Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process

Authors

  • Alessandra Guimarães Soares Universidade Nove de Julho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.74882

Keywords:

Law on Access to Information, National Congress, Advocacy Coalition Framework.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the political process that led the changes in the Law on Access to Public Information that allowed the opening of archives of the period of exception and, consequently, served to make feasible the work of the National Truth Comission (CNV). The analysis, based on the memory and oblivion binomial, brings the clashes to this topic in the National Congress after the Constitution of 1988 until 2011, when were created the CNV and the last amendment of the Law on Access to Information. The theoretical methodological reference used was the advocacy coalition framework.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alessandra Guimarães Soares, Universidade Nove de Julho

Alessandra Guimarães Soares is a PhD in Political Science from the Federal University of São Carlos and a postdoctoral degree in Law from Universidade Nove de Julho.

Published

2017-08-31

How to Cite

Soares, A. G. (2017). Memory vs oblivion: analysis of the Law on Access to Public Information formulation process. Revista Debates, 11(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.22456/1982-5269.74882

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.