Valproic acid quantification in human serum by LC-MS/MS

method development and comparison with immunoassay

Authors

  • Adriano Ronchi Spillere Faculdade de Farmácia - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4450-1104
    • Laura Alencastro de Azevedo Faculdade de Farmácia, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4982-8832
      • Juliana Severo Almeida Faculdade de Farmácia, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6924-0788
        • Sarah Carobini Werner de Souza Eller Franco de Oliveira Faculdade de Farmácia, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2200-6959
          • Tiago Franco de Oliveira Faculdade de Farmácia, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-8415
            • Bruno Pereira dos Santos Faculdade de Farmácia, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciências da Saúde - Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-5966
              • Simone Martins de Castro Faculdade de Farmácia, Laboratório de Análises Clínicas e Toxicológicas - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul image/svg+xml https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6707-9698

                DOI:

                https://doi.org/10.22456/dar.v10i1.154530

                Keywords:

                valproic acid, immunoassay, liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry, therapeutic drug monitoring

                Abstract

                 

                Valproic acid (VPA) is widely used for epilepsy management, however VPA serum concentration must be monitored because its narrow therapeutic range. Some methods are used to determine the plasma or serum VPA concentration, among them immunoassay-based tests are the most used. Although immunoassays may present cross-responses with other drugs or AE metabolites, increasing the uncertainty of the method. For this reason, a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry in tandem (LC-MS/MS) method was developed, validated and compared with particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA). For method optimization, the protein precipitation solvent was methanol and isopropanol (3:1) and a biphenyl column (50 x 3.0 mm, 2.7 μm) was used. The method showed selectivity and specificity, and it was linear from 25 to 450 µg/mL, presenting variation coefficient lower than 8,4% and inaccuracy within 10,9%. The matrix effect was 103.9%. The VPA quantification by both methods had good correlation and the VPA assay by LC-MS/MS was 6,85% higher when compared to the immunoassay, but it still gives the same clinical stratification. The validation was successful, with easy sample preparation and appropriate selectivity, applicable for VPA therapeutic drug monitoring.

                Downloads

                Download data is not yet available.

                References

                Freddo RJ. Estudos para obtenção e caracterização de sistemas nanoparticulados contendo ácido valproico e avaliação da penetração deste através da barreira hematoencefálica. Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRGS; 2009. Portuguese.

                Ministério da Saúde (BR). Relação Nacional de Medicamentos Essenciais Rename 2022. Brasília, DF: Ministério da Saúde, 2024. Portuguese.

                Sztajnkrycer MD. Valproic Acid Toxicity: Overview and Management. J Toxicol. 2002; 40(6):789-801. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1081/CLT-120014645

                Patsalos PN, Berry DJ, Bourgeois BFD, Cloyd JC, Glauser TA, Johannessen SI, Leppik IE, Tomson T, Perucca E. Antiepileptic drugsbest practice guidelines for therapeutic drug monitoring: A position paper by the subcommission on therapeutic drug monitoring, ILAE Commission on Therapeutic Strategies. Epilepsia. 2008; 49(7):1239-1276. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2008.01561.x

                Lheureux PER, Hantson P. Carnitine in the treatment of valproic acid-induced toxicity. Clin Toxicol, 2009; 47(2): 101-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650902752376

                Eadie MJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring - antiepileptic drugs. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2001; 52(S1):11-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2125.2001.0520s1011.x

                McMillin GA, Juenke JEM, Johnson MJ, Dasgupta A. Discordant carbamazepine values between two immunoassays: carbamazepine values determined by ADVIA centaur correlate better with those determined by LC-MS/MS than PETINIA assay. J Clin Lab Anal. 2011; 25(3):212-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.20460

                DʼUrso A, Ricotta T, de Grazia U. Evaluation of a Novel Immunoassay for Lacosamide Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. Ther Drug Monit. 2017; 39(6):663-668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000450

                Jannetto PJ. Therapeutic drug monitoring using mass spectrometry. In: Nair H, Clarke W, editors. Mass spectrometry for the clinical laboratory, 2017. p. 165-179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800871-3.00008-0

                Strathmann FG, Hoofnagle AN. Current and Future Applications of Mass Spectrometry to the Clinical Laboratory. Am J Clin Pathol. 2011; 136(4):609-616. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1309/AJCPW0TA8OBBNGCK

                ICH, EMA. M10 on bioanalytical method validation-Scientific guideline. European Medicines Agency. 2023.

