Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: an university-based retrospective study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.130112

Keywords:

Maxillofacial prosthesis, Rehabilitation, Dentistry

Abstract

Bucomaxillofacial Prosthesis (BMFP) is a specialty of Dentistry that rehabilitates patients with loss of structure in the face region. BMFP are known to be used in the rehabilitation of patients who present deformities due to congenital, traumatic or pathological etiology. Aim: In retrospect, to assess the profile of patients, as well as the features of clinical cases of rehabilitations performed at the Buccomaxillofacial Prosthesis Extension Project, at the Faculty of Dentistry of the Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, UFRGS. Materials and methods: from August 2017 to December 2018, 90 charts were cataloged with the following data: gender, ethnicity, age, etiology of the deformity, type of rehabilitation prosthesis, how the patient came to the Project. Results: It was concluded that white male patients were the predominant group to be benefited with prosthesis. The age gap was from 5 to 81 years. Ocular prosthesis was the most prevalent one. The pathological etiology was the one that most required rehabilitation treatment. Doctors and hospital staff were the ones who most referred patients to the Project. Discussion: The prevalence of patients attended was male, pathological etiology, aged 60 years or more, which reinforces the survival of people who are diagnosed with cancer and need oral and maxillofacial rehabilitation. Conclusion: The great demand for care in the BMFP Extension Project shows a lack of this service and little research to clarify the profile of the patient who most seeks BMFP care.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Fernada Putz Pereira

Cirurgiã-dentista graduada pela Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.

Jonas de Almeida Rodrigues, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL, FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIA

Professor associado da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Jefferson Tomio Sanada, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL, FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIA

Professor associado do departamento de Odontologia Conservadora da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

Adriana Corsetti, UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL, FACULDADE DE ODONTOLOGIA

Professora adjunta da Faculdade de Odontologia da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil

References

Graziani M. Prótese maxilo-facial. 3. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara Koogan; 1982.

Simões FG, Reis RB. A especialidade de prótese bucomaxilofacial e sua atuação na odontologia. Rev Sul-Bras Odontol. 2009 Set;6(3):327-31.

Dias RB, Cardim RH, Pereira SL, Antoniazzi TF, Coto NP. O uso de implantes osseointegrados na reabilitação facial. Rev Paran Perio/Impl. 2005;2:15-20.

Cardim RH. Alterações cromáticas de silicones utilizados na confecção de próteses faciais após envelhecimento [Mestrado em odontologia com ênfase em Prótese Bucomaxilofacial]. São Paulo: Faculdade de Odontologia da USP; 2007.

Rezende JRV. Prótese bucomaxilofacial. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1997.

Cardoso MSO, Araújo PG, Cardoso AJ, Cardoso SM, Moraes LC. Implicações psicossociais em pacientes com perda do globo ocular. Rev Cir Traumatol Buco-maxilo-fac. 2007;7(1):79-84.

Dings JPJ, Merloc MAW, Maclennan-NAphausen MTP, Pol PV, Maal TJJ, Meijei GJ. Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: a survey on the quality of life. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2018. Nov;120(5):780–6.

Chrcanovic BR, Nilsson J, Thor A. Survival and complications of implants to support craniofacial prosthesis: a systematic review. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. 2016;44(10):1536-52.

Hatamiki M, Abbariki M, Alguudah N, Cook AE. Survey of ocular prothestics rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, Part 1: anophthalmic patientsáetiology, opinions, and attitudes. J Craniofac Surg. 2017 Jul;28(5):1293-6.

Koch KR, Trester W, Muller -Uri N, Trester M, Cursiefen C, Heindl LM. Augenprothetische versorgung: anpassung, handhabung und komplikationen. DerOphthalmologe. 2016 Feb;2.

Modugno A, Mantelli F, Sposato S, Moretti C, Lambiase A, Bonini S. Ocular prostheses in the last century: a retrospective analysis of 8018 patients. Eye (Lond). 2013;27(7):865–70.

