STRUCTURALISM AND NEOSTRUCTURALISM: OLD QUESTIONS, NEW CHALLENGES

Authors

  • Fabrício J. Missio Professor de Economia da UEMS, Doutorando em economia pelo Cedeplar e bolsista Fundect.
    • Frederico Gonzaga Jayme Junior Professor Associado do Cedeplar/UFMG e bolsista do Cnpq.

      DOI:

      https://doi.org/10.22456/2176-5456.20124

      Keywords:

      Structuralism, Neo-structuralism, Competitiveness, Growth

      Abstract

      The goal of this paper is to resume the Latin American structuralist approach from the neo-structuralism approach to delineate an analytical framework able to aggregate the main foundations and establish a theoretical core that articulates its main concept. We recover the main arguments for the decline of the structuralist approach, and a parallel is established between the predecessor neo-structuralism with structuralism and neoliberalism. Next, we present the definition of an analytic framework with key fundamentals. Focused on the concept of systemic competitiveness and virtuous cycle, neo-structuralism define a strategy to achieve the "high road" of globalization. Conclusions highlight that this approach considers the process of globalization as inevitable, but that her engagement is conditional on the policy.

      Downloads

      Download data is not yet available.

      Published

      2012-05-01

      How to Cite

      Missio, F. J., & Jayme Junior, F. G. (2012). STRUCTURALISM AND NEOSTRUCTURALISM: OLD QUESTIONS, NEW CHALLENGES. Análise Econômica, 30(57). https://doi.org/10.22456/2176-5456.20124