Sedative Effects of Medetomidine and Dexmedetomidine in Cats - Evaluation with Bispectral Index Monitoring (BIS)

Authors

  • Eylem Bektaş Bilgiç Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa (IUC), Istanbul, Turkey. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2745-9511
  • Alper Demirutku Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa (IUC), Istanbul, Turkey.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.140569

Keywords:

sedative drugs, brain function monitor, BIS findings, LWR (limb withdrawal reflex), sedation, palpebral reflex

Abstract

Background: Sedation is a state of sleepiness and relaxation that results from the depression of the central nervous system. The depth of sedation can be assessed by hemodynamic responses and neurological signs, such as the palpebral reflex, startle response, nystagmus, and response to stimuli. Currently, the Bispectral Index (BIS) is considered the most accurate monitor for assessing brain function during anesthesia and sedation. BIS values for deep sedation between 60-70, and mild to moderate sedation between 70-90. Values above 90 indicate that the patient is awake. This study aims to compare the sedative effects of medetomidine and dexmedetomidine by evaluating the physical examination findings that indicate the depth of sedation, alongside the BIS monitoring, which is an objective monitoring method.

Materials, Methods & Results: In this study, 100 cats brought to the Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa Faculty of Veterinary Science, Department of Surgery, Otorhinolaryngology (ENT) Clinic between 2018 and 2022, and indicated for Ventral Bulla Ostectomy (VBO) following examinations, were evaluated for BIS findings and physical examination results after sedation administration. Patients with 1st and 2nd degree anesthesia risk according to the ASA, based on physical, laboratory, and radiological examinations, were included in the study. The 100 patients were randomly divided into 2 groups of 50 each. Following the pre-anesthetic examination, butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg) was administered subcutaneously in both groups preemptively. After 10 min of  butorphanol administration, intravenous access through the vena cephalica or vena saphena was obtained using a 22 or 24 gauge angiocath. Medetomidine HCl IV was used for sedation in the 1st group, while Dexmedetomidine HCl (20 μg/kg) IV was used in the 2nd group. After the patients were sedated and complete relaxation was achieved, the self-adhesive sensors of the BIS probe were placed on the frontal region. Posture, jaw tone, palpebral reflex, corneal reflex, pupil size, and limb withdrawal reflex (LWR) were evaluated and recorded before sedation (T0) and at the 5 min following sedation (T1).

Discussion: Alpha-2 adrenoceptor agonists can affect both postural and smooth muscles. Relaxation of postural muscles may manifest as recumbency or ataxia. This study's findings were consistent with existing literature: all patients were in lateral recumbency after 5 min following alpha-2 administration, exhibited decreased jaw tone, and allowed their mouths to be opened easily. Moderate sedation in humans is defined as a reversible state in which response to tactile and vocal stimuli is preserved. However, when considering the BIS and LWR findings, we observed that 72% of the moderately sedated patients in the 1st group lost the LWR reflex, which evaluates the response to painful stimuli. This response to painful stimuli, which is more significant than tactile stimuli, partially contradicts the literature. In addition to considering that different sedative drugs may yield different findings, it was believed that the strong muscle relaxant and analgesic properties of medetomidine could explain the results without causing loss of consciousness. In the intergroup evaluation, the mean BIS value of the 1st group was 72.82, indicating moderate sedation. In contrast, the mean BIS value of the 2nd group was 67.12, which was classified as deep sedation. Contrary to the literature, the BIS findings between the groups showed that deeper sedation occurred in the dexmedetomidine group. Based on the BIS findings, we believe that dexmedetomidine will be more effective than medetomidine in procedures requiring procedural sedation by inducing a hypnotic state close to general anesthesia.

Keywords: sedative drugs, brain function monitor, BIS findings, LWR (limb withdrawal reflex), sedation, palpebral reflex.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alper Demirutku, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa (IUC), Istanbul, Turkey.

Department of Surgery, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

References

Bleijenberg E.H., Van Oostrom H., Akkerdaas L.C., Doornenbal A. & Hellebrekers L.J. 2011. Bispectral index and the clinically evaluated anaesthetic depth in dogs. Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia. 38(6): 536-543. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00651.X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2995.2011.00651.x

Campagnol D., Teixeira Neto F.J., Monteiro E.R., Beier S.L. & Aguiar A.J. 2007. Use of bispectral index to monitor depth of anesthesia in isoflurane-anesthetized dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 68(12): 1300-1307. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.68.12.1300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.68.12.1300

Clark L. 2009. Monitoring the anaesthetised patient. In: Welsh L. (Ed). Anaesthesia for Veterinary Nurses. Singapore: Blackwell Publishing, pp.227-233.

