The new Latin American neo-patriotic far-right: reactionary internationalism and its challenge to the international liberal order
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.106956Keywords:
Far right, International order, Crisis of globalisation, Reactionary internationalism.Abstract
This work argues that the new far-right, which we characterise as neo-patriotic, emerges through a combination of agency and structural factors amid a crisis of globalisation, understanding it as a crisis in the hegemonic order. The crisis of globalisation opens opportunities for the rise of a new far-right which redefines the popular, the national, and the international based on Schmittian friend-enemy distinctions, as an autonomous categorisation, which gives political meaning to their identity as a political actor. A key element of this identity is a reactionary internationalism based on the defence of tradition against cosmopolitan globalism. Thus, the reinstatement of a traditionalist “Arcadia” gives meaning to the process of re-politization and challenges to the liberal international order, its national, regional, and global dimensions, universalist and globalist discourse, and its teleologies of progress. In sum, these actors do not merely question globalisation as an established order but fight for the construction of an alternative international order of a reactionary type.Downloads
References
ACTIS, Esteban. La visión del mundo de Jair Bolsonaro. De la periferia perimida a la periferia tradicionalista. Foreign Affairs Latinoamérica, v.19, n.1, p. 51-57, 2019.
ACUÑA, Carlos; CHUDNOVSKY, Mariana. Cómo entender las instituciones y su relación con la política: lo bueno, lo malo y lo feo de las instituciones y los institucionalismos. In: ACUÑA, Carlos (Comp.). ¿Cuánto importan las instituciones? Gobierno, Estado y actores en la política argentina. Buenos Aires: Siglo Veintiuno, 2013, p. 13-67.
ALEXANDER, Jeffrey. Vociferando contra o iluminismo: a ideologia de Steve Bannon. Sociologia & Antropologia, v.8, n.3, p. 1009-1023, 2018.
ANDERSON, Benedict. Imagined Communities. London/New York: Verso, 1991.
ASLANIDIS, Paris. Is populism an ideology? A refutation and a new perspective. Political Studies, v.64, n.1_suppl, p. 88-104, 2015.
BALFOUR, Rosa; FIESCHI, Catherine; GRABBE, Heather; HILL, Christopher; LOCHOCKI, Timo; MENDRAS, Marie; MUDDE, Cas; NIEMI, Mari; SCHMIDT, Juliane; STRATULAT, Corina. Europe’s Troublemakers: The Populist Challenge to Foreign Policy. Bruselas: European Policy Centre, 2016. Available at: http://www.epc.eu/pub_details.php?cat_id=17&pub_id=6377.
BELÉM LOPES, Dawisson; CARVALHO, Thales. Política externa ou campanha eleitoral por outros meios? O Globo. Rio de Janeiro, 26 de junio, 2020. Disponible en: https://oglobo.globo.com/mundo/artigo-politica-externa-ou-campanha-eleitoral-por-outros-meios-24500664 Acceso en 20 de agosto de 2020.
CAPOCCIA, Giovanni; KELEMEN, Daniel. The Study of Critical Junctures: Theory, Narrative and Counterfactuals in Institutional Theory. World Politics, v. 59, p. 341-369, 2007.
CASARÕES, Guilherme. Política externa sob Bolsonaro e Ernesto Araújo inaugura a diplomacia populista. Folha de São Paulo, São Paulo, 22 de abril, 2020. Diponible em: https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/mundo/2020/04/politica-externa-sob-bolonaro-e-ernesto-araujo-inaugura-a-diplomacia-populista.shtml?fbclid=IwAR22FZnDjRvNpQzckJNuTnfbaZwv-ehbl2u1Dw4KjSP8JlOBCvQyGm7jFmI Acceso en 20 de agosto de 2020
CHRYSSOGELOS, Angelos. Populism in Foreign Policy. In THIES, Cameron (Ed.). Oxford Encyclopedia of Foreign Policy Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2018, available at: https://oxfordre.com/politics/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228637-e-467
COLLIER, Ruth; COLLIER, David. Shaping the Political Arena: Critical Junctures, the Labor Movement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991.
COP, Burak; ZIHNIOĞLU, Özge. Turkish foreign policy under AKP rule: Making sense of the turbulence. Political Studies Review, v.15, n.1, p. 28-38, 2015.
COX, Robert. Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond International Re-lations Theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, v.10, n.2, p. 126-155, 1981.
DESTRADI, Sandra; PLAGEMANN, Johannes. Populism and International Relations: (Un)Predictability, Personalisation, and the Reinforcement of Existing Trends in World Politics. Review of International Studies, v.45, n.5, p. 711-730, 2019.
DREZNER, Daniel. The angry populist as foreign policy leader: Real change or just hot air? The Fletcher Forum for World Affairs, v.41, n.2, p. 23-43, 2017.
EN ÓRBITA. Para Brasil, “el cambio climático es una estrategia del marxismo cultural para dominar la economía global”. Sputnik, 20 de setiembre, 2019. Disponible en: https://mundo.sputniknews.com/radio_en_orbita/201909201088734765-para-brasil-el-cambio-climatico-es-una-estrategia-del-marxismo-cultural-para-dominar-la-economia/ Acceso en 20 de agosto de 2020.
GARCÉ, Adolfo. Ideas y cambio institucional: tupamaros versus comunistas (Uruguay, 1985-2010). Tesis de Doctorado en Ciencia Política. Universidad de la República, Uruguay, 2012, 374p.
GREENER, Ian. The Potential of Path Dependence in Political Studies. Politics, v.25, n.1, p. 62-72, 2005.
