SARS-CoV-2 in Horses in the Thrace Region of Turkey
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.141369Keywords:
Covid-19, cohort study, horse, SARS-CoV-2, seropositivity, zooanthropozoonosisAbstract
Background: People spent more time at home as part of the precaution taken after the COVID-19 pandemic. In this stage, human beings began to own more pets and spend more time with them. One of the most significant questions during this period was whether COVID-19 could be transmitted to pets. Beta coronavirus was already known in the veterinary field to cause diseases with different pathogenicity in many animal species. Over time, research has shown that the disease can be transmitted to pets and wild animals. Many studies have shown that equines could be infected with this disease. This study serologically investigated whether COVID-19 was transmitted to horses from humans.
Materials, Methods & Results: In this cohort study, 510 horse serums were collected from Çanakkale (n = 80), Istanbul (n = 200), Tekirdağ (n = 75), and Kırklareli (n = 155), provinces in the Thrace region of Turkey. The sampling was conducted in October and December 2021, when the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The samples were grouped as 0-1, 1-5, 6-10, and 11-15 ages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) plates were coated with the whole inactive SARS-CoV-2 virus at five µg/ml. Hyperimmunized horse sera was used as a positive control, and newborn foal serums that did not drink colostrum were used as a negative control. Positive and negative control sera were also tested by virus neutralization assay (VNA). Primary and secondary serum dilution was determined using the checkerboard method. Accordingly, the test serum dilution was 1/12,800, and the secondary antibody dilution was 1/2,500. The classical indirect ELISA steps were followed. Horses, 192 (37.6%) were bred in riding clubs, and 318 (62.4%) were bred in individual barns. OD values ranged between 0.05-1.39. The cut-off value prepared by ROC analysis with 100% sensitivity, 99.78% specificity, and 95% confidence interval was defined as the OD 0.78 limit value in determining positivity. In this study, 60 (11.76%) horses tested serologically positive for SARS-CoV-2. The highest infection rates were in Istanbul (13%) and Kırklareli (13.3%), and the lowest were in Canakkale (8.75%). According to the chi-square test, there was no statistically significant difference in infection rates between cities (P > 0.05). It was determined that horses in the 6-10 age group and in riding schools had a statistically higher rate of contracting the disease than horses in other age groups and barn (P < 0.05). The infection rate was found to be very low in horses younger than 1-year-old and close to 15-year-old.
Discussion: The infection was more intense in the 1-10 age group and riding clubs. The lower incidence of disease was seen in old and young horses because of their lack of use in equestrian activities. According to the results of this study, 11.76% of 510 horses were found to be SARS-CoV-2 positive. As a result of another study conducted on the presence of SARS-CoV-2 in 587 racehorses with a single or several fixed riders, it was reported that 5.9% was positive. In this respect, the results were found to be compatible. The SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity rate in cats and dogs has been reported as 4-43.8% and 3.4-23.5%, respectively. It was thought that the lower infection rate in horses as pets compared to dogs was related to the fact that horse riding was done outdoors, and COVID-19-positive individuals were prohibited from going out to do these activities in the acute period and rested at home during the shedding period. Compared to this study and other studies, it has been determined that the infection in horses is silent and has a short viremia period, and this related seropositivity can be detected. Sick humans should be more careful about zooanthropozoonosis diseases that can be transmitted from humans to horses.
Keywords: Covid-19, cohort study, horse, SARS-CoV-2, seropositivity, zooanthropozoonosis.
