IndoLoR -- Uma Plataforma Adaptável para Localização em Ambientes Internos
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/2175-2745.78391Keywords:
Indoor, Environment, Location, Adaptability, IndoLoRAbstract
Os sistemas de localização têm se tornado cada vez mais parte integrante da vida das pessoas. Em ambientes externos, o GPS se apresenta como tecnologia padrão, largamente difundida e utilizada. No entanto, as pessoas
costumam passar a maior parte do seu tempo dentro de ambientes internos, como: hospitais, universidades, fábricas, edifícios, entre outros. Nesses ambientes, o GPS tem seu funcionamento comprometido não obtendo
um posicionamento preciso. Atualmente, para realizar a localização de pessoas ou objetos em ambientes internos não existe nenhuma tecnologia que consiga atingir
os mesmos resultados obtidos pelo GPS em ambientes externos. Devido a isso, é necessário considerar a utilização de informações provenientes de diversas fontes fazendo uso de diferentes tecnologias. Dessa forma, esse trabalho
tem como objetivo geral construir uma plataforma adaptável para localização em ambientes internos. Baseado nesse objetivo, é proposta a plataforma IndoLoR. Essa plataforma tem como objetivos permitir o recebimento de informações provenientes de diferentes fontes, além de realizar o processamento, fusão, armazenamento e disponibilização dessas informações parao contexto da localização em ambientes internos. A plataforma proposta é avaliada através de um estudo de caso verificando aspectos relativos a facilidade de adaptação e performance.
Downloads
References
HE, J. et al. A practical indoor toa ranging error model for localization algorithm. In: IEEE. 2011 IEEE 22nd International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications. Toronto, Canada: IEEE, 2011. v. 1.
LIU, H. et al. Survey of wireless indoor positioning techniques and systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C., v. 37, n. 6, p. 1067–1080, 2007.
HIGHTOWER, J.; BORRIELLO, G. Location systems for ubiquitous computing. Comput., v. 34, n. 8, p. 57–66, 2001.
SATYANARAYANAN, M. Pervasive computing: Vision and challenges. Personal Commun., v. 8, n. 4, p. 10–17, 2001.
WIN, M. Z. et al. Network localization and navigation via cooperation. IEEE COMMUN MAG, v. 49, n. 5, p. 56–62, 2011.
SIMONI, M. et al. Indoor air pollution and respiratory health in the elderly. Eur Respir J., v. 21, n. 40 suppl, p. 15–20, 2003.
DODGE, D. Why Indoor Location will be bigger than GPS or Maps, and how it works. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://dondodge.typepad.com/the_next_big_thing/2013/ 04/why-indoor-location-will-be-bigger-than-gps-or-maps. html>.
RESEARCH, O. Mapping the Indoor Marketing Opportunity. 2015. Online. Disponível em: .
JUNAIO. Junaio Augmented Reality Browser. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <https://itunes.apple.com/br/app/ junaio-augmented-reality-browser/id337415615?mt=8>.
MAZEMAP. Mazemap. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <https://use.mazemap.com/?v=1>.
BEESTAR. Insight. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://www.beestar.eu/>.
ANYPLACE. AnyPlace. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://anyplace.cs.ucy.ac.cy/>.
FRAUNHOFER. awiloc. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://www.iis.fraunhofer.de/en/ff/lok/tech/feldstaerke/rssi.
html>.
LIPS. Local Indoor Positioning System. 2015. Online.
Disponível em: <http://lips.si/>.
POINTINSIDE. storemode. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://www.pointinside.com/storemode/ indoor-mapping/>.
HERE. Consumer. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <https://company.here.com/consumer/>.
GLOPOS. GloPos. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://glopos.com/indoor-positioning.html>.
HOFFMANN-WELLENHOF, B.; LICHTENEGGER, H.; COLLINS, J. GPS: theory and practice. 5. ed. Vienna, Áustria: Springer-Verlag Wien, 1994. v. 1.
KAPLAN, E.; HEGARTY, C. Understanding GPS: principles and applications. 2. ed. Boston, USA: Artech house, 2005. v. 1.
CHOSA, T. et al. Evaluation of the dynamic accuracy of a gps receiver: Is dynamic accuracy the same as static. EAEF, v. 4, n. 2, p. 54 – 61, 2011.
LEMIC, F. et al. Web-based platform for evaluation of rf-based indoor localization algorithms. In: ICCW. IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop. London, UK: IEEE, 2015. v. 1.
GOOGLE. Indoor Maps. 2014. Online. Disponível em: <http://www.google.com/intl/pt-BR/maps/about/partners/
indoormaps/>.
APPLE. Footprint: Indoor Positioning with
Core Location. 2015. Online. Disponível em: .
INSIDER, B. Apple Is Launching A Vast Project To Map The Inside Of Every Large Building It Can. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://www.businessinsider.com/ apple-indoor-mapping-project-and-ibeacon-2014-6>.
SUMMIT, D. Indoor Positioning and Beacons:. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <http://www.technologyreview.com/summit/14/ digital/video/watch/indoor-positioning-and-beacons/>.
LYMBEROPOULOS, D. et al. A realistic evaluation and comparison of indoor location technologies: Experiences and lessons learned. In: NATH, S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2015. v. 1.
