Patterns and interconnections of Brazilian and Chinese agricultural sector in international food regimes

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.131156

Keywords:

Food regimes, Brazil, China, Incorporated comparison

Abstract

In the last years, Brazil and China have been extensively analyzed by several social science disciplines, especially in questions about the impacts suffered by the Brazilian economy due to Chinese demand for commodities. The present article seeks to contribute to the debate on the interactions of these two national actors through the perspective of international food regimes. For this, a historical description based on the incorporated comparison method is constructed, in addition to a bibliographical review in face of empirical data found in public databases. With this, the article describes some of the main patterns of the international food regimes and partially understands the productive, commercial and political interconnections of the agricultural sectors of Brazil and China, specifically in the last food regime.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AEI, American Enterprise Institute. China Global Investment Tracker | American Enterprise Institute - AEI. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://www.aei.org/china-global-investment-tracker/. Acesso em: 5 abr. 2023.

ANDERSSON, Martin; TILL, Emilie Rohne. Between the Engine and the Fifth Wheel: an Analytical Survey of the Shifting Roles of Agriculture in Development Theory. In: PINILLA, Vicente; WILLEBALD, Henry (eds). Agricultural Development in the World Periphery A Global Economic History Approach. Londres: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018. p. 29–62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_2

APARICIO, Gema et al. The World Periphery in Global Agricultural and Food Trade, 1900–2000. In: PINILLA, Vicente; WILLEBALD, Henry (eds.) Agricultural Development in the World Periphery A Global Economic History Approach. Londres: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018. p. 63–88. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_3

ARAGÃO, Daniel Maurício de; SANTOS, Tiago Matos dos. A governança global do desenvolvimento e a despolitização do land grabbing: “there is no alternative”?. Estudos Internacionais, Belo Horizonte, v. 5, n. 2, 2017. Disponível em: http://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2017v5.n2.p57. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5752/P.2317-773X.2017v5n2p57

BANCO MUNDIAL. Rural Population (% of Total population) - China | Data. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SP.RUR.TOTL.ZS?locations=CN. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2021.

BENEDICT, Kennette. Global Governance. In: WRIGHT, James D.; International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences. Nova York: Elsevier. 2015, p. 151-161. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75018-5. Acessso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.75018-5

BIELER, Andreas; MOORE, Madeleine. Water grabbing, capitalist accumulation and resistance: conceptualising the multiple dimensions of class struggle. Global Labour Journal, [s. l.], v. 14, n. 1, 2023. Disponível em: https://mulpress.mcmaster.ca/globallabour/article/view/5074/4365. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15173/glj.v14i1.5074

BROWN, Trent. When food regimes become hegemonic: Agrarian India through Gramscian lens. Journal of Agrarian Change, [s. l.] v. 20, n. 1, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12344. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12344

CEPEA, Centro de Estudos Avançados em Economia Aplicada. PIB do Agronegócio Brasileiro - Centro de Estudos Avançados em Economia Aplicada - CEPEA-Esalq/USP. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://www.cepea.esalq.usp.br/br/pib-do-agronegocio-brasileiro.aspx. Acesso em: 4 maio 2023.

CONAB, Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento. Portal de Informações Agropecuárias. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://portaldeinformacoes.conab.gov.br/safra-serie-historica-graos.html.

DELGADO, Guilherme Costa. A Questão Agrária no Brasil, 1950-2003. In: Questão Agrária no Brasil: Perspectiva Histórica e Configuração Atual. São Paulo: Instituto Nacional De Colonização E Reforma Agrária, 2005. p. 21–86.

DELGADO, Guilherme Costa. Do Capital Financeiro Na Agricultura À Economia Do Agronegócio: Mudanças Cíclicas Em Meio Século (1965-2012). Porto Alegre: Editora Da UFRGS, 2012.

ESCHER, Fabiano; WILKINSON, John. A Economia Política do complexo Soja-Carne Brasil-China, Revista de Economia e Sociologia Rural, p. 656-678, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2019.191017. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9479.2019.191017

ESCHER, Fabiano; WESZ JUNIOR, Valdemar João. Dinâmica recente do complexo soja-carne Brasil-China. Revista Campo-Território, [s. l.], v. 17, n. 46, p. 131–151, 2022. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.14393/RCT174606. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14393/RCT174606

FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAOSTAT. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2021.