Downloads
References
Abdel-Moneim A.S. & Abdelwhab E.M. 2020. Evidence for SARS-CoV-2 infection of animal hosts. Pathogens. 9(7): 529. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens9070529 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9070529
Alluwaimi A.M., Alshubaith I.H., Al-Ali A.M. & Abohelaika S. 2020. The coronaviruses of animals and birds: their zoonosis, vaccines, and models for SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV2. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 7(582287): 1-12. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2020.582287 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.582287
Barrs V.R., Peiris M., Tam K.W., Law P.Y., Brackman C.J., To E.M., Veronica Y., Chu D.K., Perera R.A. & Sit T.H. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 in quarantined domestic cats from COVID-19 households or close contacts, Hong Kong, China. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 26(12): 3071. DOI: 10.3201/eid2612.202786 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2612.202786
Bosco-Lauth A.M., Walker A., Guilbert L., Porter S., Hartwig A., Mcvicker E., Bielefeldt-Ohmann H. & Bowen R.A. 2021. Susceptibility of livestock to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 10(1): 2199-2201. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2021.2003724 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2021.2003724
Burki T. 2020. The origin of SARS-CoV-2. The Lancet Infectious Diseases. 20(9): 1018-1019. DOI: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30641-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30641-1
Calvet G.A., Pereira S.A., Ogrzewalska M., Pauvolid-Corrêa A., Resende P.C., Souza Tassinari W., Pina Costa A., Keidel L.O., Rocha A.S.B. & Silva M.F.B. 2021. Investigation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in dogs and cats of humans diagnosed with COVID-19 in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. PLoS One. 16(4): e0250853. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250853 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0250853
Cerino P., Buonerba C., Brambilla G., Atripaldi L., Tafuro M., Concilio D.D., Vassallo L., Conte G.L., Cuomo M.C. & Maiello I. 2021. No detection of SARS-CoV-2 in animals exposed to infected keepers: results of a COVID-19 surveillance program. Future Science OA. 7(7): FSO711. DOI: 10.2144/fsoa-2021-0038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2144/fsoa-2021-0038
Cherry J.D. & Krogstad P. 2004. SARS: the first pandemic of the 21st century. Pediatric Research. 56(1): 1-5. DOI: 10.1203/01.PDR.0000129184.87042.FC DOI: https://doi.org/10.1203/01.PDR.0000129184.87042.FC
Deng J., Jin Y., Liu Y., Sun J., Hao L., Bai J., Huang T., Lin D., Jin Y. & Tian K. 2020. Serological survey of SARS‐CoV‐2 for experimental, domestic, companion and wild animals excludes intermediate hosts of 35 different species of animals. Transboundary and Emerging Diseases. 67(4): 1745-1749. DOI: 10.1111/tbed.13577 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/tbed.13577
Enül H., Saraç F., Adıay C., Uzar S., Tuncer-Göktuna P., Arun S.S. & Hasöksüz M. 2022. Detection of neutralising antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 in companion animals in Istanbul. Journal of Istanbul Veterinary Sciences. 6(3): 128-133. DOI: 10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.1198979 DOI: https://doi.org/10.30704/http-www-jivs-net.1198979
Erganis O., Sayin Z., Hadimli H.H., Sakmanoglu A., Pinarkara Y., Ozdemir O. & Maden M. 2014. The effectiveness of anti-R. equi hyperimmune plasma against R. equi challenge in thoroughbred Arabian foals of mares vaccinated with R. equi vaccine. The Scientific World Journal. 480732: 1-10. DOI: 10.1155/2014/480732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/480732
Hamer S.A., Pauvolid-Corrêa A., Zecca I.B., Davila E., Auckland L.D., Roundy C.M., Tang W., Torchetti M.K., Killian M.L. & Jenkins-Moore M. 2021. SARS-CoV-2 infections and viral isolations among serially tested cats and dogs in households with infected owners in Texas, USA. Viruses. 13(5): 938. DOI: 10.3390/v13050938 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v13050938
IDEXX. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) RealPCR Test Available at <https://www.idexx.com/en/veterinary/reference-laboratories/overview-idexx-sars-cov-2-covid-19-realpcr-test >
Lawton K.O., Arthur R.M., Moeller B.C., Barnum S. & Pusterla N. 2022. Investigation of the role of healthy and sick equids in the COVID-19 pandemic through serological and molecular testing. Animals. 12(5): 614. DOI: 10.3390/ani12050614 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050614
Liu Y., Hu G., Wang Y., Ren W., Zhao X., Ji F., Zhu Y., Feng F., Gong M. & Ju X. 2021. Functional and genetic analysis of viral receptor ACE2 orthologs reveals a broad potential host range of SARS-CoV-2. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 118(12): e2025373118. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025373118 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025373118
Mackay I.M. & Arden K.E. 2015. MERS coronavirus: diagnostics, epidemiology and transmission. Virology Journal. 12: 1-21. DOI: 10.1186/s12985-015-0439-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12985-015-0439-5
