Development and application of the Portuguese version of the instrument for assessment of the quality of life of the World Health Organization (WHOQOL100)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22491/2357-9730.125050Keywords:
Quality of life, World Health Organization, cross-cultural, validity, rating scaleAbstract
OBJECTIVE: The World Health Organization developed an instrument to assess quality of life in the framework of a collaborative multicentric project. The methodology and the different stages of developing the original instrument are described. Next, the developing of the portuguese version is presented as well as its application in 300 patients in Porto Alegre, south Brazil.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Through a singular methodology, translation, discussionin focal groups with community members, patients and health professionals was performed followed by back translation.
RESULTS: The instrument showed a good psychometric performance with good internal consistency, discriminant validity, criterion validity, concurrent validity and reliability.
CONCLUSIONS: The authors concluded showing that the instrument is ready to be used in Brazil, being important to evaluate its performance in other regions and different samples.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).