The despise of electoral politics: crisis of representation and counter-democratic legitimacy on Rosanvallon’s work

Authors

  • Luanda Dias Schramm UFRJ

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.60905

Keywords:

Representation, Participation, Legitimacy, Democracy.

Abstract

The paper analyzes the recent transformations in representative democracy in the contributions of Pierre Rosanvallon, from the perspective of a more just and equitable democracy. Rosanvallon opposes the reduction of democratic politics to the electoral procedure, and proposes a theory that intends to expand the meaning of political action beyond electoral mechanism. The idea of counter-democracy integrates all the instiutuitions that would act as counterpoint, creating new forms of political legitimation, absent in the minimalist conceptions of electoral democracy. Instead of lamenting the fall of the electoral system as a vehicle of popular will, the French author celebrates the emergence of non-electoral forms of accountability. The article argues that, although he intends to expand the meaning of political action beyond the formal representation, Rosanvallon promotes the disqualification of electoral politics and depoliticises the representation for the benefit of unelected powers.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Luanda Dias Schramm, UFRJ

Doutora em Ciência Política pela Universidade de Brasília - UnB (2014). Mestre em Comunicação pela Universidade Federal Fluminense - UFF (2003). Bacharel em Comunicação Social - Jornalismo pela Universidade Federal de Goiás - UFG (2000). Atualmente é professora substituta da Escola de Comunicação da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro - ECO-UFRJ. Possui interesse nos seguintes temas: cidadania, democracia, representação política, estudos de mídia, estudos culturais e estudos de recepção.

Published

2016-12-22

How to Cite

Schramm, L. D. (2016). The despise of electoral politics: crisis of representation and counter-democratic legitimacy on Rosanvallon’s work. Revista Debates, 10(3), 107–129. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.60905

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.