Palmer M.V., Martins M., Falkenberg S., Buckley A., Caserta L.C., Mitchell P.K., Cassmann E.D., Rollins A., Zylich N.C. & Renshaw R.W. 2021. Susceptibility of white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) to SARS-CoV-2. Journal of Virology. 95(11): 10.1128/jvi. 00083-00021. DOI: 10.1128/jvi.00083-21 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00083-21
Patterson E.I., Elia G., Grassi A., Giordano A., Desario C., Smith S., Anderson E., Prince T., Patterson G. & Lorusso E. 2020. Evidence of exposure to SARS-CoV-2 in cats and dogs from households in Italy. Nature Communications. 11(1): 6231. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-20097-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.21.214346
Pickering B.S., Smith G., Pinette M.M., Embury-Hyatt C., Moffat E., Marszal P. & Lewis C.E. 2021. Susceptibility of domestic swine to experimental infection with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 27(1): 104. DOI: 10.3201/eid2701.203399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2701.203399
Pusterla N., Chaillon A., Ignacio C., Smith D.M., Barnum S., Lawton K.O., Smith G. & Pickering B. 2022. SARS-CoV-2 seroconversion in an adult horse with direct contact to a COVID-19 individual. Viruses. 14(5): 1047. DOI: 10.3390/v14051047 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/v14051047
Ministry of Health Turkey. 2021. Coronavirus infection weekly and mothly list. Available at <https://covid19.saglik.gov.tr/TR-66935/genel-koronavirus-tablosu.html>
Schlottau K., Rissmann M., Graaf A., Schön J., Sehl J., Wylezich C., Höper D., Mettenleiter T.C., Balkema-Buschmann A. & Harder T. 2020. SARS-CoV-2 in fruit bats, ferrets, pigs, and chickens: an experimental transmission study. The Lancet Microbe. 1(5): e218-e225. DOI: 10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30089-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S2666-5247(20)30089-6
Shi J., Wen Z., Zhong G., Yang H., Wang C., Huang B., Liu R., He X., Shuai L. & Sun Z. 2020. Susceptibility of ferrets, cats, dogs, and other domesticated animals to SARS–coronavirus 2. Science. 368(6494): 1016-1020. DOI: 10.1126/science.abb7015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb7015
Singh D.K., Singh B., Ganatra S.R., Gazi M., Cole J., Thippeshappa R., Alfson K.J., Clemmons E., Gonzalez O. & Escobedo R. 2021. Responses to acute infection with SARS-CoV-2 in the lungs of rhesus macaques, baboons and marmosets. Nature Microbiology. 6(1): 73-86. DOI: 10.1038/s41564-020-00841-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-020-00841-4
Sit T.H., Brackman C.J., Ip S.M., Tam K.W., Law P.Y., To E.M., Yu V.Y., Sims L.D., Tsang D.N. & Chu D.K. 2020. Infection of dogs with SARS-CoV-2. Nature. 586(7831): 776-778. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2334-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2334-5
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Turkey. 2022. Horse number change in 2021. Available at <https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Iyi-Tarim-Uygulamalari/Istatistikler>
Turkish Statistical Institute. 2022. Number of horses bred in Turkey in 2021. Available at <https://www.tuik.gov.tr/media/announcements/istatistiklerle_Turkey_2021.pdf.>
Ulrich L., Wernike K., Hoffmann D., Mettenleiter T.C. & Beer M. 2020. Experimental infection of cattle with SARS-CoV-2. Emerging infectious diseases. 26(12): 2979. DOI: 10.3201/eid2612.203799 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2612.203799
Yerken K., Uslu A., Bauyrzhan O., Sayin Z., Balevi A., Yerbol I., Ilban A. & Erganis O. 2023. Sero-epidemiology of the Rhodococcus equi in horses in Eastern Kazakhstan. Eurasian Journal of Veterinary Sciences. 39(2), DOI: 10.15312/EurasianJVetSci.2023.401 DOI: https://doi.org/10.15312/EurasianJVetSci.2023.401
Zhang Q., Zhang H., Gao J., Huang K., Yang Y., Hui X., He X., Li C., Gong W. & Zhang Y. 2020. A serological survey of SARS-CoV-2 in cat in Wuhan. Emerging Microbes & Infections. 9(1): 2013-2019. DOI: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1817796 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22221751.2020.1817796
Zhu N., Zhang D., Wang W., Li X., Yang B., Song J., Zhao X., Huang B., Shi W. & Lu R. 2020. A novel coronavirus from patients with pneumonia in China, 2019. New England Journal of Medicine. 382(8): 727-733. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ali Uslu, Asli Balevi, Zafer Sayin, Cumhur Adiay, Mustafa Agah Tekindal, Osman Erganis

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This journal provides open access to all of its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. Such access is associated with increased readership and increased citation of an author's work. For more information on this approach, see the Public Knowledge Project and Directory of Open Access Journals.
We define open access journals as journals that use a funding model that does not charge readers or their institutions for access. From the BOAI definition of "open access" we take the right of users to "read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of these articles" as mandatory for a journal to be included in the directory.
La Red y Portal Iberoamericano de Revistas Científicas de Veterinaria de Libre Acceso reúne a las principales publicaciones científicas editadas en España, Portugal, Latino América y otros países del ámbito latino