The mishaps of US foreign policy towards Asia: a neoclassical realist analysis of Asia Pivot under Barack Obama (2009-2016)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.101607Keywords:
Pivot to Asia, Neoclassical Realism, USA, International Security,Abstract
The objective of this article is to analyse the “Asia Pivot” US policy during Barack Obama’s government (2008-2016) through the lenses of Neoclassical Realism. With that in mind, this article analyses the leadership perceptions regarding threats and opportunities in East Asia, as well as domestic pressures that influenced the development, implementation and actions of the policy during the Obama administration. The article also analyses how the Asia Pivot policy affected the East Asian countries’ perception regarding US commitment with the region. From the methodology point of view, the article follows a qualitative approach, based in primary and secondary sources as the base of the research arguments. The article concludes that US budget problems, the rise of new leaderships against US expenditure and security actions in other countries, as well as issues involving the US internal power balance, affected in a negative way the Pivot policy. As the policy developed, doubts regarding US willingness and capacity to act in East Asia affected the perception of countries in the region, fuelling militarization processes and security dilemmas in the Asian theater.
Downloads
References
BADER, Jeffrey. Obama and China's Rise: An Insider's Account of America's Asia Strategy. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2013.
BANCO MUNDIAL. World Bank database, 2020. Disponível em: https://data.worldbank.org/ Acesso em 10 de janeiro de 2020.
BITZINGER, Richard A.; RASKA, Michael. RSIS Policy Brief: The AirSea Battle Debate and the Future of Conflict in East Asia. S. Rajaratram School of International Studies, Graduate School of Nanyang Technological University, 2013. Disponível em: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/160037/RSIS_Air%20Sea%20Battle_190213%20v1_Print.pdf Acesso em 10 de setembro de 2020.
BRANDS, Hal; FEAVER, Peter. Stress-Testing American Grand Strategy. Survival, v. 58, n. 6, p. 93-120, 2016.
BRANDS, Hal. Barack Obama and the Dilemmas of American Grand Strategy. The Washington Quarterly, v. 39, n. 4, p. 101–125, 2017.
BROOKS, Stephen; WOHLFORTH, William. The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers in the Twenty-First Century. China’s Rise and the Fate of America’s Global Position. International Security, v. 40, n. 3, p. 7–53 (online), 2016.
CAMPBELL, Kurt. The Pivot. The Future of American Statecraft in Asia. New York: Twelve Hachette Book Group. First Edition, 2016.
CHRISTENSEN, Thomas. Useful Adversaries: Grand Strategy, Domestic Mobilization, and Sino-American Conflict, 1947– 1958. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1996.
CHRISTENSEN, Thomas. The China Challenge. Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. W. W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2015.
CLINTON, Hilary. America’s Pacific Century. Foreign Affairs, 2011. Disponível em: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/ Acesso em 17 de outubro de 2018.
CLINTON, Hilary. Clinton: 'a strong America is welcoming new powers into an international system'. Atlantic Council, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/natosource/clinton-a-strong-america-is-welcoming-new-powers-into-an-international-system Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2018.
CORDESMAN, Anthony H.; HESS, Ashley. The Evolving Military Balance in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia. Center for Strategic and International Studies, 2013.
DANIELS, Samus; HARRISON, Todd. What Does the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2019 Mean for Defense? CSIS, 2019. Disponível em https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-does-bipartisan-budget-act-2019-mean-defense Acesso em 10 de junho de 2020.
ECONOMY, Elizabeth; SEGAL, Adam. The G-2 Mirage: Why the United States and China Are Not Ready to Upgrade Ties. Foreign Affairs, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/east-asia/2009-05-01/g-2-mirage Acesso em 10 de setembro de 2020.
FORD, John. The Pivot to Asia Was Obama’s Biggest Mistake. The Diplomat, 2017. Disponível em: https://thediplomat.com/2017/01/the-pivot-to-asia-was-obamas-biggest-mistake/ Acesso em 12 de outubro de 2018.
GREEN, Michael J. By More than Providence: Grand Strategy and American Power in the Asia – Pacific Since 1783, NY: Columbia University Press, 2017.
GREEN, Michael J. et al. Power and Order in Asia. A Survey of Regional Expectations. CSIS Report. ROWMAN & LITTLEFIELD, 2014.
HAROLD, Scott W. Is the Pivot Doomed? The Resilience of America’s Strategic ‘Rebalance’. The Washington Quarterly, p.85-99, 2015.
HEGINBOTHAM, Eric. The China-US Military Scorecard: forces, geography, and the evolving balance of power, 1996-2017. California, Santa Mônica: Rand Corporation, 2018.
HUGHES, Christopher. Japan's Grand Strategic Shift. From the Yoshida Doctrine to an Abe Doctrine? In: TELLIS, Ashley et al. Power, ideas, and military strategy in the Asia-Pacific. p.73-105. Strategic Asia 2017–18, , 2017.
KOLMAS, Michal; KOLMASOVA, Sarka. A ‘pivot’ that never existed: America’s Asian strategy under Obama and Trump. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, v. 32, n. 1, 2019.
KUO, Mercy. Trump and the TAIPEI Act. The Diplomat, 2020. Disponível em: https://thediplomat.com/2020/04/trump-and-the-taipei-act/. Acesso em 10 de junho de 2020.
LIND, Jennifer. The Art of the Bluff: The US-Japan Alliance Under the Trump Administration: JERVIS, Robert. Chaos in the Liberal Order: The Trump Presidency and International Politics in the Twenty–First Century, 1rst ed. Robert Jervis et al. New York, NY: Columbia University, 2018.
MASTERS, Jonathan. U.S. Debt Ceiling: Costs and Consequences. Council of Foreign Relations, 2019. Disponível em https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/us-debt-ceiling-costs-and-consequences Acesso em 10 de junho de 2020.
