.1590/18070337-112451. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/sociologias/article/view/112451. Acesso em: 1 sep. 2026.