Assessment of reproducibility in the identification of anatomical landmarks obtained from lateral cephalogram of dry skulls with and without metal handles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.28019Keywords:
reproducibility, cephalometry, anatomical points, imaging diagnosisAbstract
Objectives: This study evaluated cephalometric measurements from lateral chephalograms of dry skulls with and without metal points on anatomical landmarks. Materials and methods: Ten dry skulls were used for the acquisition of twenty radiographs divided into two groups: ten radiographs with metal points on anatomical landmarks (gold standard) and ten without the identifiers. A specialist in oral radiology, trained and calibrated, carried out the cephalometric analysis in both groups. Comparisons were performed using paired t-test and Bland & Altman coefficient of repeatability. Results: The results of repeatability coefficient showed statistically differences in some cephalometric measurements performed in cephalograms without the metal markers. Conclusion: An examiner, even if calibrated, is subject to errors in cephalometric measurements. Therefore, the intra-examiner calibration may not reflect certainty of accuracy but the repetition of errors.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Downloads
Published
2011-03-04
How to Cite
Arús, N. A., Vizzotto, M. B., da Silveira, P. F., Correa, L. R., da Silveira, H. L. D., & da Silveira, H. E. D. (2011). Assessment of reproducibility in the identification of anatomical landmarks obtained from lateral cephalogram of dry skulls with and without metal handles. Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia De Porto Alegre, 52(1/3), 15–17. https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.28019
Issue
Section
Original articles
License
All articles published in this journal adhere to Creative Commons License Attributions 4.0 (CC BY 4.0), and its use must be ruled by its licensed means. Authors are allowed to agree to additional and separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal, such as publishing in an institutional repository, as long as the article has a recognition of authorship and first publication in this journal.