MELO, M.; AQUINO, G. A taxonomy of technologies for fingerprint-based indoor localization. In: ALMEIDA, H. (Ed.). 7o Simpósio Brasileiro de Computação Ubíqua e Pervasiva. Recife, Brazil: SBC, 2015. (1, v. 1).
MELO, M.; AQUINO, G. Categorization of technologies used for fingerprint-based indoor localization. In: BORCOCI, E. et al. (Ed.). Tenth International Conference on Systems and Networks Communications. Barcelona, Spain: IEEE, 2015. v. 1.
RAZZAQUE, M. Middleware for internet of things: a survey. IEEE IoT J., v. 3, n. 1, p. 70–95, 2016.
CAPRA, L.; EMMERICH, W.; MASCOLO, C. Reflective middleware solutions for context-aware applications. In: YONEZAWA, A.; MATSUOKA, S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Metalevel Architectures and Separation of Crosscutting Concerns. London, UK, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2001. v. 1.
HIGHTOWER, J.; BRUMITT, B.; BORRIELLO, G. The location stack: A layered model for location in ubiquitous computing. In: WMCSA. Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2002. v. 1.
NAJIB, W.; KLEPAL, M.; WIBOWO, S. B. Mapume: Scalable middleware for location aware computing applications. In: MOREIRA, A.; MAUTZ, R. (Ed.). 2011 International Conference on Indoor Positioning and Indoor Navigation. Guimaraes, Portugal: IEEE, 2011. v. 1.
STEVENSON, G. et al. Loc8: A location model and extensible framework for programming with location. IEEE Pervasive Comput., v. 9, n. 1, p. 28–37, 2010.
RANGANATHAN, A. et al. Middlewhere: A middleware for location awareness in ubiquitous computing applications. In: JACOBSEN, H.-A. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IFIP/USENIX International Conference on Middleware. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2004. v. 1. [35] TARVAINEN, P. Adaptability evaluation at software architecture level. TOCENGJ, v. 2, n. 1, p. 1–30, 2008.
GRESSMANN, B.; KLIMEK, H.; TURAU, V. Towards ubiquitous indoor location based services and indoor navigation. In: ZEISBERG, S.; KAISER, T. (Ed.). 2010 7th Workshop on Positioning, Navigation and Communication. Dresden, Germany: IEEE, 2010. v. 1.
SIMON, R.; FRöHLICH, P.; ANEGG, H. Beyond location based–the spatially aware mobile phone. In: CARSWELL, J. D.; TEZUKA, T. (Ed.). Web and wireless geographical information systems. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2006, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 4295). p. 12–21.
CLEMENTS, P. et al. Documenting Software Architectures: Views and Beyond. 2. ed. Boston, USA: Addison-Wesley Professional, 2003. v. 1.
ERL, T. SOA Principles of Service Design. 1st. ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice Hall Press, 2016. v. 1.
SUBRAMANIAN, N.; CHUNG, L. Metrics for Software Adaptability. [S.l.], 1999. v. 1, n. 1, 95–108 p.
FAYAD, M.; CLINE, M. P. Aspects of software adaptability. COMMUN. ACM, v. 39, n. 10, p. 58–59, 1996.
KRIENS, P.; HARGRAVE, B. Listeners considered harmful: The whiteboard pattern. San Ramon, USA, 2004.
YIN, R. K. Case study research: Design and methods. 1. ed. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage publications, 2013. v. 1.
KITCHENHAM, B.; PICKARD, L.; PFLEEGER, S. L. Case studies for method and tool evaluation. IEEE software, v. 1, n. 4, p. 52–62, 1995.
SIMON, R.; FRÖHLICH, P.; ANEGG, H. Guidelines for conducting and reporting case study research in software engineering. EMPIR SOFTW ENG, v. 14, n. 2, p. 131–164, 2009.
KONRAD, P. W. T. Wifi compass wifi access point
localization with android devices. Dissertação (Mestrado) — Information Security program at St. Polten University of
Applied Sciences, St. Polten, Áustria, 2012.
HAN, D. et al. Passive and active network measurement. In: HUTCHISON, D. et al. (Ed.). Computer Communication Networks and Telecommunications. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2009, (Lecture Notes in Computer Science, v. 5448). p. 99–108.
MONGODB. MongoDB. 2015. Online. Disponível em: <https://www.mongodb.org>.
LIU, X.; WANG, Q. Study on application of a quantitative evaluation approach for software architecture adaptability. In: TSE, T. H. (Ed.). Fifth International Conference on Quality Software. Melbourne, Australy: IEEE, 2005. v. 1.
COSTAGLIOLA, G. et al. Class point: an approach for the size estimation of object-oriented systems. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., v. 31, n. 1, p. 52–74, 2005.
RAIBULET, C.; MASCIADRI, L. Evaluation of dynamic adaptivity through metrics: an achievable. In: WICSA/ECSA. Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture & European Conference on Software Architecture. Cambridge, UK: IEEE, 2009. v. 1.
RAIBULET, C.; MASCIADRI, L. Metrics for the evaluation of adaptivity aspects in software systems. J Advances softw., v. 3, n. 1 & 2, p. 238–251, 2010.
