QUALIFICATION OF THE FEEDBACK TOOL IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS

EXPERIENCE REPORT IN MULTI-PROFESSIONAL AND UNI-PROFESSIONAL RESIDENCY PROGRAMS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54909/sp.v8i1.136417

Keywords:

Planning, Formative Feedback, Preceptorship, Internship, Nonmedical

Abstract

Introduction: Educational planning actions prove to be fundamental for pedagogical practice, guiding the educator's work so that it is a continuous process of critical-reflective action. Objective: To report the experience of an educational action on the use of feedback in the training process of two residency programs (multi and uniprofessional) at a philanthropic hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil. Experience report: Six face-to-face meetings were organized by the programs' preceptors to develop the educational action, in which 117 preceptors from the Multiprofessional Residency in Neonatology and Residency in Obstetric Nursing programs participated. The pedagogical action was preceded by planning, based on a need previously indicated in the daily practice by the preceptors. The use of the feedback tool in the evaluation process of the resident professional was addressed, considering its components – timeliness, specificity, assertiveness – and the communication skills required in the educational process, followed by simulations of inadequate and effective feedback. Conclusion: Planning the educational practice made it possible to achieve the learning objectives of the educational activity carried out. It is recommended to invest in the planning of continuing education actions aimed at preceptorship, designed based on the needs experienced by professional preceptors in the daily life of health residency programs, in order to support them in the evaluation process and encourage their participation in activities health teaching-learning-evaluation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Camilla Lorraine Moreira Dias, Hospital Sofia Feldman

Mestre em Saúde e Enfermagem pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Enfermeira do Hospital Sofia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

Erika da Silva Dittz, Hospital Sofia Feldman

Doutorado em Ciências da Saúde pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Terapeuta Ocupacional do Hospital Sofia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

Fernanda Natielle Araújo Veiga, Hospital Sofia Feldman

Mestranda em Ciências Fonoaudiológicas pela Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Fonoaudióloga do Hospital Sofia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

Luana Fátima Alvarenga Silveira, Hospital Sofia Feldman

Especialista em Enfermagem Obstétrica pelo Hospital Sofia Feldman. Enfermeira Obstetra do Hospital Sofia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

Raquel Vieira do Amaral, Hospital Sofia Feldman

Especialista em Fisioterapia Neonatal pela Universidade Estácio de Sá/Hospital Sofia Feldman. Fisioterapeuta do Hospital Sofia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

Raiane Teixeira Xavier, Hospital Sofia Feldman

Especialista em Enfermagem Obstétrica pelo Hospital Sofia Feldman. Enfermeira Obstetra do Hospital Sofia Feldman, Belo Horizonte, Brasil

Published

2024-02-07

How to Cite

DIAS, Camilla Lorraine Moreira; DITTZ, Erika da Silva; VEIGA, Fernanda Natielle Araújo; SILVEIRA, Luana Fátima Alvarenga; AMARAL, Raquel Vieira do; XAVIER, Raiane Teixeira. QUALIFICATION OF THE FEEDBACK TOOL IN THE EVALUATION PROCESS: EXPERIENCE REPORT IN MULTI-PROFESSIONAL AND UNI-PROFESSIONAL RESIDENCY PROGRAMS. Saberes Plurais, [S. l.], v. 8, n. 1, p. e136417, 2024. DOI: 10.54909/sp.v8i1.136417. Disponível em: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/saberesplurais/article/view/136417. Acesso em: 1 sep. 2026.