GUIMARÃES, Feliciano de Sá; OLIVEIRA e SILVA, Irma Dutra de. Far-Right Populism and Foreign Policy Identity: Jair Bolsonaro’s ultra-conservatism and the new politics of alignment. International Affairs, forthcoming, 2020.
HOOGHE, Liesbet; LENZ, Tobias; MARKS, Gary. Contested world order: The delegitimation of international governance. The Review of International Organizations, v.14, p. 731-743, 2019.
IKENBERRY, John. The End of the Liberal International Order. International Affairs, v.24, n.1, p. 7-23, 2018.
INGLEHART, Ronald; NORRIS, Pippa. Trump, Brexit and the rise of Populism. Economic Have-nots and Cultural Backlash. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School Faculty Research Working Papers RWP 16-026, 2016. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2818659
KRIESI, Hanspeter; GRANDE, Edgar; DOLEZAL, Martin; HELBLING, Marc; HÖGLINGER, Dominic; HUTTE, Swen; WÜEST, Bruno. Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.
LIANG, Christina. Europe for the Europeans: the foreign and security policy of the populist radical right. In: LIANG, Christina (Ed.). Europe for the Europeans: The Foreign and Security Policy of the Populist Radical Right. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007, p. 1-32.
MAHONEY, James. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society, v.29, .4. p. 507-548, 2000.
MOFFITT, Benjamin. The Global Rise of Populism: Performance, Political Style, and Representation. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2016.
MUDDE, Cas. Europe’s populist surge: a long time in the making. Foreign Affairs, v.95, n.6, p. 25-30, 2016.
MUDDE, Cas. The Populist Zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, v.39, p. 541-563, 2004.
MÜLLER, Jan. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2016.
NORRIS, Pippa; INGLEHART, Ronald. Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2019.
ÖZPEK, Burak; YAŞAR, Nebahat. Populism and foreign policy in Turkey under the AKP rule. Turkish Studies, v.19, n.2, p. 198-216, 2018.
PLAGEMANN, Johannes; DESTRADI, Sandra. Populism and foreign policy: the case of India. Foreign Policy Analysis, v.15, n.2, p. 283–301, 2019.
REDACCION 180. Manini habló de “cipayismo apátrida” al pedir restablecer la Ley de Caducidad. Cientochenta. Montevideo, 5 de agosto, 2020. Disponible en: https://www.180.com.uy/articulo/83631_manini-hablo-de-cipayismo-apatrida-al-pedir-restablecer-la-ley-de-caducidad Acceso en 20 de agosto de 2020.
RODRIGUES, Gilberto. ¿El Trump del trópico? Política exterior de ultraderecha en Brasil. Análisis Carolina 6. Madrid: Fundación Carolina, 2019.
SANAHUJA, José Antonio. Posglobalización y ascenso de la extrema derecha: crisis de hegemonía y riesgos sistémicos. In: MESA, Manuela (Coord.). Seguridad internacional y democracia: guerras, militarización y fronteras. Anuario CEIPAZ 2016-17. Madrid: CEIPAZ, 2017, p. 35-71.
SANAHUJA, José Antonio. Hegemonía, crisis de globalización y Relaciones Internacionales. Concepciones clásicas y teorización crítica. In GONZÁLEZ, Paloma (ed.) El sistema internacional del siglo XXI. Dinámicas, actores y relaciones internacionales. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch, 2020, p. 27-59 (en prensa)
SCHMITT, Carl. El Concepto de lo político. Madrid: Alianza Editorial, [1932] 1991.
TEITELBAUM, Benjamin. War for eternity: inside Bannon’s far-right circle of global power brokers. New York : Dey St. Books, 2020.
VERBEEK, Bertjan; ZASLOVE, Andrej. Populism and Foreign Policy. In ROVIRA, Cristobal; TAGGART, Paul; OCHOA, Paulina; OSTIGUY, Pierre (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017, p. 384-405.
VERBEEK, Bertjan; ZASLOVE, Andrej. The impact of populist radical right parties on foreign policy: the northern league as a junior coalition partner in the Berlusconi governments. European Political Science Review, v.7, n.4, p. 525-546, 2015.
WEHNER, Leslie; THIES, Cameron. The Nexus of Populism and Foreign Policy: The Case of Latin America. International Relations, 2020, doi:10.1177/0047117820944430.
WEYLAND, Kurt. Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, v.34, n.1, p. 1-22, 2001.
WIENER, Antje. A Theory of Contestation. A Concise Summary of Its Argument and Concepts. Polity, v.49, n.1, p. 109-125, 2017.
ZÜRN, Michael. The politicization of world politics and its effects: Eight propositions. European Political Science Review, v. 6, n.1, p. 47-71, 2014.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
a. Authors retain the copyright and grant the journal the right to first publication, with the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License, which allows its use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, as well as its transformation and creations from it, as long as the original author and source are credited. Also, the material cannot be used for commercial purposes, and if it is transformed, or used as a basis for other creations, these must be distributed under the same license as the original.
b. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
c. Authors are allowed to deposit, in the repositories accepted by Conjuntura Austral, the preprint version of the manuscripts submitted to the journal prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
d. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish and distribute online (in institutional and /or thematic repositories, on their personal pages, etc.) the postprint version of the manuscripts (accepted and published), without an embargo period.
e. Conjuntura Austral: Journal of the Global South, imbued with the spirit of ensuring the protection of regional academic and scientific production in Open Access, is a signatory to the Mexico Declaration on the use of the Creative Commons BY-NC-SA license to guarantee the protection of academic and scientific production in open access.
Accepted 2020-09-16
Published 2020-09-30


