Analytical method by liquid chromatography to assay piperine associated in nanoemulsions

Authors

  • Mariana Heldt Motta Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria image/svg+xml
  • Aline C. Schneider Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria image/svg+xml
  • Cristiane Franco Codevilla Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia dos Alimentos na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria image/svg+xml
  • Cristiano Menezes Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência e Tecnologia dos Alimentos na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria image/svg+xml
  • Cristiane de Bona da Silva Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Farmacêuticas na Universidade Federal de Santa Maria image/svg+xml

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/2527-2616.80366

Keywords:

Nanocarrier, Piper nigrum, Validation

Abstract

This work aimed to develop and validate a simple, fast and low cost analytical method for the quantification of the bioactive piperine in nanoemulsions by high performance liquid chromatography with UV detection. Nanoemulsions were prepared by spontaneous emulsification and their physicochemical properties were evaluated. Considering the chromatographic conditions, the mobile phase was composed by methanol:water (70:30, v/v), Gemini® C18 column, and UV detection at 343 nm. The method was linear in the concentration range of 5-50 μg mL-1 (r = 0.9999), specific, precise (repeatability of RSD 0.38 % and intermediate precision of RSD 1.11 %), accurate (101.3 %) and robust. Nanoemulsions showed nanometric droplet size, polidispersity index below 0.11 and negative zeta potential. The piperine content in the samples was 0.99 ± 0.01 mg mL-1. Regarding these features, the analytical conditions proposed in this work were adequate and effective to determine the piperine content in nanoemulsions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Meghawal M, Goswami TK; Phytother. Res. 2013, 27, 1121-1130.

Butt MS, Pasha I, Sultan MT, Randhawa MA, Saeed F, Ahmed W. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2013, 53, 37-41.

Polovka M, Suhaj M. Food Rev. Int. 2010, 26, 138-161.

Srinivasan K. Indian Food Ind. 2008, 27, 36-47.

de Souza EL, Stamford TLM, Lima EO, Trajano VN, Barbosa JMJr. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2005, 48, 549-558.

Srinivasan K. Food Rev. Int. 2005, 21, 167-188.

Ferreira WS, Franklin TN, Lopes ND, de Lima MEF. Rev. Virtual Quim. 2012, 4, 208-224.

Thiel A, Buskens C, Woehrle T, Etheve S, Schoenmakers A, Fehr M, Beilstein P. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2014, 66, 350-357.

McNamara FN, Randall A, Gunthorpe MJ. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2005, 144, 781-790.

Charcosset C, El-Harati A, Fessi H. J. Membr. Sci. 2005, 108, 115-120.

Couvreur P, Barrat G, Fattal E, Legrand P, Vauthier C. Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst. 2002, 19, 99-134.

Rawat M, Singh D, Saraf S. Biol. Pharma. Bull. 2006, 29, 1790-1798.

Schaffazick SR, Freitas LL, Pohlmann AR, Guterres SS. Quim. Nova. 2003, 26, 726-737.

Mishra B, Bhavesh PB, Tiwari S. Nanomedicine. 2010, 6, 9-24.

Fontana MC, Coradini K, Guterres SS, Pohlmann AR, Beck RCR. J. Biomed. Nanotechnol. 2009, 5, 254-263.

Ourique AF, Pohlmann AR, Guterres SS, Beck RCR. Int. J. Pharma. 2008, 352, 1-4.

Savian AL, Rodrigues D, Weber J, Ribeiro RF, Motta MH, Schaffazick SR, Adams AIH, Andrade DF, Beck RCR, Silva CB. Mater. Sci. Eng. C. 2015, 46, 69-76.

Moorthi C, Krishnan K, Manavalan R, Kathiresan K. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2012, 2, 841-848.

De Mey E, De Maere H, Dewulf L, Paelinck H, Sajewicz M, Fraeye I, Kowalska T. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2014, 238, 477-484.

Gowda DV, Mugulil G, Jadhav AN, Nagraja P, Sarathchandraprakash, Babu UV, Paramesh R, Deshpande RD. Indo Am. J. Pharm. Res. 2014, 4, 4042-4046.

Su L, Yin JJ, Charles D, Zhow K, Moore J, Yu L. Food Chem. 2007, 100, 990-997.

Kapoor IPS, Singh B, Singh G, DeHeluani CS, De-Lampasona MP, Catalan CAN. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5358-5364.

Selvendiram K, Banu, SM, Sakthisekaram D. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2004, 350, 73-78.

Bouchemal K, Briançon S, Perrier E, Fessi H. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 280, 241.

International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2 (R1), 2005.

Kapoor IPS, Singh B, Singh G, DeHeluani CS, De-Lampasona MP, Catalan CAN. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chem. 2009, 57, 5358-5364.

Selvendiram K, Banu, SM, Sakthisekaram D. Clin. Chim. Acta. 2004, 350, 73-78.

Bouchemal K, Briançon S, Perrier E, Fessi H. Int. J. Pharm. 2004, 280, 241.

International Conference on Harmonization (ICH), Validation of Analytical Procedures: Text and Methodology, Q2 (R1), 2005.

Brazil. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. 2017. Resolução RDC n° 166 de 27 de Julho de 2017. Dispõe sobre a validação de métodos analíticos e dá outras providências, Diário Oficial da União: Brasília.

Härter APG, Motta MH, Barros JG, Ribeiro RF, Adams AIH, Schaffazick SR, Silva CB. Quim. Nova. 2015, 37, 996-999

Lopes CE, Langoski G, Klein T, Ferrari PC, Farago PV. Braz. J. Pharm. Sci. 2017, 53, 1-9.

Salvia-Trujillo L, Sun Q, Um BH, Park Y, McClements DJ. J. Funct. Foods. 2015, 17, 293-304.

Cattani VB, Fiel LA, Jäger A, Jäger E, Colomé LM, Uchoa F, Stefani V, Costa TD, Guterres SS, Pohlmann AR. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2010, 39, 116-124.

Pachauri M, Gupta ED, Ghosh PC. J Drug Deliv. Sci. Technol. 2015, 29, 269- 282.

Boddupalli BM, Masana P, Anisetti RN, Kallem SV, Madipoju B. Drug Inv. Today. 2013, 5, 212-215.

Downloads

Published

14-09-2018 — Updated on 11-03-2026

Versions

How to Cite

Motta, M. H., C. Schneider, A., Codevilla, C. F., Menezes, C., & da Silva, C. de B. (2026). Analytical method by liquid chromatography to assay piperine associated in nanoemulsions . Drug Analytical Research, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.22456/2527-2616.80366 (Original work published September 14, 2018)

Issue

Section

ORIGINAL ARTICLES