State and Power Relations: notes for a debate about public policies

Authors

  • Hugo Feitosa Gonçalves Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (PPGCS/UFRN)
  • Rosilene Dias Montenegro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.88619

Keywords:

State, Public Policy, Power Relations, Epistemology.

Abstract

This essay has as theoretical framework the debate on "State", "power relations" and "public policies". With the objective of presenting a theoretical-epistemological debate and describe a methodological basis for analyzing the power relations in the structures of the capitalist State in the production of public policies, it is sought to answer: which categories are considered relevant, in the different theoretical perspectives, in an analysis of public policy making processes? Based on a review of the literature, this essay turns initially to present different conceptions about the State, public policies and some of the most important actors and influential factors in the process of policy making. At the last moment we present analytical factors, from an interactionist perspective, of mutual influence, between the superstructures and the social, institutional and individual structures, for the analysis of the relations in the process of production of public policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Hugo Feitosa Gonçalves, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (PPGCS/UFRN)

Doutorando em Ciências Sociais pelo Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Sociais (PPGCS) da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN). Integrante do Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas sobre Estado e Lutas de Classes na América Latina (Práxis) da Universidade Federal de Campina Grande (UFCG) e do Grupo de Pesquisa sobre a Economia do Nordeste (GPNe) da UFCG.

Published

2019-08-28

How to Cite

Gonçalves, H. F., & Dias Montenegro, R. (2019). State and Power Relations: notes for a debate about public policies. Revista Debates, 13(2), 5–23. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.88619

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.