                Matuszewski BK,Constanzer ML, Chavez-Eng CM. Strategies for the Assessment of Matrix Effect in Quantitative Bioanalytical Methods Based on HPLC−MS/MS. Anal Chem. 2003; 75(13):3019–3030. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ac020361s

                Hsu SA, Soldo J, Gupta M. Evaluation of two automated immunoassays for 25-OH vitamin D: Comparison against LC–MS/MS. Journal Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2013; 136: 139-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2012.11.005

                Giavarina D. Understanding bland altman analysis. Biochem Med. 2015; 25(2): 141-151. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2015.015

                Oyaert M, Peersman N, Kieffer D, Deiteren K, Smits A, Allegaert K, Spriet I, Van Eldere J, Verhaegen J, Vermeersch P, Pauwels S. Novel LC–MS/MS method for plasma vancomycin: Comparison with immunoassays and clinical impact. Clin Chim Acta. 2015; 441: 63-70. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2014.12.012

                Wang Z, Yun Y, Xie X, You C, Miao H, Zhang F, Gao S, Chen W. Comparison of LC-MS/MS vs chemiluminescent microparticle immunoassay in measuring the valproic acid concentration in plasma of epilepsy patients in a new perspective. J Clin Lab Anal. 2017; 32(1):e22157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.22157

                Bezerra MA, Lemos VA, Novaes CG, de Jesus RM, Filho HRS, Araújo SA, Alves JPS. Application of mixture design in analytical chemistry. Microchem J, 2020; 152: 104336 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2019.104336

                Lupo S, Kahler T, Connolly P. Accurate Pain Management Analysis in Under 5 Min on Raptor Biphenyl Superficially Porous Particle LC Columns. LCGC International. 2015 Mar [cited 2025 Jan]. Available from: https://www.chromatographyonline.com/view/accurate-pain-management-analysis-under-5-min-raptor-biphenyl-superficially-porous-particle-lc-col-2.

                Zhao M, Li G, Qiu F, Sun Y, Xu Y, Zhao L. Development and Validation of a Simple and Rapid UPLC–MS Assay for Valproic Acid and Its Comparison With Immunoassay and HPLC Methods. Ther Drug Monit. 2016; 38(2):246-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000000256

                Xia Y, Long JY, Shen MY, Dong N, Guo HL, Hu YH, Lu XP, Ding XS, Chen F, Qiu JC. Switching between LC-ESI-MS/MS and EMIT methods for routine TDM of valproic acid in pediatric patients with epilepsy: What clinicians and re searchers need to know. Front Pharmacol. 2021; 12: 750744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2021.750744

                Yang X, Jiang Z, Jiang Y, Ling J, Dong L, Zou S, Chen R, Hu N. Determination of valproic acid and its six metabolites in human serum by LC–MS/MS and application to interaction with carbapenems in epileptic patients. Biomed Chromatogr. 2022; 37(3), e5572. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bmc.5572

                Downloads

                Published

                16-07-2026

                How to Cite

                Ronchi Spillere, A., Azevedo, L. A. de, Almeida, J. S., Oliveira, S. C. W. de S. E. F. de, Oliveira, T. F. de, Pereira dos Santos, B., & Castro, S. M. de. (2026). Valproic acid quantification in human serum by LC-MS/MS: method development and comparison with immunoassay. Drug Analytical Research, 10(1), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.22456/dar.v10i1.154530

                Issue

                Section

                ORIGINAL ARTICLES