Poor nutritional status of fifteen-year-old or younger adolescent mothers enhances the risk of small-for-gestational-age newborns

Authors

  • Maria Francisca Alves Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Médicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil. Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém do Pará - PA, Brasil.
  • Helena von Eye Corleta Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina, UFRGS Serviço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, HCPA http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7406-737X
  • Edison Capp Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina, UFRGS Serviço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, HCPA http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1039-7940
  • Jaqueline Neves Lubianca Departamento de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, Faculdade de Medicina, UFRGS Serviço de Ginecologia e Obstetrícia, HCPA http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4151-2523

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22491/2357-9730.122432

Keywords:

small for gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction, low birthweight, teenage pregnancy, nutritional status

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the factors associated with the birth of small for gestational age newborns. Methods: A cross-sectional study was performed with 15 years old or younger postpartum adolescents divided into small-for-gestational-age newborn (SGA) and non-small-for-gestational age newborn groups (NSGA). Socio-demographic, clinical, prenatal care, delivery, postpartum data and anthropometric measures were collected. Results: 8,153 women gave birth at the obstetric ward and 364 (4.46%) ≤ 15 years old adolescents were enrolled in the study. The proportion of SGA newborns was 34.61%. The SGA group attended fewer prenatal visits (p = 0.037), had a higher prevalence of nutritional status classified as "very low weight" (p <0.001) and vaginal delivery (p = 0.023), significantly different from the NSGA group. The nutritional status and vaginal delivery remained significant even after adjustment for confounders. The prevalence risk for SGA birth was 30% higher in the group of mothers with nutritional status classified as "very low weight” by Frisancho (odds ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 1.13 to 1.50) (p <0.001). Conclusions: The birth of SGA among adolescents ≤ 15 years of age is independently associated with maternal nutritional status classified as "very low weight" by the mid-arm circumference measures (MAC).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2023-05-29

How to Cite

1.
Alves MF, Corleta H von E, Capp E, Lubianca JN. Poor nutritional status of fifteen-year-old or younger adolescent mothers enhances the risk of small-for-gestational-age newborns. Clin Biomed Res [Internet]. 2023 May 29 [cited 2026 Aug. 3];43(1). Available from: https://seer.ufrgs.br/index.php/hcpa/article/view/122432

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >> 

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.