Cowles C.E. 2016. Anestezi Aygıtları ve Monitörler, Morgan & Mikhail klinik anesteziyoloji. In: Morgan G.E., Mikhail M.S. & Murray M.J. (Eds). 5th edn. Ankara: Günes Tıp Kitabevleri, pp.9-123.

Dugdale A.H., Beaumont G., Bradbrook C. & Gurney M. 2020. Sedation and Premedication. In: Veterinary Anaesthesia: Principles to Practice. 2nd edn. Pondicherry: Wiley Blackwell, pp.55-77.

Ebner L.S., Lerche P., Bednarski R.M. & Hubbell J.A. 2013. Effect of dexmedetomidine, morphine-lidocaine-ketamine, and dexmedetomidine-morphine-lidocaine-ketamine constant rate infusions on the minimum alveolar concentration of isoflurane and bispectral index in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 74(7): 963-970. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.74.7.963. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.74.7.963

Gomez M.M.I., Varela L.O., Fontalba N.J.L. & González C. 2020. Effects of fentanyl on intraocular pressure and pupil size in medetomidine‐methadone premedicated dogs: a pilot study. Veterinary Record Open. 7(1): e00039. DOI: 10.1136/vetreco-2019-000391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vetreco-2019-000391

Hall L.W., Clarke K.W. & Trim C.M. 2001. Principles and Procedures In: Veterinary Anaesthesia. 10th edn. London: W.B. Saunders, pp.240-247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-070202035-3.50012-7

Haskins S.C. 2015. Monitoring anesthetized patients. In: Kurt A. Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Stephen A. Greene S.A., Sheilah A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds). Veterinary anesthesia and analgesia, the fifth edition of Lumb and Jones, Pondicherry: Wiley Blackwell, pp.86-113. DOİ: 10.1002/9781119421375.ch4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421375.ch4

Herbert G.L. & Murison P.J. 2013. Eye position of cats anaesthetised with alfaxalone or propofol. Veterinary Record. 172(14): 365. DOI: 10.1136/vr.101404. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.101404

Horsley K.T., Olby N.J., Mitchell M.A., Aulakh K.S. & Gines J. 2021. Effect of sedation on the neurological examination of the patellar and withdrawal reflexes in healthy dogs. Frontiers in Veterinary Science. 8: 664150. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2021.664150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.664150

İyilikçi L., Ökesli S. & Işık B. 2015. Ameliyathane Dışı Anestezi Uygulamaları. Türk Anesteziyoloji ve Reanimasyon Derneği TARD Anestezi Uygulama Kılavuzları. pp.1-35.

Kayhan Z. 2019. İzlem, Ölçüm, Görüntüleme, Değerlendirme ve Kayıt Yöntemleri. In: Klinik Anestezi. 4. Baskı. İstanbul: Logos Yayıncılık Tic. A.Ş.pp.46-81.

Kennedy M. J. & Johnson R.A. 2015. Dexmedetomidine & Atipamezole. Clinician Brief. 2015: 65-67. Available at: https://www.cliniciansbrief.com/article/dexmedetomidine-atipamezole.

Kibar M., Keskin A., Aymirzakizi A. & Öztürk Z. 2022. Effects of medetomidine/ketamine and xylazine/ketamine anesthesia and their reversal by atipamezole on ocular parameters and monitored anesthesia care in cats. Ankara Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi. 69: 251-257. DOI: 10.33988/auvfd.869204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33988/auvfd.869204

Larson M.D. 2008. Mechanism of opioid-induced pupillary effects. Clinical Neurophysiology. 119(6): 1358-1364. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.01.106

Lee L. 2018. Anesthetic Monitoring. Veterinary Surgery. pp.1-11.

March P.A. & Muir W.W. 2003. Use of the bispectral index as a monitor of anesthetic depth in cats anesthetized with isoflurane. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 64(12): 1534-1541. DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1534. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2460/ajvr.2003.64.1534

Medtronic. 2012. Covidien BIS™ Bilateral Brain Monitoring Sensor. Available at: <https://www.medtronic.com/covidien/en-gb/products/brain-monitoring/bis-bilateral-sensor.html >

Megda T.T., Sousa F.G., Miranda F.G., Barreto M.S.O., Mattoso C.R.S. & Beier S.L. 2022. Echocardiographic assessment of felines sedated with dexmedetomidine or xylazine associated with butorphanol. Research, Society and Development. 11(12): e559111234902-e559111234902. DOI: 10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34902. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v11i12.34902