NSS. National Security Strategy. The White House, Washington, 2010. Disponível em: http://nssarchive.us/NSSR/2010.pdf Acesso em 14 de abril de 2017.
NSS. National Security Strategy. The White House, Washington, 2015. Disponível em: http://nssarchive.us/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/2015.pdf Acesso em 15 de abril de 2017.
OBAMA, Barack. Renewing American Leadership. Foreign Affairs, 2007. Disponível em: https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2007-07-01/renewing-american-leadership Acesso em 10 de janeiro de 2017.
OBAMA, Barack. Remarks By President Obama to the Australian Parliament. The White House, 2011. Disponível em: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2011/11/17/remarks-president-obama-australian-parliament Acesso em 18 de janeiro de 2017.
NOGUEIRA, Isabela; HENDLER, Bruno. O Sudeste Asiático entre Estados Unidos e China: “arquipélago de economias de mercado” ou palco da competição interestatal capitalista?. Carta Internacional, v.11, n.3, p. 199-222, 2016.
OLIVEIRA, Alana. Entre o Sol, a Águia e o Dragão: dinâmicas de poder e segurança entre Japão, EUA e China no Leste Asiático e o estudo de caso das ilhas Senkaku/Diaoyu no século XXI. PhD Thesis, UFRJ, 2019.
OLIVEIRA, Alana C. G; FERNANDES, Felipe G. C. O Raiar do Sol no Sudeste Asiático: A Projeção Japonesa no Mar do Sul da China e Seus Interesses Estratégicos. Revista da Escola de Guerra Naval, v. 25, n. 2, 2019, p. 449-491.
PECEQUILO, Cristina S. A política externa dos Estados Unidos. Rio Grande do Sul: UFRGS Editora, 2003.
PECEQUILO, Cristina S. As Grandes Estratégias dos Estados Unidos (1989/2010). Meridiano 47, 2010. Disponível em: http://www.ibri-rbpi.org/?p=2575 Acesso em 10 de janeiro de 2018.
PEW RESEARCH CENTER. Global Publics Back U.S. on Fighting ISIS, but Are Critical of Post-9/11 Torture. Pew Research Center, 2015. Disponível em: https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2015/06/23/global-publics-back-u-s-on-fighting-isis-but-are-critical-of-post-911-torture/ Acesso em 10 de agosto de 2019.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROGRAM. Majority of Americans are Willing to Make Defense Cuts, New Survey Finds. Public Consultation.org, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.publicconsultation.org/federal-budget/majority-of-americans-are-willing-to-make-defense-cuts-new-survey-finds/ Acesso em 10 de janeiro de 2019.
PUBLIC CONSULTATION PROGRAM. Americans Not Sold on Defense Increase. Public Consultation.org, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.publicconsultation.org/defense-budget/americans-not-sold-on-defense-increase/ Acesso em 19 de janeiro de 2019.
REUTERS. Senior Chinese diplomat says China, U.S. must avoid Cold War mentality. Reuters, 2018. Disponível em: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-china/senior-chinese-diplomat-says-china-u-s-must-avoid-cold-war-mentality-idUSKCN1M607M Acesso em 5 de abril de 2019.
RIPSMAN, Norrin M.; TALIAFERRO, Jeffrey W.; LOBELL, Steven E. Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 1st Edition, 2016.
ROSE, Gideon. Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy. World Politics, v. 51, n. 1, p.145-177, 1998.
ROSS, Robert. The Problem with the Pivot. Foreign Affairs, v. 91, n. 6, p. 70-82, 2012.
SCHWELLER, Randall L. Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler's Strategy of World Conquest. NY: Columbia University Press, 1998.
SCHWELLER, Randall L. Opposite but Compatible Nationalisms: A Neoclassical Realist Approach to the Future of US–China Relations. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, v. 11, n. 1, p. 23–48, 2018.
SLOAN, Stanley R. Donald Trump and NATO: Historic Alliance Meets A-historic President. In: JERVIS, Robert. Chaos in the Liberal Order: the Trump Presidency and International Politics in the 21st Century. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, 2018.
US-CHINA JOINT STATEMENT. U.S.-China Joint Statement. The White House, 2009. Disponível em: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/realitycheck/the-press-office/us-china-joint-statement Acesso em 14 de janeiro de 2018.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. The New World Order. Millennium. Journal of International Studies, v. 22, n. 2, p.187-195, 1993.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. Structural Realism after the Cold War.
International Security, v. 25, n. 1, p. 5–41, 2000.
WALTZ, Kenneth N. Theory of International Politics. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1979.
WOHLFORTH, Williams C. The Stability of a Unipolar World. International Security, v. 24, n. 1, p. 5–41, 1999.
ZAKARIA, Fareed. From Wealth to Power: The Unusual Origins of America’s World Role, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1998
ZHAO, Suisheng. China’s Power from a Chinese Perspective (I): A Developing Country versus a Great Power. In: CHUNG, Jae-ho. Assessing China’s Power. p.251-270, The Asan Institute, UK: Palgrave Macmillian, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which allows its use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, as well as its transformation and creations from it, as long as the original author and source are credited. Also, the material cannot be used for commercial purposes, and if it is transformed, or used as a basis for other creations, these must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed to deposit, in the repositories accepted by Conjuntura Austral, the preprint version of the manuscripts submitted to the journal prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
d. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute online (in institutional and /or thematic repositories, on their personal pages, etc.) the postprint version of the manuscripts (accepted and published), without an embargo period.
e. Conjuntura Austral: Journal of the Global South, imbued with the spirit of ensuring the protection of regional academic and scientific production in Open Access, is a signatory to the Mexico Declaration on the use of the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license to guarantee the protection of academic and scientific production in open access.
