Which is the best paradigm to interpret the genres in television programming?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.19132/1807-8583201534.28-45Keywords:
Television. TV genres. Interpretation. Enunciation. Promise. Universes.Abstract
The number of television genres, that is already big, grows more every day. How to define which are the fundamental interpretants that would allow us to think, not only about the genres of the past, but also about those to come? This is the question that I try to answer through a conceptual model that has evolved over the years particularly from a characterization of mode of enunciation, to a characterization of universe. From mode to universe there is a change of paradigm. This article proposes, therefore, an epstemological return to three different ways of seen the television genre. Starting from a promise that guide the viewers’ interpretations and convictions, and that can be identified initially at a semiological level; then pragmatically, as a result of the recognition of a mode of enunciation that defines a TV program’s value of truth; and finally by its definition inside a universe, a model that explains the reason why different genre interpretations constitute a judicial problem, as well as an economical and comunicational issue.Downloads
References
BARTHES, Roland. Mythologies. Paris: Seuil, 1957.
ECO, Umberto, Six promenades dans les bois du roman. Paris: Grasset, 1996.
ECO, Umberto. TV: la transparence perdue. La Guerre du faux. Paris: Livre de poche, [1983] 1991.
GENETTE, Gérard. Fiction et diction. Paris: Seuil. 1991.
HAMBURGER, Käte. Logique des genres littéraires. Paris: Seuil, 1986.
HENRIOT, Jacques. Sous couleurs de jouer: la métaphore ludique. Paris: Corti, 1989.
JOST, François. Un Monde à notre image: énonciation, cinéma, télévision. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck, 1992.
JOST, François. Le Temps d’un regard. Paris-Montréal: Méridiens Klincksieck-Nuit Blanche, 1998a.
JOST, François. Quand y a-t-il énonciation télévisuelle? In: BOURDON, J. ; JOST, F. (Dir.). Penser la télévision: actes du colloque de Cerisy. Paris: Nathan, 1998b.
SCHAEFFER, Jean-Marie. Qu’est-ce qu’une genre littéraire? Paris: Seuil, 1989.
SPERBER, Dan; WILSON, Deirdre. La pertinence: communication et cognition. Paris: Mi-nuit, 1989.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 François Jost

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
The copyright of works published in this journal belong to the authors, and the right of first publication is conceded to the journal. Due to the journal being of open access, the articles are of free use in research, educational and non-commercial activities.
Therefore, the journal uses the License Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC 4.0), which allows sharing of work with acknowledgment of authorship.
Self-archiving (repository policy): authors are allowed to deposit all versions of their work in institutional or thematic repositories without embargo. It is requested, whenever possible, that the full bibliographic reference of the version published in Intexto (including the DOI link) be added to the archived text.
Intexto does not charge any article processing fees (article processing charge).