Mourisse J., Gerrits W., Lerou J., Van Egmond J., Zwarts M.J. & Booij L.H.D.J. 2003. Electromyographic assessment of blink and corneal reflexes during midazolam administration: useful methods for assessing depth of anesthesia? Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. 47(5): 593-600. DOI: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00100.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00100.x

Mrazova M., Rauser P., Burova J., Georgiou M. & Fichtel T. 2018. Influence of medetomidine, acepromazine, fentanyl and butorphanol on intraocular pressure and pupil size in healthy dogs. Veterinární Medicína. 63(9): 413-419. DOI: 10.17221/51/2018-VETMED. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17221/51/2018-VETMED

Muir W.W. & Hubbell J.A. 2012. Preanesthetic and Perioperative Medications. In: Handbook of Veterinary Anesthesia. Hoboken: Elsevier Health Sciences, pp.22-57.

Murrell J. 2007. Choice of premedicants in cats and dogs. In Practice. 29(2): 100-106. DOI: 10.1136/inpract.29.2.100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/inpract.29.2.100

Paolo S. 2017. Use of dexmedetomidine in veterinary practice. International Journal of Clinical Anesthesiology. 5(4): 1078.

Pérez G.S., Lozano C.N., Ruiz Roca J.A., López J.P. & Gargallo Albiol J. 2020. Evaluation of endovenous sedation using BIS monitoring in dentistry. A systematic review. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal. 25(4): e439. DOI: 10.4317%2Fmedoral.22884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.22884

Rankin D.C. 2015. Sedatives and tranquilizers. In: Kurt A. Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Stephen A. Greene S.A. & Sheilah A. Robertson S.A. (Eds). Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia: the Fifth Edition of Lumb and Jones. Pondicherry: Wiley Blackwell, pp.196-206. DOI: 10.1002/9781119421375.ch10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421375.ch10

Saenubol P., Akatvipat A., Pleumsamran A. & Chankrachang S. 2021. Correlation between bispectral index value and modified Glasgow Coma Scale score in dogs with altered level of consciousness. Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. 31(1): 52-58. DOI: 10.1111/vec.13014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/vec.13014

Sager J. & McKune C.M. 2022. Anesthesia equipment and monitoring. In: Shelby A.M. & McKune C.M (Eds). Small Animal Anesthesia Techniques. 2nd edn. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, pp.28-52. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119710868.ch2

Schinetsky J. 2015. Effects of Medications on Pupillometry Measurements of Sedation in the Intensive Care Unit. XULAneXUS. 13(1): 3. Available at: <https://digitalcommons.xula.edu/xulanexus/vol13/iss1/3>.

Siegenthaler J., Pleyers T., Raillard M., Spadavecchia C. & Levionnois O.L. 2020. Effect of medetomidine, dexmedetomidine, and their reversal with atipamezole on the nociceptive withdrawal reflex in beagles. Animals. 10(7): 1240. DOI: 10.3390/ani10071240. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani10071240

Simon B.T. & Steagall P.V. 2020. Feline procedural sedation and analgesia: when, why and how. Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery. 22(11): 1029-1045. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X20965830. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098612X20965830

Tranquilli W.J. & Grimm K.A. 2015. Introduction: use, definitions, history, concepts, classification, and considerations for anesthesia and analgesia. In: Kurt A. Grimm K.A., Lamont L.A., Tranquilli W.J., Stephen A. Greene S.A., Sheilah A. & Robertson S.A. (Eds). Veterinary Anesthesia and Analgesia: The fifth edition of Lumb and Jones. Pondicherry: Wiley Blackwel, pp.1-10. DOI: 10.1002/9781119421375.ch1. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119421375.ch1

Verma A., Sooryadas S., Dinesh P.T., Chandy G. & Caulkett N. 2020. Continuous rate infusion anaesthesia with dexmedetomidine-midazolam-ketamine-lignocaine in dogs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery. 41(2): 104-106.

Vinerean H.V. 2018. Anesthesia Monitoring. Available at: < https://research.fiu.edu/ documents/facilities/acf/documents/anesthesia-monitoring-small-animals>.

Wagner M.C., Hecker K.G. & Pang D. S. 2017. Sedation levels in dogs: a validation study. BMC Veterinary Research. 13: 1-8. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-017-1027-2. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-017-1027-2

Additional Files

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Bektaş Bilgiç, E., & Demirutku, A. (2024). Sedative Effects of Medetomidine and Dexmedetomidine in Cats - Evaluation with Bispectral Index Monitoring (BIS). Acta Scientiae Veterinariae, 52(1). https://doi.org/10.22456/1679-9216.140569

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.