Entangled Histories – considerations about a new modality based in the relational procedures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1983-201X.42174Keywords:
Entanglement, Interlacement, Entangled Histories, Relational proceduresAbstract
This article intends to discuss one of the most recent historiographic modalities that, besides the comparative history and other historical fields as the transnational history and the connected histories, defends the proposal of deal with the ‘relational procedures’ – here understood as those ones that go beyond the traditional historiographical approaches and attempts to the historiographic gestures of comparison, entanglement, connection and overcoming of the national and civilizational limits in the choice of the historiografical subjects. The Entangled History is the modality emphasized in this article, which considers that the relational procedures – among these ones is situated the historiographic gesture of the entanglement – can be referring to the definition of the research subject, narrative ways, analytical procedures, systematic crossing of resources and other aspects of the historiographic operation.
Downloads
References
BAYLIN, B. Atlantic History: concept and contours. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
BLOCH, M. Comparaison. Bulletin du Centre International de Synthèse, n. 9, Paris, jun. 1930.
BRAUDEL, F. Gramática das Civilizações. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1989.
CANIZARES-ESGUERRA, J. Entangled Histories: Borderland Historiographies in new clothes?. American History Review, 112, n. 3, p. 787-799, 2007.
CITINO, N. J. The Global Frontier: Comparative History and the Frontier-Borderlands Approach in American Foreign Relations. Diplomatic History, 25, n. 4, p. 677-693, 2001.
COHEN, D.; O’CONNOR, M. (Orgs.). Comparison and History: History in Cross-national perspective. N. Y./London: Routledge, 2004.
COHEN, D. Comparative History: buyer beware, GHI Bulletin, n. 29, inv. 2001. [também publicado em COHEN, D.; O’CONNOR, M. (Orgs.). Comparison and History: Europe in Cross – National Perspective. New York: Routledge, 2004. p. 57-70.].
______. Introduction: Comparative History, Cross – National History, Transnational History – From Theory to Practice. In: COHEN, D.; O’CONNOR, M. (Orgs.). Comparison and History: Europe in Cross – National Perspective. New York: Routledge, 2004. p. IX-XXIII.
CONRAD, S. La constitution de 1’histoire japonaise: Histoire comparée, histoire des transferts et interactions transnationales. In: ZIMMERMANN; WERNER. Histoire Croisée. Paris: EHESS, 2003.
DASKALOV, R.; MARINOV, T. Entangled Histories of the Balkans – volume I: National Ideologies and Language Policies. Bucharest: European Research Concil/Brill, 2013.
DETIENNE, M. Comparer l’incomparable. Paris: Seuil, 2000.
GAMES, A. Atlantic History: Definitions, Challenges, and Opportunities. American Historical Review, 111, n. 3, jun. 2006, p. 741–75.
GINZBURG, C. O queijo e os vermes: o cotidiano e as ideias de um moleiro perseguido pela inquisição. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1998 [original: 1976].
GOSCHA, C.; OSTERMANN, C. Connecting Histories: Decolonization and the Cold War in Southeast Asia (1945-1962). Woodrow Wilson Center Press, 2009.
GOULD, E. H. Entangled Histories, Entangled Words: the English-Speaking Atlantic as a Spanish Periphery. American Historical Review, june 2007. p. 765-786.
GRUZINSKI, S. Os mundos misturados da monarquia católica e outras histórias conectadas. Topoi, p. 175-195, mar. 2001.
HAUPT, H-G. O lento surgimento de uma história comparada. In: BOUTIER, Jean; DOMINIQUE, Julia (Orgs.). Passados Recompostos: Campos e canteiros da História. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ/Editora FGV, 1998. p. 205-216.
HOLANDA, S. B. de. Raízes do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia Brasileira de Letras, 1998 [original: 1936].
______. Visão do Paraíso – os motivos edênicos no descobrimento e colonização do Brasil. São Paulo: Companhia Brasileira de Letras, 1995 [original: 1969].
JOHNSON, B. Engendering Nation and Race in the Borderlands. Latin American Research Review, 37, n. 1, p. 259-271, 2002.
KOCKA, J. Comparison and Beyond. In: History and Theory, n. 42, fev. 2003.
KÖSSLER, Reinhart. Entangled History and Politics: Negotiating the Past between Namíbia and Germany. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, n. 26, v. 3, p. 313-339, 2008.
LIU, Xiaoyuan. Reins of Liberation: An Entangled History of Mongolian Independence, Chinese Territoriality, and Great Power Hegemony (1911-1950). Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2006.
MAIER, C. S. La História Comparada, Studia Historica: historia contemporânea, v. X-XI, p. 11-32, 1992-1993.
MIDDELL, M. Kulturtransfer und historische Komparatistik, Thesen zu ihrem Verhãltnis [Transferência Cultural e História Comparada – teses sobre a sua relação], Comparativ, n. 10, p. 7-41, 2000.
PIRENNE, H. De La méthode comparative en histoire. In: DES MAREZ, G.; GANSHOF, F-L. (Orgs.). Compte-rendu du V Congrès des Sciences Historiques. Ghent: Weissenbrusch, 1923. p. 19-32.
RÜSEN, J. Historiografia Comparativa Intercultural. In: MALERBA, J. (Org.). A História Escrita. São Paulo: Contexto, 2006. p. 115-138.
SEEMAN, E. R.; CANIZARES-ESGUERRA, J. The Atlantic in Global History (1500-2000). Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Prentice Hall, 2007.
SEIGEL, M. Beyond Compare: Comparative Method after the Transnational Turn. Radical History Review, n. 91, p. 62-90, Winter 2005.
SUBRAHMANYAM, S. Connected Histories: Notes towards a Reconfiguration of Early Modern Eurasia. Modern Asian Studies, v. 31, n. 3, p. 735-762, jul. 1997.
______. Connected History: Explorations in Connected History – Mughals and Franks. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2004.
______. Connected History: From the Tagus to the Ganges. Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2004.
TILLY, Ch. Big Structures, Large Processes, Huge Comparisons. New York: Russell Sage Fondation, 1984.
TYRRELL, I. Making Nations/Making States: American Historians in the Context of Empire. Journal of American History, n. 86, p. 1033-1067, 1999.
WEBER, D. J. The Spanish Borderlands of North America: A Historiography. Magazine of History, n. 14, v. 4, p. 5-1, 2000.
WEBER, M. A Dominação Não-Legítima (Tipologia das Cidades). In: Economia e Sociedade. Brasília: UNB. v. II, p. 408-517, 1999. [original: post, 1925].
ZIMMERMANN, B; WERNER, M. Pensar a História Cruzada: entre empiria e reflexividade. Textos de História, v. 11, n. 1-2, p. 83-127, 2003. [original: Annales, jan./fev. 2003].