FAO, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Sustainable food systems: concept and framework. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.fao.org/3/ca2079en/CA2079EN.pdf. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023.

FIRMIANO, Frederico Daia. “Quem Lamenta Os Estragos – Se Os Frutos São Prazeres?" O Bloco De Poder Agro do Governo Bolsonaro. Estudos, Sociedade E Agricultura, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 2, 2020. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.36920/esa-v28n2-5. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36920/esa-v28n2-5

FPA, Frente Parlamentar da Agropecuária. História da FPA. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: https://fpagropecuaria.org.br/historia-da-fpa/. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2021.

FRANK, Andre Gunder. Acumulação Mundial. Rio de Janeiro: Zahar Editores, 1977.

FRIEDMANN, Harriet. The Political Economy of Food: The Rise and Fall of the Postwar International Food Order. American Journal of Sociology, [s. l.], v. 88, n. Marxist Inquiries: Studies of Labor, Class, and States, p. 248–286, 1982. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/3083245. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/649258

FRIEDMANN, Harriet; MCMICHAEL, Philip. Agriculture And The State System: The rise and decline of national agricultures, 1870 to the present. Sociologia Ruralis, [s. l.], v. 29, n. 2, p. 93–117, 1989. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9523.1989.tb00360.x

GIRAUDO, Maria Eugenia. Dependent development in South America: china and the soybean nexus. Journal Of Agrarian Change, [s. l.] v. 20, n. 1, p. 60-78, 2019. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/joac.12333 Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joac.12333

HOLANDA, Sérgio Buarque. Raízes do Brasil. 27. ed. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2014.

KORSNES, Marius; LIU, Chen. Meating demand in China: changes in chinese meat cultures through times. In: HANSEN, Arve.; SYSE, Karen Lykke. Changing meat cultures: Food practices, global capitalism and the consumption of animals. Londres: Rowman e Littlefield, 2021, p. 79-98.

LI, Minqi. The rise of China and the demise of the capitalist world-economy. Nova York: Monthly Review Press, 2008.

MADDISON, Angus. The World Economy. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2001. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1787/19900295. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/19900295

MEDEIROS, Carlos Aguiar; CINTRA, Maria Rita Vital Paganini. Impacto da ascensão chinesa sobre os países latino-americanos. Revista de Economia Política, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 1, 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a02 Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/0101-31572015v35n01a02

MCKAY, Ben M.; et al. China and Latin America: towards a new consensus of resource control?. Third World Thematics, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 5, 2016. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1344564. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23802014.2016.1344564

MCMICHAEL, Philip. A Food Regime Genealogy. The Journal of Peasant Studies, [s. l.], v. 36, n. 1, p. 139–169, 2009. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820354. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150902820354

MCMICHAEL, Philip. Does China’s “going out” strategy prefigure a new food regime? The Journal of Peasant Studies, [s. l.], v. 47, n. 1, p. 116–154, 2019. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1693368. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2019.1693368

MCMICHAEL, Philip. Incorporating Comparison within a World-Historical Perspective: an Alternative Comparative Method. American Sociological Review, [s. l.], v. 55, n. 3, p. 385–397, 1990. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2095763. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2095763

MCMICHAEL, Philip. World-System analysis, globalization and incorporated comparison. Journal of World-System Research, [s. l.], v. 3, n. 1, p. 68–99, 2000. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.192. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5195/jwsr.2000.192

MDIC, Ministério da Indústria, Comércio Exterior e Serviços. ComexVis. [S. l.], 2023. Disponível em: http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/pt/comex-vis. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023.

MDICb, Ministério da Indústria, Comércio Exterior e Serviços. ComexStat-China. [S. l.], 2021. Disponível em: http://comexstat.mdic.gov.br/pt/geral/41110. Acesso em: 5 ago. 2021.

NOGUEIRA, Isabela. O Estado na China. Oikos, [s. l.], v. 20, n. 1, p. 6–16, 2021. Disponível em: https://revistas.ufrj.br/index.php/oikos/article/view/52047. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023.

ORTIZ-OSPINA, Esteban; BELTEKIAN, Diana. Trade and Globalization. [S. l.], 2018. Disponível em: https://ourworldindata.org/trade-and-globalization. Acesso em: 25 ago. 2021.

