Electroretinography in Wild Canids (Lycalopex gymnocercus and Cerdocyon thous) - Anesthetic Quality of a Multimodal Protocol

Authors

  • Luiza Tonietto Mangini University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Jean Carlos Gasparotto University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Anita Marchionatti Pigatto São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0521-7984
  • Guilherme Rech Cassanego São Paulo State University (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
  • Beatriz Perez Floriano University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3866-1886
  • Júlia Odorissi Oliveira University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2342-7865
  • Francini Arboit University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Luís Felipe Dutra Corrêa University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.
  • Gabrielle Coelho Freitas University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Santa Maria, RS, Brazil. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3586-7291
  • André Vasconcelos Soares Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.150176

Keywords:

ketamine, dexmedetomidine, electroretinography, ERG, wild canid, midazolam

Abstract

Background: Ophthalmic parameters and diseases affecting wild animals remain poorly investigated, and electroretinography (ERG) stands out as an objective and non-invasive tool for assessing retinal function. However, its application in wild mammals relies on the use of safe and effective anesthetic protocols. The aim of this study was to evaluate the duration and anesthetic quality of the protocol employed for ERG, as well as its potential interferences with the examination and possible complications for the patient.
Cases: Nine cases of wild canids housed at the Municipal Zoo of Cachoeira do Sul were reported, in which animals were sedated for electroretinography (ERG). The intended anesthetic protocol consisted of an intramuscular (IM) combination of ketamine (8 mg·kg-¹), dexmedetomidine (3 μg·kg-¹), and midazolam (0.5 mg·kg-¹). When anesthesia was deemed superficial, rescue was performed with intravenous administration of propofol (1 mg·kg-¹) over 1 min, followed by a continuous rate infusion (CRI) at 0.1–0.3 mg·kg-¹·h-¹, in order to maintain immobility without ocular globe rotation until completion of the procedure. Parameters monitored every 5 min included heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (ƒ), electrocardiogram (ECG), rectal temperature (TR°C), oxygen saturation of hemoglobin (SpO2), systolic arterial pressure (SAP), diastolic arterial pressure (DAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and sedation score. At the end of the procedure, dexmedetomidine and midazolam were antagonized with intravenous atipamezole (9 μg·kg-¹) and flumazenil (0.01 mg·kg-¹), respectively.
Discussion: In this study, the estimated body weight was close to the actual weight of the patients, preventing pharmacological underdosing or overdosing. Given the irascible behavior of the animals and the lack of facilities for general anesthesia, dissociative anesthesia was chosen. Fisher’s exact test revealed no significant association between whether the administered dose was higher or lower than estimated and sedation duration longer than 30 min. The mean propofol infusion rate required to maintain an adequate anesthetic plane was 0.23 mg·kg-¹·h-¹, and only 2 animals required ocular positioning adjustments after the onset of propofol infusion. Among the monitored parameters, only rectal temperature (°C) showed statistical significance, decreasing over time as a result of propofol administration. Electrocardiographic changes were observed in 4 animals; however, no interventions were necessary, as no concurrent alterations in oxygen saturation or arterial blood pressure were detected.
Keywords: ketamine, dexmedetomidine, electroretinography, ERG, wild canid, midazolam.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1 Arnemo J.M., Ahlqvist P., Andersen R., Berntsen F., Ericsson G., Odden J., Brunberg S., Segerström P. &

Swenson J.E. 2006. Risk of capture-related mortality in large free-ranging mammals: Experiences from Scandinavia. Wildlife Biology. 12(1): 109-113. DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[109:ROCMIL]2.0.CO;2

2 Bodey A.R. & Sansom J. 1998. Epidemiological study of blood pressure in domestic cats. Journal of Small Animal Practice. 39(12): 567-573. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-5827.1998.tb03710.x

3 Congdon J.M., Marquez M., Niyom S. & Boscan P. 2011. Evaluation of the sedative and cardiovascular effects of intramuscular administration of dexmedetomidine with and without concurrent atropine administration in dogs. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 239(1): 81-89. DOI: 10.2460/javma239.1.81

4 Cuniberti B., Huuskonen V. & Hughes J.L.M. 2023. Comparison between continuous rate infusion and target-controlled infusion of propofol in dogs: a randomized clinical trial. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 50(1): 21-30. DOI: 10.1016/j.vaa.2021.08.048

5 Jorge R.S.P. & Jorge M.L.S.P. 2014. Carnivora – Canidae (Cachorro-do-mato, Cachorro-vinagre, Loboguará e Raposa-do-campo). In: Cubas Z.S., Silva J.C.R. & Catão-Dias J.L. (Eds). Tratado de Animais Selvagens. 2.ed. São Paulo: Roca, pp.848-851.

6 Kern T.J. 2021. Exotic Animal Ophthalmology. In: Gelat K.N., Bem-Shlomo G., Gilger B.C., Hendrix D.V.H., Kern T.J. & Plummer C.E. (Eds). Veterinary Ophthalmology. 6th edn. New York: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.2217-2224

7 Kuusela E., Vainio O., Short C.E., Leppäluoto J., Huttunen P., Ström S., Huju V., Valtonen A. & Raekallio M. 2003. A comparison of propofol infusion and propofol/isoflurane anaesthesia in dexmedetomidine premedicated dogs. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 26(3): 199-204. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2885.2003.00465.x

8 Lin S.L., Shiu W.C., Liu P.C., Cheng F.P., Lin Y.C. & Wang W.S. 2009. The effects of different anesthetic agents on short electroretinography protocol in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 71(6): 763-768. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.71.763

9 Mishina M., Watanabe T., Matsuoka S., Shibata K., Fujii K., Maeda H. & Wakao Y. 1999. Diurnal variations of blood pressure in dogs. Journal of Veterinary Medical Science. 61(6): 643-647. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.61.643

10 Ribeiro V.R.F., Ramos A.F., Alfonso A., Hippolito A.G., Lima H.C., Codognoto V.M., Silva D.C.S., Tsunemi M.H., L. Neto M., Melcher A., Okamoto P.T.C.G., Machado L.H.A. & Lourenço M.L.G. 2022. Normal echocardiographic and radiographic reference values for crab-eating fox (Cerdocyon thous) anesthetized with ketamine and midazolam. Veterinary Research Communications. (46): 961-965. DOI: 10.1007/s11259-022-09892-w

11 Ruas J.L., Farias N.A.R., Soares M.P. & Brum J.G.W. 2003. Babesia sp. em graxaim-do-campo (Lycalopex

gymnocercus) no sul do Brasil. Arquivos do Instituto Biológico (São Paulo). 70(1): 113-114. DOI: 10.1590/1808-1657v70p1132003

12 Silva D.C.S. 2017. Avaliação cardíaca e da condição corporal em cachorro-do-mato (Cerdocyon thous – LINNAEUS, 1766). 72f. Botucatu, SP. Dissertação (Mestrado em Animais Selvagens) - Programa de Pós-Graduação em Animais Selvagens, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”.

Additional Files

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Tonietto Mangini , L., Gasparotto , J. C., Marchionatti Pigatto , A., Rech Cassanego , G., Perez Floriano , B., Odorissi Oliveira , J., … Vasconcelos Soares, A. (2026). Electroretinography in Wild Canids (Lycalopex gymnocercus and Cerdocyon thous) - Anesthetic Quality of a Multimodal Protocol. Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 54. https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.150176

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.