Pulido EG, Gonzalez JS, Sarduy RR. Necesidad de protesis buco-maxilofacial en el municipio Matanzas en el año 1999. Rev Cubana Estomatol.2004;41(1).

Moroni P. Reabilitação e prótese bucofacial: cirurgia e prótese. 1. ed. São Paulo: Panamd; 1982.

Alvarenga lM, Ruiz MT, Bertelli-pavarino EC, Ruback MJC, Maniglia JV, Goloni-bertollo EM. Avaliação epidemiológica de pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço em um hospital universitário do noroeste do estado de São Paulo. Rev Bras Otorrinolaringol. 2008;74(1):68-73.

Walker DM, Boey G, Mcdonald LA. The pathology of oral cancer. Pathology. 2003;35:376-83.

Wunsch V. Epidemiologia do câncer de laringe no Brasil. Med J. 2004;122:188-94.

Montgomery PC, Kiat-amnuay S. Survey of currently used materials for fabrication of extraoral maxillofacial prostheses in North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia. J Prosthodont. 2010;19:482-90.

Silva FA, Roussenq SC, Tavares MGS, Souza CPF, Mozzini CB, Benetti M, et al. Perfil Epidemiológico dos pacientes com câncer de cabeça e pescoço em um centro oncológico no Sul do Brasil. Rev Bras Cancerol. 2020;66(1):e-08455.

Araújo Filho RC, Cardoso MS, Cardoso AJ, Pereira JR, Souza EH, Macedo CB. Fatores etiológicos das mutilações bucomaxilofaciais em pacientes atendidos no serviço de prótese buco da FOP/UPE. Odontol Clín-cient. 2006;5(3):203-86.

Goiato MC, Mancuso DN, Fernandes AUR, Dekon SFC. Estudo sobre as causas mais frequentes de perdas oculares. Arq Odontol. 2004;40(3):207-86

Araújo CR, Meyer GA, Souza IA. Prevalência de próteses bucomaxilofaciais na Faculdade de Odontologia da Escola Bahiana de Medicina e Saúde Pública em Salvador, Bahia. Rev portuguesa de estomatologia, medicina dentária e cirurgia maxilofacial. 2009;50(3):133-39.

Hatamleh MM, Alnazzawi AA, Abbariki M, Alqudah N, Cook AE. Survey of ocular prosthetics rehabilitation in the United Kingdom, part 2: anophthalmic patients’satisfaction and acceptance. J Craniofac Surg. 2017;28(5):1297-301.

Becker C, Becker AM, Pfeiffer J. Health-related quality of life in patients with nasal prosthesis. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2016;44(1):75–9.

Brandão TB, Vechiato AJF, Batista VES, Ribeiro ACP, Nary HF, Chilvarquer I, et al. Assessment of treatment outcomes for facial prostheses in patients with craniofacial defects: a pilot retrospective study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2017;118(2):235–41.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-10

How to Cite

Putz Pereira, F., de Carvalho, I. M., de Almeida Rodrigues, J. ., Tomio Sanada, J., & Corsetti, A. (2023). Maxillofacial prosthetic rehabilitation: an university-based retrospective study. Revista Da Faculdade De Odontologia De Porto Alegre, 64, e130112. https://doi.org/10.22456/2177-0018.130112

Issue

Vol. 64 (2023)

Section

Original articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Fernada Putz Pereira, Isadora Mello de Carvalho, Jonas de Almeida Rodrigues, Jefferson Tomio Sanada, Adriana Corsetti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

All articles published in this journal adhere to Creative Commons License Attributions 4.0 (CC BY 4.0), and its use must be ruled by its licensed means. Authors are allowed to agree to additional and separate contracts for the non-exclusive distribution of the article published in this journal, such as publishing in an institutional repository, as long as the article has a recognition of authorship and first publication in this journal.