Intertextuality: considerations about dialogism

Abstract

This article has the purpose to contribute to the recognition of what has been agreed to be called dialogism, by Mikhail Bakhtin, when he first studied the French writer François Rabelais and other authors. The properties of dialogism were focused, after that, by Julia Kristeva, Robert Stam, Diana da Luz and José L.Fiorin, acquiring lhe denomination of intertextuality and even anthropophagy, as long as a discourse, no matter which, leads to others, as its nexus is built.’ to “ng up first in literary circles, lhe dialogical or intertextual phenomenon can be applied to ther media, like lhe plastic arts, cinema and publicity. The latter establishing a dialog h several voices (discourses), being perfectly recognized, reworked, and being introduc by performances distinguished from their predecessors. In this way, dialogical discourse s recognized when a relationship between distinct voices is shown and there is no need to reak up with their patterns, influences and predecessors, i.e., with their historical relationship.