Governance, legitimacy and peacekeeping

an automated content analysis of democracy in UN resolutions

Authors

  • Lucas Santana de Oliveira PPGCP/UFRGS

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.147996

Keywords:

UN; Post-Cold War; Africa

Abstract

The reestablishment of the multipolar and liberal order of the 1990s allowed international organizations, such as the UN system, to promote international humanitarian aid efforts and violence containment to promote peace in countries affected by civil wars. The democratic pathway stands as the main model for reconciliation of the parties to a conflict, between incumbent members of the government and rival or rebellious political groups. However, democracy still occupies an embryonic space in the paradigms of peacebuilding. Thus, this work aims to answer: how is the treatment given by the General Assembly and the Security Council regarding the issue of democracy based on the resolutions produced between 1991 and 2021? Content analysis of UN resolutions on the topic of democracy was carried out, with a view to identifying the main terms and thematic correlations present in the corpus through the use of the Descending Hierarchical Classification (DHC) technique via the Iramuteq software. It was concluded that the UN presents profuse normative diversification and the increase in terms related to hybrid governance such as “local”, “pluralism” and “civil society”. In addition, the word “democracy” showed high frequency but low co-occurrence with the generated word classes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ALDERSON, Kai; HURRELL, Andrew. Bull’s conception of International Society. [s. l.]: Springer, 2000. p. 3–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-62666-3_1

BARNETT, Michael; FINNEMORE, Martha. Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. [s. l.]: Cornell University Press, 2012.

BJÖRKDAHL, Annika; HÖGLUND, Kristine. Precarious peacebuilding: Friction in global-local encounters. Peacebuilding, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 3, p. 289-299, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21647259.2013.813170

BOUTROS-GHALI, Boutros. An Agenda for Development: Report of the Secretary General. Official Document of the 48th Session of the General Assembly under Agenda Item, [s. l.], v. 91, 1994.

BOUTROS-GHALI, Boutros. An agenda for peace: preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping: report of the Secretary-General pursuant to the statement adopted by the Summit Meeting of the Security Council on 31 January 1992. New York: UN Department of Public Information, 1992. Disponível em: <https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/145749/files/%5EST_%5EDPI_1247-EN.pdf>

BOUTROS-GHALI, Boutros. An agenda for democratization. New York: UN Department of Public Information, 1996. Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/230086/files/An_agenda_for_democratization.pdf

CERVI, Emerson. Análise de conteúdo automatizada para conversações em redes sociais online: uma proposta metodológica. 48° Encontro Anual Anpocs, Caxambu, MG, ed. 48, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.anpocs.com/index.php/apers-40-encontro-3/gt-31/gt17-22/11253-analise-de-conteudo-automatizada-para-conversacoes-em-redes-sociais-online-uma-proposta-metodologica/file. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2022.

CLARK, Ian. Legitimacy in international society. [s. l.]: Oxford University Press, USA, 2005.

DINGWERTH, Klaus; SCHMIDTKE, Henning; WEISE, Tobias. The rise of democratic legitimation: why international organizations speak the language of democracy. European Journal of International Relations, [s. l.], v. 26, n. 3, p. 714-741, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066119882488

EIZENGA, Daniel. Peacebuilding and Democracy in Africa. In: CHARBONNEAU, B; RICARD, M. (Eds.). Routledge Handbook of African Peacebuilding. [s. l.]: Routledge, 2022. p. 155-168. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429060038-14

EJDUS, Filip. Revisiting the Local Turn in Peacebuilding. In: KUSTERMANS, J.; SAUER, T.; SEGAERT, B. (Eds.). A REQUIEM FOR PEACEBUILDING? [s. l.]: Springer, 2020. p. 41-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_3

GAZELEY, Joe. The strong “weak state”: French statebuilding and military rule in Mali. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding, [s. l.], v. 16, n. 3, p. 269-286, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17502977.2022.2030627

HAACKE, Jürgen. Myanmar and the United Nations. Adelphi Paper, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 381, p. 83-96, 2006. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/05679320600831946

IKENBERRY, G. John. A world safe for democracy: Liberal internationalism and the crises of global order. Yale University Press, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300256093

JOYNER, Christopher C. The United Nations and Democracy. Global Governance, v. 5, n. 3, p. 333-357, 1999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/19426720-00503004

JR, Claude. Collective legitimization as a political function of the United Nations. International organization, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 3, p. 367-379, 1966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300012832

KUSTERMANS, Jorg; SAUER, Tom; SEGAERT, Barbara. Peacebuilding’s predicament: A dark mood among the experts. A Requiem for Peacebuilding? p. 1-14, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56477-3_1

LAHLOU, Saadi. L’analyse lexicale. Variances, n. 3, p. 13-24, 1994.