OURIQUES, Helton Ricardo; VIEIRA, Pedro Antonio. A condição semiperiférica do Brasil na economia-mundo capitalista: novas Evidências. Carta Internacional, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 3, p. 199, 2017. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v12n3.2017.711. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21530/ci.v12n3.2017.711

PATEL, Raj. The Long Green Revolution. Journal of Peasant Studies, [s. l.], v. 40, n. 1, p. 1–63, 2013. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.719224. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2012.719224

PINILLA, Vicente; WILLEBALD, Henry. Agricultural Development in the World Periphery: A General Overview. In: PINILLA, Vicente; WILLEBALD, Henry (eds). Agricultural Development in the World Periphery A Global Economic History Approach. Londres: Palgrave MacMillan, 2018. p. 3–27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66020-2_1

PINTO, Rubens Marcelo Campos. Investimento direto estrangeiro chinês e participação chinesa em projetos de infraestrutura no estado de São Paulo, Brasil: uma análise baseada na urbanização planetária e nos circuitos do capital. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Urbanos e Regionais, [s. l.], v. 25, n. 1, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202306. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22296/2317-1529.rbeur.202306

POMPEIA, Caio. Concertação e poder: o agronegócio como fenômeno político no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, [s. l.], v. 35, n. 104, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/3510410/2020

PRADO JR., Caio. Formação do Brasil contemporâneo: Colônia. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2011.

RU, Sung Hee. A comparison of Weber’s and Wallerstein’s historical methods: the contribution of Weber’s methods in developing existing world-systems methods. Journal of Asian Sociology, [s. l.], v. 52, n. 1, 2023. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.2307/27211833. Acesso em: 07 jun. 2023.

SANTOS, Maureen; GLASS, Verena (orgs.). Altas do agronegócio: fatos e números sobre as corporações que controlam o que comemos. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Heinrich Boll, 2018. Disponível em: https://br.boell.org/sites/default/files/atlas_agro_final_06-09.pdf. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023.

SCHNEIDER, Sergio; SCHUBERT, Maycon Noremberg; ESCHER, Fabiano. Regimes agroalimentares e o lugar da agricultura familiar: uma apresentação ao debate. Revista Mundi Meio Ambiente e Agrárias, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1, 2016. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.21575/25254790rmmaa2016vol1n1134. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21575/25254790rmmaa2016vol1n1134

TIMMER, C. Peter. A World without Agriculture: The Structural Transformation in Historical Perspective. Washington: AEI Press, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.aei.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/-a-world-without-agriculture-the-structural-transformation-in-historical-perspective_145442400043.pdf. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023.

TURZI, Mariano. The Political Economy of Agricultural Booms. Londres: Springer International Publishing, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45946-2

VIEIRA, Pedro Antonio. As três fases da China na economia-mundo capitalista: incorporação forçada e parcial (1840-1949), retraimento e incorporação mínima (1949-1978), integração total, voluntária e irreversível (1978-presente). In: Desigualdade, geocultura e desenvolvimento na economia-mundo capitalista contemporânea: olhar desde as (semi)periferias. Florianópolis: Insular, 2022. p. 175–207.

WALLERSTEIN, Immanuel. O Sistema Mundial Moderno: A agricultura capitalista e as origens da economia-mundo europeia no século XVI. Porto: Edições Afrontamentos, 1974. v. 1.

WONG, R. Bin. The Political Economy of the Agrarian Empire and Its Modern Legacy. In: China and historical capitalism: genealogies of sinological knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999. p. 210–245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511470707.008

WONG, R. Bin. Transformations of China’s post-1949 political economy in an historical perspective. Pacific Economic Review, [s. l.], v. 13, n. 3, p. 291–307, 2008. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2008.00402.x. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0106.2008.00402.x

YAO, Shujie. How Important is Agriculture in China’s Economic Growth? Oxford Development Studies, [s. l.], v. 28, n. 1, p. 33–49, 2000. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/713688306. Acesso em: 05 abr. 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/713688306

ZHANG, Hongzhou. Securing the “Rice Bowl”: China and Global Food Security. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0236-7

Published

2023-08-13

How to Cite

Tixiliski, G. O. (2023). Patterns and interconnections of Brazilian and Chinese agricultural sector in international food regimes. Conjuntura Austral, 14(67), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.131156

Issue

Section

RESEARCH
Received 2023-03-27
Accepted 2023-06-29
Published 2023-08-13

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.