Immediate bond strength to dentin of simplified adhesive systems

Authors

  • Fernando Freitas Portella Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Fabrício Mezzomo Collares Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Fabrício Aulo Ogliari Universidade Federal de Pelotas
  • Carmen Beatriz Borges Fortes Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul
  • Susana Maria Werner Samuel Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.45754

Keywords:

Dentin-bonding agents, Dental materials, Tensile strength

Abstract

Objetive: The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile-bond strength of four commercial adhesive systems. Methods: Twenty bovine incisors had the buccal dentin exposed and restorations were made using four different adhesive systems (n=5): Magic Bond DE and OptiBond Solo (two-step etch-and-rinse), One-Up Bond F and Adper Prompt L-Pop (one-step self-etch). Teeth were sectioned perpendicularly to the adhesive interface to obtain beams of 1mm² of section. The beams were submitted to microtensile-bond strength on a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed by one way ANOVA and Tukey post hoc at a 5% of significance. Results: The mean bond strength values were 48.81±0.56 to Magic Bond DE, 47.52±13.03 to OptiBond Solo, 44.68±13.32 to One-Up Bond F and 31.59±11.81 to Adper Prompt L-Pop. Adper Prompt L-Pop exhibited lower bond strength than etch-and-rinse adhesive systems (p<0.05). Conclusion: Adper Prompt-L-Pop showed the lower immediate bond strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fernando Freitas Portella, Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Cirurgião-dentista, Doutorando em Clínica Odontológica, Laboratório de Materiais Dentários

Fabrício Mezzomo Collares, Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutor em Odontologia, Professor Adjunto de Materiais Dentários

Fabrício Aulo Ogliari, Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Doutor em Odontologia, Professor do curso de Engenharia de Materiais da Universidade Federal de Pelotas

Carmen Beatriz Borges Fortes, Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutora em Odontologia, Professora Adjunto de Materiais Dentários

Susana Maria Werner Samuel, Laboratório de Materiais Dentários, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Doutora em Odontologia, Professora Titular de Materiais Dentários

References

BUONOCORE, M. G. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel surfaces. J Dent Res, Chicago, v. 34, n. 6, p. 849-853, Dec. 1955.

CARVALHO, R. M. et al. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials, Amsterdam, v. 26, n. 9, p. 1035-1042, Mar. 2005.

CHIARAPUTT, S. et al. Biodegradation of all-in-one self-etch adhesive systems at the resin-dentin interface. Dent Mater J, Tokyo, v. 30, n. 6, p. 814-826, Nov. 2011.

do AMARAL, R. C. et al. Bond strength and quality of the hybrid layer of one-step self-etch adhesives applied with agitation on dentin. Oper Dent, Seatle, v. 35, n. 2, p. 211-219, Mar./Apr. 2010.

FERRACANE, J. L. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic effects in dental polymer networks. Dent Mater, Copenhagen, v. 22, n. 3, p. 211-222, Mar. 2006.

FRANCESCANTONIO, M. D. et al. Bond strength evaluation of self-etch and total-etch adhesive systems on intact and ground human enamel. Braz J Oral Sci, Campinas, v. 6, n. 23, p. 1462-1466, Oct./Dec. 2007.

MARCHESI, G. et al. Influence of ageing on self-etch adhesives: one-step vs. two-step systems. Eur J Oral Sci, Copenhagen, v. 121, n. 1, p. 43-49, Feb. 2013.

NAKABAYASHI, N.; KOJIMA, K.; MASUHARA, E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mater Res, Haboken, v. 16, n. 3, p. 265-273, May 1982.

PEUMANS, M. et al. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater, Copenhagen, v. 21, n. 9, p. 864-881, Sept. 2005.

OZER, F.; BLATZ, M. B. Self-etch and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems in clinical dentistry. Compend Contin Educ Dent, Lawrenceville, v. 34, n. 1, p. 12-18, Jan. 2013.

TAY, F. R. et al. Single-step, self-etch adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization. Part I. Bond strength and morphologic evidence. Am J Dent, San Antonio, v. 17, n. 4, p. 271-278, Aug. 2004.

TAY, F. R. et al. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent, Bristol, v. 30, n. 7-8, p. 371-382, Sept./Nov. 2002.

ULKER, M. et al. Effect of artificial aging regimens on the performance of self-etching adhesives. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater, Haboken, v. 93, n. 1, p. 175-184, Apr. 2010.

VAN LANDUYT, K. L. et al. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials, Amsterdam, v. 28, n. 26, p. 3757-3785, Sept. 2007.

VAN MEERBEEK, B. et al. Technique-sensitivity of contemporary adhesives. Dent Mater J, Tokyo, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-13, Mar. 2005.

VAN MEERBEEK, B. et al. Relationship between bond-strength tests and clinical outcomes. Dent Mater, Oxford, v. 26, n. 2, p. e100-121, Fev. 2010.

VAN MEERBEEK, B. et al. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater, Oxford, v. 27, n. 1, p. 17-28, Jan. 2011.

ZANCHI, C. H. et al. Effects of long-term water storage on the microtensile bond strength of five experimental self-etching adhesives based on surfactants rather than HEMA. Clin Oral Investig., Berlin, v. 17, n. 3, p. 833-839, Aug. 2012.

Published

2018-10-15

How to Cite

Portella, F. F., Collares, F. M., Ogliari, F. A., Fortes, C. B. B., & Samuel, S. M. W. (2018). Immediate bond strength to dentin of simplified adhesive systems. Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia De Porto Alegre, 59(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.45754

Issue

Section

Original articles