LENZ, Tobias; SCHMIDTKE, Henning. Agents, audiences and peers: why international organizations diversify their legitimation discourse. International Affairs, v. 99, n. 3, p. 921-940, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiac323

LENZ, Tobias; SÖDERBAUM, Fredrik. The origins of legitimation strategies in international organizations: agents, audiences and environments. International Affairs, v. 99, n. 3, p. 899-920, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad110

ORFORD, Anne. International authority and the responsibility to protect. [s. l.]: Cambridge University Press, 2011. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973574

OTTAWAY, Marina. African Democratisation and the Leninist Option. The Journal of Modern African Studies, v. 35, n. 1, p. S0022278X97002309, mar. 1997. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022278X97002309

PAFFENHOLZ, Thania. Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: a critical assessment towards an agenda for future research. Third World Quarterly, v. 36, n. 5, p. 857-874, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1029908

RICHMOND, Oliver P. The dilemmas of a hybrid peace: Negative or positive? Cooperation and Conflict, v. 50, n. 1, p. 50-68, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836714537053

SALVIATI, Maria Elisabeth. Manual do aplicativo Iramuteq. Recuperado mar, v. 3, p. 2020, 2017.

SANTISO, Carlos. Promoting democratic governance and preventing the recurrence of conflict: The role of the United Nations development programme in post-conflict peace-building. Journal of Latin American Studies, v. 34, n. 3, p. 555-586, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022216X02006508

SARAIVA, Rui. Micro-evidence from Participatory Conflict Analysis: Toward Context-Specific Adaptive Peacebuilding in Mozambique. In: KUBOTA, Yuichi (Org.). Micro-evidence for Peacebuilding Theories and Policies. Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore, 2022. p. 89-111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-4899-2_5

SENDING, Ole Jacob. Recognition and liquid authority. International Theory, v. 9, n. 2, p. 311-328, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971916000282

SPANDLER, Kilian; SÖDERBAUM, Fredrik. Populist (de) legitimation of international organizations. International Affairs, v. 99, n. 3, p. 1023-1041, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad048

STEIN, Arthur; ZAHAR, Marie-Joëlle. The United Nations and the African Union: Partners or Rivals in Peace Operations? In: Routledge Handbook of African Peacebuilding. [s. l.]: Routledge, 2022. p. 26-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429060038-4

UNITED NATIONS. Promoting and Consolidating Democracy: Resolution /: Adopted by the General Assembly. [s. l.], 2001. Disponível em: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/428998?v=pdf. Acesso em: 12 set. 2025.

VOLPE, Valentina. The Importance of Being Earnest. The United Nations and Democracy-Promotion. In: Mentoring Comparative Lawyers: Methods, Times, and Places: Liber Discipulorum Mauro Bussani. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. p. 219-235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34754-3_12

WILÉN, Nina. Capacity-building or capacity-taking? Legitimizing concepts in peace and development operations. International Peacekeeping, v. 16, n. 3, p. 337-351, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13533310903036392

ZÜRN, Michael. A theory of global governance: Authority, legitimacy, and contestation. [s. l.]: Oxford University Press, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198819974.001.0001

ZÜRN, Michael; BINDER, Martin; ECKER-EHRHARDT, Matthias. International authority and its politicization. International theory, v. 4, n. 1, p. 69-106, 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971912000012

Published

2025-10-23

How to Cite

Santana de Oliveira, L. (2025). Governance, legitimacy and peacekeeping: an automated content analysis of democracy in UN resolutions. Conjuntura Austral, 16(75), 37–59. https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.147996

Issue

Section

RESEARCH
Received 2025-06-04
Accepted 2025-09-29
Published 2025-10-23

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.