Salta al menu principale di navigazione Salta al contenuto principale Salta al piè di pagina del sito

Artigos

v. 2, n. 1 (2020)

Pessimism and monstrosity: a comparative analysis between Frankenstein and The Hunger Games

DOI
https://doi.org/10.22456/2596-0911.99582
Inviata
gennaio 10, 2020
Pubblicato
2020-06-13

Abstract

This research intends to demonstrate the pessimistic perspective regarding technological and scientific progress in the trilogy The Hunger Games, by Suzanne Collins. We start from the analysis of some elements in Frankenstein, by Mary Shelley, one of the first science-fiction novels. We are grounded on theoretical writings of authors that shared the same pessimistic point of view. Furthermore, this article investigates the faces of monstrosity in the trilogy The Hunger Games, and takes into account, albeit to a lesser extent, the contrast with the creature created by Victor Frankenstein. Our objective, despite the focus on Collins’ trilogy, is to show how these narratives, written with an interval of almost two hundred years, converge into the same questioning about the future.


Keywords: Science-fiction. Dystopia. Progress. Pessimism. Monstrosity.

Riferimenti bibliografici

  1. ALDISS, Brian. Billion Year Spree: the true history of science fiction. New York:
  2. Doubleday, 1973.
  3. AMABIS, José Mariano; MARTHO, Gilberto Rodrigues. Biologia em contexto: do
  4. universo às células vivas. São Paulo: Moderna, 2013a.
  5. AMABIS, José Mariano; MARTHO, Gilberto Rodrigues. Biologia em contexto: Adaptação e continuidade da vida. São Paulo: Moderna, 2013b.
  6. ARENDT, Hannah. The Origins of Totalitarianism. Orlando: Harcourt, 1973.
  7. ARENDT, Hannah. On Violence. In: HAUGAARD, Mark (Org.). Power: a reader. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 2002.
  8. BENJAMIN, Walter. A obra de arte na época da sua reprodutibilidade técnica. In: BENJAMIN, Walter. Magia e técnica, arte e política – ensaios sobre literatura e história da cultura. Obras escolhidas, volume I. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense, 1985.
  9. BENJAMIN, Walter. Sobre o conceito da História. In: BENJAMIN, Walter. Magia e
  10. técnica, arte e política – ensaios sobre literatura e história da cultura. Obras
  11. escolhidas, volume I. São Paulo: Editora Brasiliense, 1985.
  12. CACIOPPO, John T.; CACIOPPO, Stephanie. Social relationships and health: the toxic effects of perceived social isolation. Social and personality physiology compass, New Jersey, v. 8, n. 2, p. 58-72, fev. 2014.
  13. CARROLL, Noel. The philosophy of horror or paradoxes of the heart. New York: Routledge, 1990.
  14. COLLINS, Suzanne. The Hunger Games. New York: Scholastic Press, 2008.
  15. COLLINS, Suzanne. Catching Fire. New York: Scholastic Press, 2009.
  16. COLLINS, Suzanne. Mockingjay. New York: Scholastic Press, 2010.
  17. HANSEN, Michelle Kay. Monsters in our midst: an examination of human
  18. monstrosity in fiction and film of the United States. 2012. 165f. Dissertation
  19. (Doctor of Philosophy in English) – Department of English, University of
  20. Nevada, Las Vegas, NV.
  21. KAVADLO, Jesse. American popular culture in the era of terror: falling skies, dark knights rising, and collapsing cultures. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO, LCC, 2015.
  22. LE GUIN, Ursula K. Introduction. In: LE GUIN, Ursula K. The Left Hand of
  23. Darkness. New York: Ace Books, 2010.
  24. MARCZWSKI, Maurício; VÉLEZ, Eduardo. Ciências Biológicas. São Paulo: FTD, 1999.
  25. MCCLANTOC, Keshia. Welcome to the Arena: Deconstructing the Female
  26. Character in Dystopian Literature. Proceedings of the National Conference on
  27. Undergraduate Research (NCUR) 2016. University of North Carolina Asheville, p.
  28. -517, 2016.
  29. NORDHAUS, William D. The Economics of New Goods. Chicago: University of
  30. Chicago Press, 1996.
  31. RADCLIFFE, Ann. On the Supernatural in Poetry. The New Monthly Magazine, London, v. 16, n. 1, p. 145–152, 1826.
  32. SHELLEY, Mary. Frankenstein. New York: Barnes & Noble, 2015.
  33. SHELLEY, Mary. Introduction. In: SHELLEY, Mary. Frankenstein. New York:
  34. Barnes & Noble, 2015.

Downloads

I dati di download non sono ancora disponibili.